31 research outputs found
Towards Abdominal 3-D Scene Rendering from Laparoscopy Surgical Videos using NeRFs
Given that a conventional laparoscope only provides a two-dimensional (2-D)
view, the detection and diagnosis of medical ailments can be challenging. To
overcome the visual constraints associated with laparoscopy, the use of
laparoscopic images and videos to reconstruct the three-dimensional (3-D)
anatomical structure of the abdomen has proven to be a promising approach.
Neural Radiance Fields (NeRFs) have recently gained attention thanks to their
ability to generate photorealistic images from a 3-D static scene, thus
facilitating a more comprehensive exploration of the abdomen through the
synthesis of new views. This distinguishes NeRFs from alternative methods such
as Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) and depth estimation. In this
paper, we present a comprehensive examination of NeRFs in the context of
laparoscopy surgical videos, with the goal of rendering abdominal scenes in
3-D. Although our experimental results are promising, the proposed approach
encounters substantial challenges, which require further exploration in future
research.Comment: The Version of Record of this contribution is published in MLMI 2023
Part I, and is available online at
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45673-2_
Key components of a hepatobiliary surgery curriculum for general surgery residents : results of the FULCRUM International Delphi consensus
Background: In general surgery residency, hepatobiliary training varies significantly across the world. The aim of this study was to establish an international consensus among hepatobiliary surgeons on components of a hepatobiliary curriculum for general surgery residents.
Methods: A three-round modified Delphi technique was employed. Fifty-two hepatobiliary surgeons involved in general surgery training programs were invited. An initial questionnaire was developed by a group of experts in hepatobiliary and educational research after a systematic literature review. It comprised 90 statements about knowledge, technical skills, attitudes, and postoperative care. Panelists could add or alter items. The survey was delivered electronically and the panel was instructed to score the items based on 5-point Likert scale. Consensus was reached when at least 80% of panelists agreed on a statement with Cronbach's alpha value >0.8.
Results: Forty-one (79%) experts have participated. Sixteen panelists are based in Asia, 14 in Europe, and 11 in the Americas. Eighty percent of all proposed skills (81/101) were considered fundamental including knowledge (39/43), technical skills (16/32), attitude (15/15), and postoperative care (11/11).
Conclusion: An international consensus was achieved on components of a hepatobiliary curriculum. Acquiring broad knowledge is fundamental during residency. Advanced liver resection techniques require specialized hepatobiliary training
The Brescia Internationally Validated European Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery (EGUMIPS)
Objective: To develop and update evidence-based and consensus-based guidelines on laparoscopic and robotic pancreatic surgery. Summary Background Data: Minimally invasive pancreatic surgery (MIPS), including laparoscopic and robotic surgery, is complex and technically demanding. Minimizing the risk for patients requires stringent, evidence-based guidelines. Since the International Miami Guidelines on MIPS in 2019, new developments and key publications have been reported, necessitating an update. Methods: Evidence-based guidelines on 22 topics in 8 domains were proposed: terminology, indications, patients, procedures, surgical techniques and instrumentation, assessment tools, implementation and training, and artificial intelligence. The Brescia Internationally Validated European Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery (EGUMIPS, September 2022) used the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) methodology to assess the evidence and develop guideline recommendations, the Delphi method to establish consensus on the recommendations among the Expert Committee, and the AGREE II-GRS tool for guideline quality assessment and external validation by a Validation Committee. Results: Overall, 27 European experts, 6 international experts, 22 international Validation Committee members, 11 Jury Committee members, 18 Research Committee members, and 121 registered attendees of the 2-day meeting were involved in the development and validation of the guidelines. In total, 98 recommendations were developed, including 33 on laparoscopic, 34 on robotic, and 31 on general MIPS, covering 22 topics in 8 domains. Out of 98 recommendations, 97 reached at least 80% consensus among the experts and congress attendees, and all recommendations were externally validated by the Validation Committee. Conclusions: The EGUMIPS evidence-based guidelines on laparoscopic and robotic MIPS can be applied in current clinical practice to provide guidance to patients, surgeons, policy-makers, and medical societies.</p
Cancers metastatic to the liver
The liver is a common site of metastatic cancer spread, and metastatic lesions are the most common malignant liver tumors. Diagnosis of liver metastases often is established based on clinical assessment, laboratory tests, and appropriate imaging. Surgical resection is the treatment of choice for resectable colorectal and neuroendocrine liver metastases. Long-term survival outcome data after treatment of hepatic metastases of noncolorectal non-neuroendocrine tumors are less robust. The treatment strategy for patients with liver metastases should be determined case by case in a multidisciplinary setting
Rectal Lymphoma: Report of a Rare Case and Review of Literature
Colorectal lymphoma is an extremely rare disease, representing less than 0.5% of all primary colorectal neoplasms. The disease is usually diagnosed in the advanced stages because of its primary non-specific symptoms. The most common involved site is cecum followed by rectum and ascending colon. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is a more frequent subtype. Although surgical resection is often technically feasible, optimal therapy for a colorectal lymphoma, especially rectal lymphoma, has not yet been identified. The authors describe a patient with the primary rectal lymphoma, high-grade features and complete response to chemotherapy
Surgical education interventions in liver surgery : a systematic review
The objective of the study was to identify and to evaluate the impact of educational interventions to learn and train liver surgery outside the operating room. A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and ERIC databases from inception to September 2019 according to the PRISMA guidelines. Studies describing and assessing outcomes of educational interventions in liver surgery, outside the operating room, were included. Neither language nor date of publication restriction was applied. Methodological quality was appraised using NOS-E (Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for Education), and the level of evidence was evaluated based on GRADE (Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) standards. Of the 10,403 screened abstracts, 53 articles were eligible for inclusion, comprising 27 descriptive studies (50.9%), 14 case series assessing any relevant outcome (26.4%), 8 non-randomized controlled trials (15.1%), and 4 randomized controlled studies (7.5%). Almost half (26/53) of the studies did not include any participants, while the remainder of the publications (27/53) involved 1306 learners. The majority of the studies focused on cognitive knowledge (31/53) and/or psychomotor skills training (24/53). Only one publication assessed affective skills. The GRADE score was very low or low in most articles (46/53). Five studies were scored high (5-6) according to NOS-E. Two studies reported data regarding the reliability and validity of employed assessment tools. High-quality studies, particularly well-designed randomized controlled trials that evaluate the effectiveness of simulation-based training on learner behavior and patient outcomes in liver surgery, are still lacking. Forthcoming studies should use robust assessment tools supported by validity evidence