88 research outputs found

    Health-related quality of life and late morbidity in concurrent chemoradiation and radiotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma

    Get PDF
    Objective: Concurrent chemoradiation has improved survival of patients with cervical carcinoma. However, follow-up of randomized studies is relatively short and data on long term toxicity are scarce, as is information on their health-related quality of life. This study assesses and compares incidences of late side-effects among patients treated with radiotherapy or chemoradiation using two toxicity scoring systems, and investigates impact on health-related quality of life. Methods: Between 1985 and 1993, 114 patients underwent radiotherapy (n=39) or chemoradiation (n=75) for stage IIA-IVB cervical carcinoma. Late side-effects were scored retrospectively by reviewing medical charts using standardised checklists, focusing on bladder- and intestinal side effects. Health-related quality of life was assessed once using the EORTC QLQ-C30. Results: No significant differences in late treatment-related side-effects between radiotherapy and chemoradiation groups were found. Grade >= 2 toxicity was found in 33% (bladder), and in 6% (bowel). Only 1.8% had both grade 3-4 toxicity. Bladder syndrome with high urinary frequency, urine incontinence and small bowel toxicity had a significant impact on health-related quality of life. Conclusion: Grade 2 are relatively frequent late side effects in curatively treated patients, but are not enhanced by the addition of chemotherapy. Their negative impact on health-related quality of life stresses the importance of new radiation techniques, aiming at reduction of these side effects

    Radiochemotherapy for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: early results

    No full text
    WOS: 000182102800022PubMed ID: 12701977Purpose: Radiotherapy is the standard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer. Recent results of the prospective randomized trials have shown an overall survival and local control advantage for cisplatin-based therapy given concurrently with radiation therapy. Thirty-nine patients who received concurrent chemoradiation between October 1999 and December 2000 were evaluated for treatment response, local control and toxicity. Materials and methods: Thirty-nine patients with Stage IB through IVA cervical carcinoma received weekly cisplatin (40 mg/m(2)) concurrent with radiotherapy. Thirty-two patients received both external and intracavitary radiotherapy and seven patients received only external radiotherapy because of insufficient tumor response for intracavitary application. Total external radiotherapy dose was 64.8 Gy with 1.8 Gy daily fractions in patients who received only external radiotherapy. Midline shielding was performed at 50.4 Gy in patients who were going to receive brachytherapy and the total external radiotherapy dose was 54-59.4 Gy. Brachytherapy was performed with a Rotterdam applicator via the microSelectron HDR machine. A total dose of 8.5-18 Gy was applied to point A. Results: Median age was 55. Distribution by stakes were as follows: Stage IB 5.1%, IIA 28.2%, IIB 43.6%, IIIA 7.7%, IIIB 12.8% and IVA 2.6%. Histologically 33 (84.6%) were epidermoid carcinoma, one was adenocarcinoma, two were undifferentiated carcinoma, one was malignant epithelial tumor. In two patients histological type could not be specified. The median duration of follow-up was 20 months. Four patients had local recurrence and three developed distant metastases. Thirty patients (76.9%) had complete response, eight had (20.5%) partial response and one had (2.6%) stable disease. During or after radiochemotherapy 46.2% of the patients developed toxicity due to chemotherapy. Early and late radiation morbidity rates were 66.7% and 71.8%, respectively. No grade III-IV toxicity was observed. Conclusion: Concurrent chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical cancer is the treatment of choice in suitable patients providing high response rates With acceptable toxicity

    Postoperative radiotherapy in endometrial carcinoma: analysis of prognostic factors in 440 cases

    No full text
    WOS: 000088529300026PubMed ID: 10949404Purpose The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic factors influencing overall, disease-free and local recurrence-free survival in patients treated postoperatively with adjuvant radiotherapy for endometrial carcinoma. Methods: The records of 440 patients with endometrial carcinoma treated by postoperative radiotherapy between January 1985 and June 1997 were reviewed retrospectively. All patients received postoperative external radiotherapy with 1.8-2.0 Gy daily fractions up to 36-68 Gy (median 54 Gy). Intracavitary brachytherapy was applied to 61.8% of the casts. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The log-rank test was used for univariate analysis and the Cox regression model for multivariate analysis. Results: Median age of the patients was 57 (range: 35-83). Histologically 80.2% were adenocarcinoma, 5.7% adenosquamous car cinema, 5.2% clear-cell carcinoma and 4.3% serous papillary carcinoma. The distribution by stages were: 62.2% Stage I, 20.0% Stage II, 14.9% Stage III, 2.8% Stage IV. Median follow-up time was 53 months (7-173 months). Total failure rate was 15.2% with 2.7% of patients having only local failure, 2.0% local and distant failure and 10.5% distant failure only. Five-year overall, disease-free and local recurrence-free survival rates were 81.6%, 80.7% and 94.6%, respectively. According to univariate analysis prognostic factors influencing disease-free surival were histologic type (p=0.0067), histologic grade (p=0.0015), stage (p<0.0001), myometrial invasion (p<0.0001), peritoneal cytology (p=0.0013) and cervical involvement (p=0.0106) while the prognostic factors affecting local recurrence-free survival were stage (p=0.0277), myometrial invasion (p=0.0054), peritoneal cytology (p=0.0427). According to multivariate analysis prognostic factors influencing disease-free survival were histologic type (p=0.0194), myometrial invasion (p=0.0021). and histologic grade (p=0.0303) while the only prognostic factor influencing local recurrence-free survival was myometrial invasion (p=0.0241). Conclusion: Radiotherapy is a highly effective adjuvant treatment providing an excellent locoregional control rate and it should he continued for patients with unfavorable prognostic factors
    corecore