Circulation Tumor Cells: counts and characteristics

In recent years, many new anti-cancer agents have been developed and introduced into clinical care. While these new agents have led to substantial gains in response rates and life expectancies, they have also increased the need for tools to select those patients benefitting from said therapies. Once patients develop metastatic disease, treatment is aimed at improving quality of life and prolonging life expectancy, but is always a trade-off against the side-effects that are inevitably associated with anti-tumor therapy, underscoring the need to select only those patients who are likely to respond to a particular drug. However, there is still an unmet need for such an array of reliable predictive factors, a need that can be met by designing studies in which patient subgroups are defined and stratified based on rational, biology-driven but feasible tumor characteristics. An increasing number of studies is being designed in which, for example, only patients with a specific gain-of-function mutation are subjected to a monoclonal antibody therapy aimed at the activated pathway this gene is involved in. While substantial progress is being made with this approach, patient selection has thus far been far from perfect. Even a powerful predictor such as a KRAS mutation for EGFR-inhibiting therapy results in a response in just 20% of patients who are deemed sensitive based on their KRAS wild-type status. One of the reasons for the disappointing performance of predictive factors could be the fact that they are most often based on primary tumor characteristics, while at the time of metastatic disease, a patients’ prognosis is determined by their metastatic tumor load and its biological phenotype. Through processes such as clonal selection and the inherent genomic instability of the tumor or as a consequence of therapy pressure, metastatic tumor cells can differ substantially and vitally from primary tumor cells. Analysis of metastatic tissue would thus probably be better indicative of the actual tumor load and its underlying biology, and lead to better response prediction. Unfortunately, repetitive metastatic biopsies are invasive and painful, understandably limiting their use in clinical practice. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) provide a very promising solution for this problem, as they can be obtained and characterized repetitively and non-invasively through venipunctures, and thus serve as a surrogate ‘liquid biopsy’ of metastases

Diagnostic applications of cell-free and circulating tumor cell-associated miRNAs in cancer patients

Summary: Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have rapidly developed as important cancer biomarkers after their enumeration proved to be prognostic in metastatic breast, colorectal and prostate cancer, and their rise or decline after the first cycle of therapy showed to predict therapy response. Besides mere counting, CTCs can be isolated and subsequently analyzed using various molecular applications, including miRNA expression analysis. Recently, miRNA expression profiling in primary tumors has yielded promising results. However, establishing miRNA expression in the circulation likely has advantages over determination in primary tumor tissue, further augmenting the potential applications of miRNA determination in oncology. Additionally to CTC-associated miRNAs, free circulating miRNAs have been identified in whole blood, plasma and serum. Since determination of miRNAs in peripheral blood, either cell-free or CTC-associated, is expected to become important in oncology, especially when linked to and interpreted together with epithelial CTCs, this review focuses on measuring miRNAs in the circulation of cancer patients

¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI for restaging esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose ( 18 F-FDG) PET/MRI may potentially improve tumor detection after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for esophageal cancer. METHODS: This was a prospective, single-center feasibility study. At 6-12 weeks after nCRT, patients underwent standard 18 F-FDG PET/computed tomography (CT) followed by PET/MRI, and completed a questionnaire to evaluate burden. Two teams of readers either assessed the 18 F-FDG PET/CT or the 18 F-FDG PET/MRI first; the other scan was assessed 1 month later. Maximum standardized uptake value corrected for lean body mass (SUL max ) and mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC mean ) were measured at the primary tumor location. Histopathology of the surgical resection specimen served as the reference standard for diagnostic accuracy calculations. When patients had a clinically complete response and continued active surveillance, response evaluations until 9 months after nCRT served as a proxy for ypT and ypN (i.e. 'ycT' and 'ycN'). RESULTS: In the 21 included patients [median age 70 (IQR 62-75), 16 males], disease recurrence was found in the primary tumor in 14 (67%) patients (of whom one ypM+, detected on both scans) and in locoregional lymph nodes in six patients (29%). Accuracy (team 1/team 2) to detect yp/ycT+ with 18 F-FDG PET/MRI vs. 18 F-FDG PET/CT was 38/57% vs. 76/61%. For ypN+, accuracy was 63/53% vs. 63/42%, resp. Neither SUL max (both scans) nor ADC mean were discriminatory for yp/ycT+ . Fourteen of 21 (67%) patients were willing to undergo a similar 18 F-FDG PET/MRI examination in the future. CONCLUSION: 18 F-FDG PET/MRI currently performs comparably to 18 F-FDG PET/CT. Improvements in the scanning protocol, increasing reader experience and performing serial scans might contribute to enhancing the accuracy of tumor detection after nCRT using 18 F-FDG PET/MRI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register NL9352.</p

¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI for restaging esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose ( 18 F-FDG) PET/MRI may potentially improve tumor detection after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for esophageal cancer. METHODS: This was a prospective, single-center feasibility study. At 6-12 weeks after nCRT, patients underwent standard 18 F-FDG PET/computed tomography (CT) followed by PET/MRI, and completed a questionnaire to evaluate burden. Two teams of readers either assessed the 18 F-FDG PET/CT or the 18 F-FDG PET/MRI first; the other scan was assessed 1 month later. Maximum standardized uptake value corrected for lean body mass (SUL max ) and mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC mean ) were measured at the primary tumor location. Histopathology of the surgical resection specimen served as the reference standard for diagnostic accuracy calculations. When patients had a clinically complete response and continued active surveillance, response evaluations until 9 months after nCRT served as a proxy for ypT and ypN (i.e. 'ycT' and 'ycN'). RESULTS: In the 21 included patients [median age 70 (IQR 62-75), 16 males], disease recurrence was found in the primary tumor in 14 (67%) patients (of whom one ypM+, detected on both scans) and in locoregional lymph nodes in six patients (29%). Accuracy (team 1/team 2) to detect yp/ycT+ with 18 F-FDG PET/MRI vs. 18 F-FDG PET/CT was 38/57% vs. 76/61%. For ypN+, accuracy was 63/53% vs. 63/42%, resp. Neither SUL max (both scans) nor ADC mean were discriminatory for yp/ycT+ . Fourteen of 21 (67%) patients were willing to undergo a similar 18 F-FDG PET/MRI examination in the future. CONCLUSION: 18 F-FDG PET/MRI currently performs comparably to 18 F-FDG PET/CT. Improvements in the scanning protocol, increasing reader experience and performing serial scans might contribute to enhancing the accuracy of tumor detection after nCRT using 18 F-FDG PET/MRI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register NL9352.</p

mRNA expression profiles in circulating tumor cells of metastatic colorectal cancer patients

The molecular characterization of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) is a promising tool for the repeated and non-invasive evaluation of predictive and prognostic factors. Challenges associated with CTC characterization using the only FDA approved method for CTC enumeration, the CellSearch technique, include the presence of an excess of leukocytes in CTC-enriched blood fractions. Here we aimed to identify colorectal tumor-specific gene expression levels in the blood of patients with and without detectable CTCs according to CellSearch criteria. Materials and methods: Blood of 30 healthy donors (HDs) and 142 metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients was subjected to CellSearch CTC enumeration and isolation. In all samples, 95 mRNAs were measured by reverse transcriptase quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). HD blood samples and patient samples with three or more CTCs were compared to identify CTC-specific mRNAs. Patient samples without detectable CTCs were separately analyzed. Results: Thirty-four CTC-specific mRNAs were higher expressed in patients with ≥3 CTCs compared with HDs (Mann-Whitney U-test P<0.05). Among patients without detectable CTCs, a HD-unlike subgroup was identified which could be distinguished from HDs by the expression of epithelial genes such as KRT19, KRT20 and AGR2. Also, in an independent patient set, a similar HD-unlike group could be identified among the patients without detectable CTCs according to the CellSearch system. Conclusion: Extensive molecular characterization of colorectal CTCs is feasible and a subgroup of patients without detectable CTCs according to CellSearch criteria bears circulating tumor load, which may have clinical consequences. This CTC-specific gene panel for mCRC patients may enable the exploration of CTC characterization as a novel means to further individualize cancer treatment

An 8-gene mRNA expression profile in circulating tumor cells predicts response to aromatase inhibitors in metastatic breast cancer patients

Background: Molecular characterization of circulating tumor cells (CTC) is promising for personalized medicine. We aimed to identify a CTC gene expression profile predicting outcome to first-line aromatase inhibitors in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. Methods: CTCs were isolated from 78 MBC patients before treatment start. mRNA expression levels of 96 genes were measured by quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. After applying predefined exclusion criteria based on lack of sufficient RNA quality and/or quantity, the data from 45 patients were used to construct a gene expression profile to predict poor responding patients, defined as disease progression or death <9 months, by a leave-one-out cross validation. Results: Of the 45 patients, 19 were clinically classified as poor responders. To identify them, the 75 % most variable genes were used to select genes differentially expressed between good and poor responders. An 8-gene CTC predictor was significantly associated with outcome (Hazard Ratio [HR] 4.40, 95 % Confidence Interval [CI]: 2.17-8.92, P < 0.001). This predictor identified poor responding patients with a sensitivity of 63 % and a positive predictive value of 75 %, while good responding patients were correctly predicted in 85 % of the cases. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, including CTC count at baseline, the 8-gene CTC predictor was the only factor independently associated with outcome (HR 4.59 [95 % CI: 2.11-9.56], P < 0.001). This 8-gene signature was not associated with outcome in a group of 71 MBC patients treated with systemic treatments other than AI. Conclusions: An 8-gene CTC predictor was identified which discriminates good and poor outcome to first-line aromatase inhibitors in MBC patients. Although results need to be validated, this study underscores the potential of molecular characterization of CTCs

Molecular characteristics of circulating tumor cells resemble the liver metastasis more closely than the primary tumor in metastatic colorectal cancer

Background: CTCs are a promising alternative for metastatic tissue biopsies for use in precision medicine approaches. We investigated to what extent the molecular characteristics of circula

International study on inter-reader variability for circulating tumor cells in breast cancer

Introduction: Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have been studied in breast cancer with the CellSearch® system. Given the low CTC counts in non-metastatic breast cancer, it is important to evaluate the inter-reader agreement.Methods: CellSearch® images (N = 272) of either CTCs or white blood cells or artifacts from 109 non-metastatic (M0) and 22 metastatic (M1) breast cancer patients from reported studies were sent to 22 readers from 15 academic laboratories and 8 readers from two Veridex laboratories. Each image was scored as No CTC vs CTC HER2- vs CTC HER2+. The 8 Veridex readers were summarized to a Veridex Consensus (VC) to compare each academic reader using % agreement and kappa (κ) statistics. Agreement was compared according to disease stage and CTC counts using the Wilcoxon signed rank test.Results: For CTC definition (No CTC vs CTC), the median agreement between academic readers and VC was 92% (range 69 to 97%) with a median κ of 0.83 (range 0.37 to 0.93). Lower agreement was observed in images from M0 (median 91%, range 70 to 96%) compared to M1 (median 98%, range 64 to 100%) patients (P < 0.001) and from M0 and <3CTCs (median 87%, range 66 to 95%) compared to M0 and ≥3CTCs samples (median 95%, range 77 to 99%), (P < 0.001). For CTC HER2 expression (HER2- vs HER2+), the median agreement was 87% (range 51 to 95%) with a median κ of 0.74 (range 0.25 to 0.90).Conclusions: The inter-reader agreement for CTC definition was high. Reduced agreement was observed in M0 patients with low CTC counts. Continuous training and independent image review are required

Detection of circulating tumor cells in breast cancer may improve through enrichment with anti-CD146

Most assays to detect circulating tumor cells (CTCs) rely on EpCAM expression on tumor cells. Recently, our group reported that in contrast to other molecular breast cancer subtypes, "normal-like" cell lines lack EpCAM expression and are thus missed when CTCs are captured with EpCAM-based technology [J Natl Cancer Inst 101(1):61-66, 2009]. Here, the use of CD146 is introduced to detect EpCAM-negative CTCs, thereby improving CTC detection. CD146 and EpCAM expression were assessed in our panel of 41 breast cancer cell lines. Cells from 14 cell lines, 9 of which normal-like, were spiked into healthy donor blood. Using CellSearch (TM) technology, 7.5 ml whole blood was enriched for CTCs by adding ferrofluids loaded with antibodies against EpCAM and/or CD146 followed by staining for Cytokeratin and DAPI. Hematopoietic cells and circulating endothelial cells (CECs) were counterstained with CD45 and CD34, respectively. A similar approach was applied for blood samples of 20 advanced breast cancer patients. Eight of 9 normal-like breast cancer cell lines lacked EpCAM expression but did express CD146. Five of these 8 could be adequately recovered by anti-CD146 ferrofluids. Of 20 advanced breast cancer patients whose CTCs were enumerated with anti-EpCAM and anti-CD146 ferrofluids, 9 had CD146+ CTCs. Cells from breast cancer cell lines that lack EpCAM expression frequently express CD146 and can be recovered by anti-CD146 ferrofluids. CD146+ CTCs are present in the peripheral blood of breast cancer patients with advanced disease. Combined use of anti-CD146 and anti-EpCAM is likely to improve CTC detection in breast cancer patients