"Miljön är viktigt, där vistas barn hela tiden" - En studie om förskolans inlärningsmiljö

Studien har till syfte att ta reda på hur fem olika förskollärare tänker kring betydelsen av inomhusmiljön som främjande för barns lärande och utveckling. Frågeställningarna har besvarats med hjälp av en kvalitativ metod. Vi har utfört semistrukturerade intervjuer med fem förskollärare från fyra olika förskolor. Verksamhetens synsätt på barns inlärning har betydelse för vilka möjligheter som skapas för barnen att lära och utvecklas i sin förskolemiljö. Studien kommer benämna teorier utifrån det utvecklingspsykologiska forskningsfältet då dessa teorier har påverkat samhällets barnsyn. Studiens slutsatser visade på att miljön en viktig resurs i verksamheten. Den bör, enligt förskollärarna, vara föränderlig tillsammans med barnen. Det är även fördelaktigt om miljön erbjuder olika aktiviteter som gynnar det individuella barnets utveckling och lärande. Förskollärarna fick vid intervjun beskriva sin idealiska arbetsmiljö, vilket gav oss många intressanta svar. Deras olika perspektiv kan utveckla nya tankar och idéer till vår framtida yrkesroll som förskollärare

The utility of isotope-coded protein labeling for prioritization of proteins found in ovarian cancer patient urine

Urine offers a number of attractive features as a sample type for biomarker discovery, including noninvasive sampling, quantity and availability, stability, and a narrow dynamic range. In this study we report the first application of isotope coded protein labeling (ICPL), coupled with in-solution isoelectric fractionation and LC-MALDI-TOF/TOF, to examine and prioritize urinary proteins from ovarian cancer patients. Following the definition of stringent exclusion criteria a total of 579 proteins were identified with 43% providing quantitation data. Protein abundance changes were validated for selected proteins by ESI-Qq-TOF MS, following which Western blot and immunohistochemical analysis by tissue microarray was used to explore the biological relevance of the proteins identified. Several established markers (e.g., HE4, osteopontin) were identified at increased levels in ovarian cancer patient urine, validating the approach used; we also identified a number of potential marker candidates (e.g., phosphatidylethanolamine binding protein 1, cell-adhesion molecule 1) previously unreported in the context of ovarian cancer. We conclude that the ICPL strategy for identification and relative quantitation of urine proteins is an appropriate tool for biomarker discovery studies, and can be applied for the selection of potential biomarker candidates for further characterization

The utility of isotope-coded protein labeling for prioritization of proteins found in ovarian cancer patient urine

Urine offers a number of attractive features as a sample type for biomarker discovery, including noninvasive sampling, quantity and availability, stability, and a narrow dynamic range. In this study we report the first application of isotope coded protein labeling (ICPL), coupled with in-solution isoelectric fractionation and LC-MALDI-TOF/TOF, to examine and prioritize urinary proteins from ovarian cancer patients. Following the definition of stringent exclusion criteria a total of 579 proteins were identified with 43% providing quantitation data. Protein abundance changes were validated for selected proteins by ESI-Qq-TOF MS, following which Western blot and immunohistochemical analysis by tissue microarray was used to explore the biological relevance of the proteins identified. Several established markers (e.g., HE4, osteopontin) were identified at increased levels in ovarian cancer patient urine, validating the approach used; we also identified a number of potential marker candidates (e.g., phosphatidylethanolamine binding protein 1, cell-adhesion molecule 1) previously unreported in the context of ovarian cancer. We conclude that the ICPL strategy for identification and relative quantitation of urine proteins is an appropriate tool for biomarker discovery studies, and can be applied for the selection of potential biomarker candidates for further characterization

The utility of isotope-coded protein labeling for prioritization of proteins found in ovarian cancer patient urine

Urine offers a number of attractive features as a sample type for biomarker discovery, including noninvasive sampling, quantity and availability, stability, and a narrow dynamic range. In this study we report the first application of isotope coded protein labeling (ICPL), coupled with in-solution isoelectric fractionation and LC-MALDI-TOF/TOF, to examine and prioritize urinary proteins from ovarian cancer patients. Following the definition of stringent exclusion criteria a total of 579 proteins were identified with 43% providing quantitation data. Protein abundance changes were validated for selected proteins by ESI-Qq-TOF MS, following which Western blot and immunohistochemical analysis by tissue microarray was used to explore the biological relevance of the proteins identified. Several established markers (e.g., HE4, osteopontin) were identified at increased levels in ovarian cancer patient urine, validating the approach used; we also identified a number of potential marker candidates (e.g., phosphatidylethanolamine binding protein 1, cell-adhesion molecule 1) previously unreported in the context of ovarian cancer. We conclude that the ICPL strategy for identification and relative quantitation of urine proteins is an appropriate tool for biomarker discovery studies, and can be applied for the selection of potential biomarker candidates for further characterization

The utility of isotope-coded protein labeling for prioritization of proteins found in ovarian cancer patient urine

Urine offers a number of attractive features as a sample type for biomarker discovery, including noninvasive sampling, quantity and availability, stability, and a narrow dynamic range. In this study we report the first application of isotope coded protein labeling (ICPL), coupled with in-solution isoelectric fractionation and LC-MALDI-TOF/TOF, to examine and prioritize urinary proteins from ovarian cancer patients. Following the definition of stringent exclusion criteria a total of 579 proteins were identified with 43% providing quantitation data. Protein abundance changes were validated for selected proteins by ESI-Qq-TOF MS, following which Western blot and immunohistochemical analysis by tissue microarray was used to explore the biological relevance of the proteins identified. Several established markers (e.g., HE4, osteopontin) were identified at increased levels in ovarian cancer patient urine, validating the approach used; we also identified a number of potential marker candidates (e.g., phosphatidylethanolamine binding protein 1, cell-adhesion molecule 1) previously unreported in the context of ovarian cancer. We conclude that the ICPL strategy for identification and relative quantitation of urine proteins is an appropriate tool for biomarker discovery studies, and can be applied for the selection of potential biomarker candidates for further characterization

The utility of isotope-coded protein labeling for prioritization of proteins found in ovarian cancer patient urine

Urine offers a number of attractive features as a sample type for biomarker discovery, including noninvasive sampling, quantity and availability, stability, and a narrow dynamic range. In this study we report the first application of isotope coded protein labeling (ICPL), coupled with in-solution isoelectric fractionation and LC-MALDI-TOF/TOF, to examine and prioritize urinary proteins from ovarian cancer patients. Following the definition of stringent exclusion criteria a total of 579 proteins were identified with 43% providing quantitation data. Protein abundance changes were validated for selected proteins by ESI-Qq-TOF MS, following which Western blot and immunohistochemical analysis by tissue microarray was used to explore the biological relevance of the proteins identified. Several established markers (e.g., HE4, osteopontin) were identified at increased levels in ovarian cancer patient urine, validating the approach used; we also identified a number of potential marker candidates (e.g., phosphatidylethanolamine binding protein 1, cell-adhesion molecule 1) previously unreported in the context of ovarian cancer. We conclude that the ICPL strategy for identification and relative quantitation of urine proteins is an appropriate tool for biomarker discovery studies, and can be applied for the selection of potential biomarker candidates for further characterization

The utility of isotope-coded protein labeling for prioritization of proteins found in ovarian cancer patient urine

Urine offers a number of attractive features as a sample type for biomarker discovery, including noninvasive sampling, quantity and availability, stability, and a narrow dynamic range. In this study we report the first application of isotope coded protein labeling (ICPL), coupled with in-solution isoelectric fractionation and LC-MALDI-TOF/TOF, to examine and prioritize urinary proteins from ovarian cancer patients. Following the definition of stringent exclusion criteria a total of 579 proteins were identified with 43% providing quantitation data. Protein abundance changes were validated for selected proteins by ESI-Qq-TOF MS, following which Western blot and immunohistochemical analysis by tissue microarray was used to explore the biological relevance of the proteins identified. Several established markers (e.g., HE4, osteopontin) were identified at increased levels in ovarian cancer patient urine, validating the approach used; we also identified a number of potential marker candidates (e.g., phosphatidylethanolamine binding protein 1, cell-adhesion molecule 1) previously unreported in the context of ovarian cancer. We conclude that the ICPL strategy for identification and relative quantitation of urine proteins is an appropriate tool for biomarker discovery studies, and can be applied for the selection of potential biomarker candidates for further characterization

The utility of isotope-coded protein labeling for prioritization of proteins found in ovarian cancer patient urine

Urine offers a number of attractive features as a sample type for biomarker discovery, including noninvasive sampling, quantity and availability, stability, and a narrow dynamic range. In this study we report the first application of isotope coded protein labeling (ICPL), coupled with in-solution isoelectric fractionation and LC-MALDI-TOF/TOF, to examine and prioritize urinary proteins from ovarian cancer patients. Following the definition of stringent exclusion criteria a total of 579 proteins were identified with 43% providing quantitation data. Protein abundance changes were validated for selected proteins by ESI-Qq-TOF MS, following which Western blot and immunohistochemical analysis by tissue microarray was used to explore the biological relevance of the proteins identified. Several established markers (e.g., HE4, osteopontin) were identified at increased levels in ovarian cancer patient urine, validating the approach used; we also identified a number of potential marker candidates (e.g., phosphatidylethanolamine binding protein 1, cell-adhesion molecule 1) previously unreported in the context of ovarian cancer. We conclude that the ICPL strategy for identification and relative quantitation of urine proteins is an appropriate tool for biomarker discovery studies, and can be applied for the selection of potential biomarker candidates for further characterization

The utility of isotope-coded protein labeling for prioritization of proteins found in ovarian cancer patient urine

Urine offers a number of attractive features as a sample type for biomarker discovery, including noninvasive sampling, quantity and availability, stability, and a narrow dynamic range. In this study we report the first application of isotope coded protein labeling (ICPL), coupled with in-solution isoelectric fractionation and LC-MALDI-TOF/TOF, to examine and prioritize urinary proteins from ovarian cancer patients. Following the definition of stringent exclusion criteria a total of 579 proteins were identified with 43% providing quantitation data. Protein abundance changes were validated for selected proteins by ESI-Qq-TOF MS, following which Western blot and immunohistochemical analysis by tissue microarray was used to explore the biological relevance of the proteins identified. Several established markers (e.g., HE4, osteopontin) were identified at increased levels in ovarian cancer patient urine, validating the approach used; we also identified a number of potential marker candidates (e.g., phosphatidylethanolamine binding protein 1, cell-adhesion molecule 1) previously unreported in the context of ovarian cancer. We conclude that the ICPL strategy for identification and relative quantitation of urine proteins is an appropriate tool for biomarker discovery studies, and can be applied for the selection of potential biomarker candidates for further characterization

The utility of isotope-coded protein labeling for prioritization of proteins found in ovarian cancer patient urine

Urine offers a number of attractive features as a sample type for biomarker discovery, including noninvasive sampling, quantity and availability, stability, and a narrow dynamic range. In this study we report the first application of isotope coded protein labeling (ICPL), coupled with in-solution isoelectric fractionation and LC-MALDI-TOF/TOF, to examine and prioritize urinary proteins from ovarian cancer patients. Following the definition of stringent exclusion criteria a total of 579 proteins were identified with 43% providing quantitation data. Protein abundance changes were validated for selected proteins by ESI-Qq-TOF MS, following which Western blot and immunohistochemical analysis by tissue microarray was used to explore the biological relevance of the proteins identified. Several established markers (e.g., HE4, osteopontin) were identified at increased levels in ovarian cancer patient urine, validating the approach used; we also identified a number of potential marker candidates (e.g., phosphatidylethanolamine binding protein 1, cell-adhesion molecule 1) previously unreported in the context of ovarian cancer. We conclude that the ICPL strategy for identification and relative quantitation of urine proteins is an appropriate tool for biomarker discovery studies, and can be applied for the selection of potential biomarker candidates for further characterization