Private and Public Ownership in Outpatient Substance Abuse Treatment: Do We Have a Two-Tiered System?

As investor-owned organizations increase their presence in the mental health care sector, questions emerge regarding the effects of ownership type on service delivery. One important question is whether ownership is related to patient access to care for persons requiring treatment for substance abuse problems. Using data from a 1995 national survey of outpatient substance abuse treatment units, the authors investigate whether there are differences in measures of patient access to care among investor-owned, not-for-profit, and public provider organizations. Results indicate investor-owned units cater to and serve a clientele that differs from that of not-for-profit and public units, suggesting the presence of a two-tiered system of substance abuse treatment.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/44095/1/10488_2004_Article_410518.pd

Persistent Variation in Medicare Payment Authorization for Home Hemodialysis Treatments

Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142984/1/hesr12650-sup-0001-AppendixSA1.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142984/2/hesr12650.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142984/3/hesr12650_am.pd

Managed care and access to substance abuse treatment services

Using nationally representative data from 1995 and 2000, this study examined how managed care penetration and other organizational characteristics were related to accessibility to outpatient substance abuse treatment. At an organizational level, access was measured as the percentage of clients unable to pay for services; the percentage of clients receiving a reduced fee; and the percentage of clients with shortened treatment because of their inability to pay. Treatment units with both relatively low and relatively high managed care penetration were more likely to support access to care; these units provided care to higher percentages of clients unable to pay and were less likely to shorten treatment because of client inability to pay. Treatment units with midrange managed care penetration were least likely to support access to care. The complexity of managing in an environment of conflicting incentives may reduce the organization's ability to serve those with limited financial means.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/45776/1/11414_2005_Article_BF02289805.pd

Managed care and technical efficiency in outpatient substance abuse treatment units

This article examines (1) the extent to which managed care participation is associated with technical efficiency in outpatient substance abuse treatment (OSAT) organizations and (2) the contributions of specific managed care practices as well as other organizational, financial, and environmental attributes to technical efficiency in these organizations. Data are from a nationally representative sample survey of OSAT organizations conducted in 1995. Technical efficiency is modeled using data envelopment analysis. Overall, there were few significant associations between managed care dimensions and technical efficiency in outpatient treatment organizations. Only one managed care oversight procedure, the imposition of sanctions by managed care firms, was significantly associated with relative efficiency of these provider organizations. However, several organizational factors were associated with the relative level of efficiency including hospital affiliation, mental health center affiliation, JCAHO accreditation, receipt of lump sum revenues, methadone treatment modality, percentage clients unemployed, and percentage clients who abuse multiple drugs.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/45766/1/11414_2005_Article_BF02287509.pd

Employing super-efficiency analysis as an alternative to DEA: An application in outpatient substance abuse treatment

A common technique for conducting efficiency analyses consists of a two-stage procedure that combines data envelopment analysis (DEA) with Tobit regression. As the DEA scores are censored at one, this method has the drawback of masking important information at the upper tail of the distribution of scores. In this paper, we present a DEA-based methodology for a two-stage efficiency analysis where the upper bound constraint of one for the efficiency scores is relaxed. This method, super-efficiency DEA, is contrasted with the two-stage approach that employs traditional, bounded DEA scores. We use data from the National Drug Abuse Treatment Survey to examine how the relative efficiency of the treatment units is affected by the organizational structures, operating characteristics and treatment modalities of a nationally representative sample of outpatient substance abuse treatment units. Our results show that the super-efficiency DEA approach offers advantages over the traditional methodology. It is easy to implement, and, for the same sample size provides more information.Efficiency Super-efficiency DEA Tobit regression Substance abuse

Duration of nonmethadone outpatient treatment: results from a national survey.

OBJECTIVES: This study examined organizational trends from 1990 to 2000 and unit characteristics associated with the duration of nonmethadone outpatient addiction treatment. METHODS: Program directors and clinical supervisors from a nationally representative panel of nonmethadone outpatient units in the United States were surveyed in 1990, 1995, and 2000. Treatment duration was measured from clinical supervisors\u27 reports of the average length of stay. Negative binominal regression models controlled for multivariate effects. RESULTS: Treatment duration modestly declined between 1990 and 2000 while addiction severity increased. Affiliation with a mental health center, older program age, JCAHO accreditation-ostensibly a marker for structural quality-and serving more clients with prior authorization requirements- a measure of managed care stringency-were associated with shorter treatment durations. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that treatment duration did not increase between 1990 and 2000 despite clients\u27 worsening addiction severity and growing evidence that longer duration of formal treatment improves treatment outcome. In addition, programs with JCAHO accreditation and stronger managed care oversight appeared to seek efficiencies through reductions in treatment duration