Mean performance for each task.

<p><b>A</b>) Mean intensity ratings for each body odor category divided by sex of body odor donor. <b>B</b>) Mean pleasantness ratings for each body odor category divided by sex of the body odor donor. Negative values indicate ratings on the unpleasant spectra whereas positive values indicate ratings on the positive spectra. <b>C</b>) Mean discrimination performance, measured in percentage correct responses, according to comparison and donor sex. Solid line in graph represents chance performance (50%). <b>D</b>) Left hand side indicates total correct pairings of each body odor category and right hand side indicates mean correct age labeling of the body odors. In all graphs, error bars denote standard error of the mean (SEM).</p

The effect of Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) on apparent sickness, directly and via mediators including tiredness from Identification of acutely sick people and facial cues of sickness

Fig. S1. The effect of Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) on apparent sickness, directly and via the mediators Patchy skin (Pat_S), droopy mouth (Dro_M), pale lips (Pale_Lips), Glossy skin (G_S), swollen face (S_F), red eyes (R_Eye), hanging eye-lids (H_Eye), pale skin (Pale_Skin), and apparent tiredness. The effects of cues and apparent tiredness on apparent sickness are β-weights (to the right, under the heading ”Effect on apparent sickness”) and the effects of LPS correspond to Cohen's d (to the left, under the heading ”Effect on cues”). The placement of the mediator along the x-axis corresponds to the degree of mediation (per cent mediation, vertical line inside box), with 95% CI (width of the box). The scales for cues range from 1 “no symptoms” to 7 “very high symptoms”. *p<0.001, †p<0.05

Correlation matrix between facial cues from Identification of acutely sick people and facial cues of sickness

Correlation matrix between facial cues when subjects have been treated with Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)

Percentage of participants correctly identifying the culprit odor in the neutral and nosewitness condition in Experiment 1.

<p>Performance levels of conditions differ from chance and each other. Dashed line represents chance performance. *p < .05; difference between conditions (nosewitness vs. neutral). ***p < .0001; binomial probabilities indicting that the performance (in each condition) is significantly above chance.</p

Means (SE) of subjective ratings of the videos in the neutral and nosewitness conditions on a 100mm Visual Analogue Scale in Experiment 2.

<p>Note that the pleasantness scale is bipolar with 50 as neutral and with higher and lower extremes reflecting high pleasantness and high unpleasantness, respectively. * p ≤ .05, *** p< .001.</p

Means (SE) of subjective ratings of the videos in the neutral and nosewitness conditions on a 9-point rating scale in Experiment 1.

<p>Note that the pleasantness scale is bipolar with 5 as neutral and with higher and lower extremes reflecting high pleasantness and high unpleasantness, respectively. ** p < .01, *** p <.001.</p

Percentage of participants correctly identifying the culprit odor in Target-Present lineups and percentage of correct rejections and false-positives in Target-Absent lineups in the neutral and nosewitness conditions in Experiment 2. * p < .05.

<p>Percentage of participants correctly identifying the culprit odor in Target-Present lineups and percentage of correct rejections and false-positives in Target-Absent lineups in the neutral and nosewitness conditions in Experiment 2. * p < .05.</p

Descriptive Statistics of the three studies from Body odour disgust sensitivity predicts authoritarian attitudes

The ESM provides the descriptive statistics of the variables collected in the three studie

Swedish national prostate biopsy and MRI report template.

<p>1) Side (sagittal) view of the prostate, 2) ventral (coronal) view of the prostate, 3) transverse (axial) sections A-C of pictures 1) and 2). The study participants used this diagram without the colour lines to plot the prostate tumor location. The correctly plotted tumor location of case 3 is shown in the diagram (pink areas). For the scoring system picture 1) was divided in an anterior and posterior half (green line), picture 2) in a right and left half (red line) and picture 3 A-C in quadrants (blue, orange, yellow, turquoise). (MRI) magnetic resonance imaging; (SV) seminal vesicle; (a) anterior; (p) posterior; broken lines in picture 1) mark the urethra.</p

Scoring results (median with IQR) for group 1 (expert urologists) and group 2 (medical students), sub-classified for pictures 1–3 of the prostate template (side (sagittal) view, ventral (coronal) view, overall transverse (axial) view (ABC)) (s. Fig 1) in information tool A (written MRI report), information tool B (3D printed model) and information tool C (MRI presentation in MDT).

<p>Scoring results (median with IQR) for group 1 (expert urologists) and group 2 (medical students), sub-classified for pictures 1–3 of the prostate template (side (sagittal) view, ventral (coronal) view, overall transverse (axial) view (ABC)) (s. <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0199477#pone.0199477.g001" target="_blank">Fig 1</a>) in information tool A (written MRI report), information tool B (3D printed model) and information tool C (MRI presentation in MDT).</p