4 research outputs found
El derecho a la imputaci贸n necesaria y de defensa en la formalizaci贸n de la investigaci贸n preparatoria
La presente investigaci贸n analiza la vulneraci贸n del derecho a la imputaci贸n
necesaria y derecho de defensa dentro del proceso penal ante la falta de control
judicial de la formalizaci贸n de la investigaci贸n preparatoria, derechos que vienen
siendo vulnerados por parte del Ministerio Publico a trav茅s de disposiciones de
formalizaci贸n de investigaci贸n preparatoria gen茅ricas, con escasa informaci贸n sobre
los hechos, la norma penal infringida y los actos de investigaci贸n iniciales, que
impiden que la persona inmersa en una investigaci贸n en calidad de autor o participe
pueda ejercer de manera eficiente su derecho de defensa.
En el desarrollo de esta investigaci贸n, se utiliz贸 los m茅todos generales entre ellos el
m茅todo deductivo, inductivo, descriptivo y anal铆tico-sint茅tico con el fin de analizar la
informaci贸n recolectada, especificar las caracter铆sticas de ambos derechos materia de
estudio, obteniendo un resumen organizado, as铆 mismo, se utiliz贸 los m茅todos de
investigaci贸n jur铆dica como el m茅todo exeg茅tico, doctrinario, hist贸rico y
comparativo permitiendo interpretar las normas relacionadas a la investigaci贸n, la
b煤squeda de antecedentes referentes al tema, as铆 como la comparaci贸n con la
legislaci贸n internacional. Entre las t茅cnicas e instrumentos se hizo uso del fichaje,
recopilaci贸n de informaci贸n, documentos y el an谩lisis del contenido.
En consecuencia, lo que se pretende con la presente investigaci贸n ante la evidente
afectaci贸n de ambos derechos, es la regulaci贸n de un control judicial de la
formalizaci贸n de la investigaci贸n preparatoria que impidan investigaciones fiscales
inconsistentes, permitiendo al imputado el ejercicio pleno del derecho de defensa, el cual se encuentra reconocido en la Constituci贸n as铆 como en los tratados
internacionales, tales como la Convenci贸n Americana de Derechos Humanos y el
Pacto Internacional de Derechos Civiles y Pol铆ticos.The present investigation analyzes the violation of the right to imputation necessary
and right of defense within the criminal process in the absence of judicial control of
the formalization of the preparatory investigation, rights that have been violated by
the Public Ministry through formalization provisions of generic preparatory
investigation, with little information about the facts, the criminal rule infringed and
the initial acts of investigation, that prevent the person immersed in an investigation
as author or participant can exercise in an efficient way their right of defense.
In the development of this research, we used the general methods including the
deductive, inductive, descriptive and analytic-synthetic method in order to analyze
the information collected, specify the characteristics of both study subject rights,
obtaining an organized summary, as well same, legal research methods were used as
the exegetical, doctrinal, historical and comparative method allowing to interpret the
norms related to the investigation, the search of antecedents referring to the subject,
as well as the comparison with the international legislation. Among the techniques
and instruments was made use of the signing, collection of information, documents
and content analysis.
Consequently, what is intended with the present investigation in view of the evident
affectation of both rights, is the regulation of a judicial control of the formalization of
the preparatory investigation that prevent inconsistent fiscal investigations, allowing
the accused the full exercise of the right of defense, which is recognized in the
Constitution as well as in international treaties such as the American Convention on
Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.Tesi