Comparison of evoked vs. spontaneous tics in a patient with trigeminal neuralgia (tic doloureux)-1

<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Comparison of evoked vs. spontaneous tics in a patient with trigeminal neuralgia (tic doloureux)"</p><p>http://www.molecularpain.com/content/3/1/34</p><p>Molecular Pain 2007;3():34-34.</p><p>Published online 6 Nov 2007</p><p>PMCID:PMC2217520.</p><p></p>al regions including anterior cingulate (ACC), insula (Ins), middle and inferior frontal (MFG, IFG), medial temporal gyrus (MTG) and inferior parietal lobe (IPL) regions show significant activation (P < 0.0001). Subcortical regions showing significant activation include the thalamus (Thal) and pontine nuclei (PN). Notably, no significant activation was observed in the cerebellum (see text). Numbers indicated the anterior posterior, sagittal or horizontal plane of the brain slice. R = Right and L = Left

Comparison of evoked vs. spontaneous tics in a patient with trigeminal neuralgia (tic doloureux)-3

<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Comparison of evoked vs. spontaneous tics in a patient with trigeminal neuralgia (tic doloureux)"</p><p>http://www.molecularpain.com/content/3/1/34</p><p>Molecular Pain 2007;3():34-34.</p><p>Published online 6 Nov 2007</p><p>PMCID:PMC2217520.</p><p></p> Ins – Insula; Amy – amygdala; Thal – thalamus; PN – pontine nuclei. R – right; L – left; P – posterior; A – anterior