542 research outputs found

    Constraints on CPT violation from WMAP three year polarization data: a wavelet analysis

    Full text link
    We perform a wavelet analysis of the temperature and polarization maps of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) delivered by the WMAP experiment in search for a parity violating signal. Such a signal could be seeded by new physics beyond the standard model, for which the Lorentz and CPT symmetries may not hold. Under these circumstances, the linear polarization direction of a CMB photon may get rotated during its cosmological journey, a phenomenon also called cosmological birefringence. Recently, Feng et al. have analyzed a subset the WMAP and BOOMERanG 2003 angular power spectra of the CMB, deriving a constraint that mildly favors a non zero rotation. By using wavelet transforms we set a tighter limit on the CMB photon rotation angle \Delta\alpha= -2.5 \pm 3.0 (\Delta\alpha= -2.5 \pm 6.0) at the one (two) \sigma level, consistent with a null detection.Comment: 7 pages, 4 figures, some modifications to match accepted (PRD) version, results unchange

    Constraints on secret neutrino interactions after Planck

    Full text link
    (Abridged) Neutrino interactions beyond the standard model may affect the cosmological evolution and can be constrained through observations. We consider the possibility that neutrinos possess secret scalar or pseudoscalar interactions mediated by the Nambu-Goldstone boson of a still unknown spontaneously broken global U(1)U(1) symmetry, as in, e.g. , Majoron models. In such scenarios, neutrinos still decouple at T1T\simeq 1 MeV, but become tightly coupled again ('recouple') at later stages of the cosmological evolution. We use available observations of CMB anisotropies, including Planck 2013 and the joint BICEP2/Planck 2015 data, to derive constraints on the quantity γνν4\gamma_{\nu \nu}^4, parameterizing the neutrino collision rate due to (pseudo)scalar interactions. We consider both a minimal extension of the standard Λ\LambdaCDM model, and scenarios with extra relativistic species or non-vanishing tensors. We find a typical constraint γνν4<0.9×1027\gamma_{\nu \nu}^4 < 0.9\times 10^{-27} (95% C.L.), implying an upper limit on the redshift zrecz_{rec} of neutrino recoupling <8500< 8500. In the framework of Majoron models, the upper limit on γνν\gamma_{\nu \nu} roughly translates on a constraint g<8.2×107g < 8.2\times 10^{-7} on the Majoron-neutrino coupling constant gg. In general, the data show a weak (1σ\sim 1\sigma) but intriguing preference for non-zero values of γνν4\gamma_{\nu \nu}^4, with best fits in the range γνν4=(0.150.35)×1027\gamma_{\nu \nu}^4 = (0.15 - 0.35)\times 10^{-27}, depending on the particular dataset. This is more evident when either observations from ACT and SPT are included, or the possibility of non-vanishing tensor modes is considered. In particular, for the minimal model Λ\LambdaCDM +γνν\gamma_{\nu \nu} and including the Planck 2013, ACT and SPT data, we report γνν4=(0.450.38+0.15)×1027\gamma_{\nu \nu}^4=( 0.45^{+0.15}_{-0.38} )\times10^{-27} (200<zrec<5700200 < z_{rec} < 5700) at 68% confidence level.Comment: 19 pages, 7 figures, 3 tables. Replaced to match version accepted for pubblication in JCA

    A note on the birefringence angle estimation in CMB data analysis

    Full text link
    Parity violating physics beyond the standard model of particle physics induces a rotation of the linear polarization of photons. This effect, also known as cosmological birefringence (CB), can be tested with the observations of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropies which are linearly polarized at the level of 510%5-10\%. In particular CB produces non-null CMB cross correlations between temperature and B mode-polarization, and between E- and B-mode polarization. Here we study the properties of the so called D-estimators, often used to constrain such an effect. After deriving the framework of both frequentist and Bayesian analysis, we discuss the interplay between birefringence and weak-lensing, which, albeit parity conserving, modifies pre-existing TB and EB cross correlation.Comment: 12 pages. Accepted for publication in JCA

    Testing chirality of primordial gravitational waves with Planck and future CMB data: no hope from angular power spectra

    Full text link
    We use the 2015 Planck likelihood in combination with the Bicep2/Keck likelihood (BKP and BK14) to constrain the chirality, χ\chi, of primordial gravitational waves in a scale-invariant scenario. In this framework, the parameter χ\chi enters theory always coupled to the tensor-to-scalar ratio, rr, e.g. in combination of the form χr\chi \cdot r. Thus, the capability to detect χ\chi critically depends on the value of rr. We find that with present data set χ\chi is \textit{de facto}unconstrained. We also provide forecasts for χ\chi from future CMB experiments, including COrE+, exploring several fiducial values of rr. We find that the current limit on rr is tight enough to disfavor a neat detection of χ\chi. For example, in the unlikely case in which r0.1(0.05)r\sim0.1(0.05), the maximal chirality case, i.e. χ=±1\chi = \pm1, could be detected with a significance of 2.5(1.5)σ\sim2.5(1.5)\sigma at best. We conclude that the two-point statistics at the basis of CMB likelihood functions is currently unable to constrain chirality and may only provide weak limits on χ\chi in the most optimistic scenarios. Hence, it is crucial to investigate the use of other observables, e.g. provided by higher order statistics, to constrain these kind of parity violating theories with the CMB.Comment: 15 pages, 3 figures. Updated to match published versio

    Cosmic microwave background constraints on secret interactions among sterile neutrinos

    Get PDF
    Secret contact interactions among eV sterile neutrinos, mediated by a massive gauge boson XX (with MXMWM_X \ll M_W), and characterized by a gauge coupling gXg_X, have been proposed as a mean to reconcile cosmological observations and short-baseline laboratory anomalies. We constrain this scenario using the latest Planck data on Cosmic Microwave Background anisotropies, and measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO). We consistently include the effect of secret interactions on cosmological perturbations, namely the increased density and pressure fluctuations in the neutrino fluid, and still find a severe tension between the secret interaction framework and cosmology. In fact, taking into account neutrino scattering via secret interactions, we derive our own mass bound on sterile neutrinos and find (at 95% CL) ms<0.82m_s < 0.82 eV or ms<0.29m_s < 0.29 eV from Planck alone or in combination with BAO, respectively. These limits confirm the discrepancy with the laboratory anomalies. Moreover, we constrain, in the limit of contact interaction, the effective strength GXG_X to be <2.8(2.0)×1010GF < 2.8 (2.0) \times 10^{10}\,G_F from Planck (Planck+BAO). This result, together with the mass bound, strongly disfavours the region with MX0.1M_X \sim 0.1 MeV and relatively large coupling gX101g_X\sim 10^{-1}, previously indicated as a possible solution to the small scale dark matter problem.Comment: 15 pages, 3 figures, 4 table

    CMB Polarization Systematics, Cosmological Birefringence and the Gravitational Waves Background

    Full text link
    Cosmic Microwave Background experiments must achieve very accurate calibration of their polarization reference frame to avoid biasing the cosmological parameters. In particular, a wrong or inaccurate calibration might mimic the presence of a gravitational wave background, or a signal from cosmological birefringence, a phenomenon characteristic of several non-standard, symmetry breaking theories of electrodynamics that allow for \textit{in vacuo} rotation if the polarization direction of the photon. Noteworthly, several authors have claimed that the BOOMERanG 2003 (B2K) published polarized power spectra of the CMB may hint at cosmological birefringence. Such analyses, however, do not take into account the reported calibration uncertainties of the BOOMERanG focal plane. We develop a formalism to include this effect and apply it to the BOOMERanG dataset, finding a cosmological rotation angle α=4.3±4.1\alpha=-4.3^\circ\pm4.1^\circ. We also investigate the expected performances of future space borne experiment, finding that an overall miscalibration larger then 11^\circ for Planck and 0.20.2\circ for EPIC, if not properly taken into account, will produce a bias on the constraints on the cosmological parameters and could misleadingly suggest the presence of a GW background.Comment: 10 pages, 3 figure

    Tickling the CMB damping tail: scrutinizing the tension between the ACT and SPT experiments

    Full text link
    The Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT) and the South Pole Telescope (SPT) have recently provided new, very precise measurements of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropy damping tail. The values of the cosmological parameters inferred from these measurements, while broadly consistent with the expectations of the standard cosmological model, are providing interesting possible indications for new physics that are definitely worth of investigation. The ACT results, while compatible with the standard expectation of three neutrino families, indicate a level of CMB lensing, parametrized by the lensing amplitude parameter A_L, that is about 70% higher than expected. If not a systematic, this anomalous lensing amplitude could be produced by modifications of general relativity or coupled dark energy. Vice-versa, the SPT experiment, while compatible with a standard level of CMB lensing, prefers an excess of dark radiation, parametrized by the effective number of relativistic degrees of freedom N_eff. Here we perform a new analysis of these experiments allowing simultaneous variations in both these, non-standard, parameters. We also combine these experiments, for the first time in the literature, with the recent WMAP9 data, one at a time. Including the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) prior on the Hubble constant and information from baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) surveys provides the following constraints from ACT: N_eff=3.23\pm0.47, A_L=1.65\pm0.33 at 68% c.l., while for SPT we have N_eff=3.76\pm0.34, A_L=0.81\pm0.12 at 68% c.l.. In particular, the A_L estimates from the two experiments, even when a variation in N_eff is allowed, are in tension at more than 95% c.l..Comment: 7 pages, 7 figures, v.2. some typos and sentences correcte
    corecore