Adjusted relationships between 1 unit increase in youth attractiveness rating and household adult SEP outcomes.

a<p>Model 1 Adjusted for gender.</p>b<p>Model 2 additionally adjusted for all indicators of parental SEP.</p>c<p>Model 3 additionally adjusted for own education.</p>d<p>Model 4 additionally adjusted for own adult occupational class, and adult marital status (except where marital status is the outcome).</p>e<p>Model 5 additionally adjusted for adult IQ, self-assessed health, limiting longstanding illness, and self esteem.</p

Adjusted relationships between 1 unit increase in youth attractiveness rating and own adult SEP outcomes.

a<p>Model 1 Adjusted for gender.</p>b<p>Model 2 additionally adjusted for all indicators of parental SEP.</p>c<p>Model 3 additionally adjusted for own education (except where education is the outcome).</p>d<p>Model 4 additionally adjusted for own adult occupational class (except where own class is the outcome), and adult marital status.</p>e<p>Model 5 additionally adjusted for adult IQ, self-assessed health, limiting longstanding illness, and self-esteem.</p

Probability of being in a manual, as opposed to non-manual class, at age 36 by attractiveness rating.

<p>Probability of being in a manual, as opposed to non-manual class, at age 36 by attractiveness rating.</p

Estimated Difference in Telomere Length^* Associated With Education and Childhood SES Measures^†.

*<p>Telomere length measured as relative T/S ratio multiplied by 10.</p>†<p>Analysis samples are weighted to members of the baseline sample who were still alive at wave 5 and all analyses adjusted for gender and plate.</p>‡<p>Unstandardized regression coefficients.</p

Characteristics of Study Members, Including Mean Telomere Lengths^*.

*<p>All telomere length means reported are unadjusted.</p>¥<p>The high number of missing values reported here is due to the relocation of respondents to non-Scottish locations.</p>†<p>Other includes: full-time education, short-term sick, government training scheme, maternity leave or other description not included here.</p>‡<p>Advanced  =  University degree, Level 5 vocational qualification, nursing qualification, teaching qualification, or equivalent.</p><p>Basic  =  O-Levels, GCSEs, Standard Grades, A-Levels, Highers, HNC/HND, recognized trade apprenticeship, or equivalent.</p><p>None  =  none of the above.</p

Estimated Difference in Telomere Length^* Associated With Measures of SES Over Time^†.

*<p>Telomere length measured as relative T/S ratio multiplied by 10.</p>†<p>Analysis samples are weighted to members of the baseline sample who were still alive at wave 5 and all analyses adjusted for gender and plate.</p>‡<p>Unstandardized regression coefficients.</p

Results of models using age and principal component scores to predict health outcomes.

<p>PC1 includes telomere length; PC2 excludes it.</p><p>Based on N = 1867 with complete data for all measures.</p

Results of regressing measures of functioning and health on telomere length and age.

<p>Estimates are per SD of telomere T/S ratio or age.</p><p>Results weighted to the baseline sample.</p><p>All models include a random effect of telomere assay plate.</p

Supplemental Material, Supplementary_Material1 - A Randomized Controlled Trial of Strategies to Improve Family Members’ Preparedness for Surrogate Decision-Making

<p> Supplemental Material, Supplementary_Material1 for A Randomized Controlled Trial of Strategies to Improve Family Members’ Preparedness for Surrogate Decision-Making by Michael J. Green, Lauren J. Van Scoy, Andrew J. Foy, Renee R. Stewart, Ramya Sampath, Jane R. Schubart, Erik B. Lehman, Anne E.F. Dimmock, Ashley M. Bucher, Lisa S. Lehmann, Alyssa F. Harlow, Chengwu Yang, and Benjamin H. Levi in American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine® </p

Supplemental Material, Supplementary_Material2 - A Randomized Controlled Trial of Strategies to Improve Family Members’ Preparedness for Surrogate Decision-Making

<p> Supplemental Material, Supplementary_Material2 for A Randomized Controlled Trial of Strategies to Improve Family Members’ Preparedness for Surrogate Decision-Making by Michael J. Green, Lauren J. Van Scoy, Andrew J. Foy, Renee R. Stewart, Ramya Sampath, Jane R. Schubart, Erik B. Lehman, Anne E.F. Dimmock, Ashley M. Bucher, Lisa S. Lehmann, Alyssa F. Harlow, Chengwu Yang, and Benjamin H. Levi in American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine® </p