36 research outputs found
継承語年少学習者と第二言語学習者 : ロシア語教育の方法
<p>(G1) (Normal control group); (G2) (Ulcer control group); (G3) (Omeprazole); (G4) (62.5 mg/kg), (G5) (125 mg/kg), (G6) (250 mg/kg) and (G7) (500 mg/kg) of <i>V</i>. <i>pubescens</i> extract. HSP70 protein was over-expressed in rats pre-treated with omeprazole or <i>V</i>. <i>pubescens</i> extract (brown color shows over-expression of HSP70 protein) (magnification 20×). There were 6 rats in each group of experiment. The Image J program was used to evaluate protein expression. All values are expressed as the means ± the standard error of mean. The mean difference was significant at the <i>p < 0</i>.<i>05</i> level compared to the cancer control group.</p
<総説>
家族看護学が看護の専門領域として確立され発展していくため,今後の研究の方向性を明らかにしたいと,国内外の家族および家族看護学に関する文献の数量的動向と研究領域別文献概観を行った結果,国内外ともに家族,家族の健康,家族援助に関する研究報告は増加傾向にあり,家族への関心の高まりと実践上の必要性が反映されていた。また,わが国では高齢化社会における家族援助の要求が家族看護学の確立を促していること,今後は家族を対象とした評価方法の開発や援助に関する予防的・実践的研究が求められていることが示唆された。The review of the literature on family nursing through numerical trend and research fields was done to know how to establish and develop nursing specialty in this area. The followings were suggested. 1) The researches concerning family, family health, and family practice were increasing in both inside and outside of Japan. 2) ln U. S. A., family nursing was developed in the field of maternal-child and psychiatric nursing, introducing family system theory. In Japan family nursing is rather essential in the field of home care for the aeed, due to aging population. 3) Further researches on development of assessment tool, intervention and social support are necessary, especially by preventive and practical points of view
Immunohistochemistry staining of Bax proteins.
<p>The analysis revealed a down-expression of Bax protein in the stomach of rats pretreated with ETHAB (d, e and f) and Omeprazole (c) compared with the ulcer control group (b) and normal group (a)(Magnification 20x).</p
Mean of total protein concentration, superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity and malondialdehyde (MDA) levels in stomach tissue homogenates of normal control, ulcer control, positive control, and ETHAB (5, 10 and 20 mg/kg) treated groups.
<p>*The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level (<i>p<0.05</i>) compared to PC.</p>#<p>The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level (<i>p<0.05</i>) compared to UC.</p
Periodic Acid Schiff (PAS) staining of mucosal glycoproteins.
<p>The observed intense magenta color in the apical epithelial cells in the groups pretreated with ETHAB (d, e and f) and Omeprazole (c) compared with the ulcer control group (b) and normal group (a)(Magnification 10x).</p
Immunohistochemistry staining of Hsp70 proteins.
<p>The analysis revealed an over expression of Hsp 70 protein in the stomach of rats pretreated with ETHAB(d, e and f) and Omeprazole (c) compared with the ulcer control group (b) and normal group (a)(Magnification 20x).</p
Histological study of acute toxicity in mice liver: (a) Mice orally administrated with 10% Tween 20 (normal group).
<p>(b) Mice orally administrated with low dose (500 mg/kg) ETHAB. (c) Mice orally administrated with high dose (1000 mg/kg) ETHAB. <b>Mice kidney</b>: (d) Mice orally administrated with 10% Tween 20 (normal group). (e) Mice orally administrated with low dose (500 mg/kg) ETHAB. (f) Mice orally administrated with high dose (1000 mg/kg) ETHAB. In all groups no lesions appear and no significant change compared to the normal control. (H&E staining, 20×).</p
IC<sub>50</sub> values based on antioxidant evaluation of ETHAB in relation to other standard compounds.
<p>All values are expressed as mean ± SEM.</p
Chemical structure of Schiff base ETHAB (ethyl-4-[(3,5-di-tert-butyl-2-hydroxybenzylidene)amino]benzoate).
<p>Chemical structure of Schiff base ETHAB (ethyl-4-[(3,5-di-tert-butyl-2-hydroxybenzylidene)amino]benzoate).</p
(a) Effect of pretreatment with ETHAB on gastric contents pH. (b) Effect of pretreatment with ETHAB on mucus weight.
<p>(c) Effect of treatment with ETHAB on the ulcer area (mm<sup>2</sup>) and ulcer inhibition (%); number rat 6/group; <i>p<0.05</i>. All results are presented as average mean ± SEM. *The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level (<i>p<0.05</i>) compared to PC. <sup>#</sup>The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level (<i>p<0.05</i>) compared to UC.</p