Towards Measuring Adversarial Twitter Interactions against Candidates in the US Midterm Elections

Adversarial interactions against politicians on social media such as Twitter have significant impact on society. In particular they disrupt substantive political discussions online, and may discourage people from seeking public office. In this study, we measure the adversarial interactions against candidates for the US House of Representatives during the run-up to the 2018 US general election. We gather a new dataset consisting of 1.7 million tweets involving candidates, one of the largest corpora focusing on political discourse. We then develop a new technique for detecting tweets with toxic content that are directed at any specific candidate.Such technique allows us to more accurately quantify adversarial interactions towards political candidates. Further, we introduce an algorithm to induce candidate-specific adversarial terms to capture more nuanced adversarial interactions that previous techniques may not consider toxic. Finally, we use these techniques to outline the breadth of adversarial interactions seen in the election, including offensive name-calling, threats of violence, posting discrediting information, attacks on identity, and adversarial message repetition

Beyond Trending Topics: Real-World Event Identification on Twitter

User-contributed messages on social media sites such as Twitter have emerged as powerful, real-time means of information sharing on the Web. These short messages tend to reflect a variety of events in real time, earlier than other social media sites such as Flickr or YouTube, making Twitter particularly well suited as a source of real-time event content. In this paper, we explore approaches for analyzing the stream of Twitter messages to distinguish between messages about real-world events and non-event messages. Our approach relies on a rich family of aggregate statistics of topically similar message clusters, including temporal, social, topical, and Twitter-centric features. Our large-scale experiments over millions of Twitter messages show the effectiveness of our approach for surfacing real-world event content on Twitter

On the Accuracy of Hyper-local Geotagging of Social Media Content

Social media users share billions of items per year, only a small fraction of which is geotagged. We present a data- driven approach for identifying non-geotagged content items that can be associated with a hyper-local geographic area by modeling the location distributions of hyper-local n-grams that appear in the text. We explore the trade-off between accuracy, precision and coverage of this method. Further, we explore differences across content received from multiple platforms and devices, and show, for example, that content shared via different sources and applications produces significantly different geographic distributions, and that it is best to model and predict location for items according to their source. Our findings show the potential and the bounds of a data-driven approach to geotag short social media texts, and offer implications for all applications that use data-driven approaches to locate content.Comment: 10 page

Trustworthiness Evaluations of Search Results: The Impact of Rank and Misinformation

Users rely on search engines for information in critical contexts, such as public health emergencies. Understanding how users evaluate the trustworthiness of search results is therefore essential. Research has identified rank and the presence of misinformation as factors impacting perceptions and click behavior in search. Here, we elaborate on these findings by measuring the effects of rank and misinformation, as well as warning banners, on the perceived trustworthiness of individual results in search. We conducted three online experiments (N=3196) using Covid-19-related queries to address this question. We show that although higher-ranked results are clicked more often, they are not more trusted. We also show that misinformation did not change trust in accurate results below it. However, a warning about unreliable sources backfired, decreasing trust in accurate information but not misinformation. This work addresses concerns about how people evaluate information in search, and illustrates the dangers of generic prevention approaches.Comment: 24 pages, 10 figures, 4 supplementary file

Web-Based VR Experiments Powered by the Crowd

We build on the increasing availability of Virtual Reality (VR) devices and Web technologies to conduct behavioral experiments in VR using crowdsourcing techniques. A new recruiting and validation method allows us to create a panel of eligible experiment participants recruited from Amazon Mechanical Turk. Using this panel, we ran three different crowdsourced VR experiments, each reproducing one of three VR illusions: place illusion, embodiment illusion, and plausibility illusion. Our experience and worker feedback on these experiments show that conducting Web-based VR experiments using crowdsourcing is already feasible, though some challenges---including scale---remain. Such crowdsourced VR experiments on the Web have the potential to finally support replicable VR experiments with diverse populations at a low cost.Comment: The Web Conference 2018 (WWW 2018); update citation forma