A comparison of dispersing media for various engineered carbon nanoparticles-5

<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "A comparison of dispersing media for various engineered carbon nanoparticles"</p><p>http://www.particleandfibretoxicology.com/content/4/1/6</p><p>Particle and Fibre Toxicology 2007;4():6-6.</p><p>Published online 27 Jul 2007</p><p>PMCID:PMC1950524.</p><p></p> SWNT from CNI, ) MWNT from SES Research, and ) MWNT from NanoLab. All particle suspensions were at 5 mg/ml. Magnification – 400×

A comparison of dispersing media for various engineered carbon nanoparticles-7

<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "A comparison of dispersing media for various engineered carbon nanoparticles"</p><p>http://www.particleandfibretoxicology.com/content/4/1/6</p><p>Particle and Fibre Toxicology 2007;4():6-6.</p><p>Published online 27 Jul 2007</p><p>PMCID:PMC1950524.</p><p></p> buffered saline (PBS), ) RPMI media with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS), ) 100% delipidated fetal calf serum (delipFCS), ) 1% tween 80 in phosphate buffer saline (PBS), ) phosphate buffered saline (PBS), and ) 100% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). All particle suspensions were at 5 mg/ml. Magnification – 400×

A comparison of dispersing media for various engineered carbon nanoparticles-15

<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "A comparison of dispersing media for various engineered carbon nanoparticles"</p><p>http://www.particleandfibretoxicology.com/content/4/1/6</p><p>Particle and Fibre Toxicology 2007;4():6-6.</p><p>Published online 27 Jul 2007</p><p>PMCID:PMC1950524.</p><p></p>SWNT from CNI, ) MWNT from SES Research, and ) MWNT from NanoLab. All particle suspensions were at 5 mg/ml. Magnification – 400×

A comparison of dispersing media for various engineered carbon nanoparticles-14

<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "A comparison of dispersing media for various engineered carbon nanoparticles"</p><p>http://www.particleandfibretoxicology.com/content/4/1/6</p><p>Particle and Fibre Toxicology 2007;4():6-6.</p><p>Published online 27 Jul 2007</p><p>PMCID:PMC1950524.</p><p></p>SWNT from CNI, ) MWNT from SES Research, and ) MWNT from NanoLab. All particle suspensions were at 5 mg/ml. Magnification – 400×

A comparison of dispersing media for various engineered carbon nanoparticles-9

<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "A comparison of dispersing media for various engineered carbon nanoparticles"</p><p>http://www.particleandfibretoxicology.com/content/4/1/6</p><p>Particle and Fibre Toxicology 2007;4():6-6.</p><p>Published online 27 Jul 2007</p><p>PMCID:PMC1950524.</p><p></p> SWNT from CNI, ) MWNT from SES Research, and ) MWNT from NanoLab. All particle suspensions were at 5 mg/ml. Magnification – 400×

A comparison of dispersing media for various engineered carbon nanoparticles-10

<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "A comparison of dispersing media for various engineered carbon nanoparticles"</p><p>http://www.particleandfibretoxicology.com/content/4/1/6</p><p>Particle and Fibre Toxicology 2007;4():6-6.</p><p>Published online 27 Jul 2007</p><p>PMCID:PMC1950524.</p><p></p>SWNT from CNI, ) MWNT from SES Research, and ) MWNT from NanoLab. All particle suspensions were at 5 mg/ml. Magnification – 400×

A comparison of dispersing media for various engineered carbon nanoparticles-11

<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "A comparison of dispersing media for various engineered carbon nanoparticles"</p><p>http://www.particleandfibretoxicology.com/content/4/1/6</p><p>Particle and Fibre Toxicology 2007;4():6-6.</p><p>Published online 27 Jul 2007</p><p>PMCID:PMC1950524.</p><p></p>SWNT from CNI, ) MWNT from SES Research, and ) MWNT from NanoLab. All particle suspensions were at 5 mg/ml. Magnification – 400×

A comparison of dispersing media for various engineered carbon nanoparticles-12

<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "A comparison of dispersing media for various engineered carbon nanoparticles"</p><p>http://www.particleandfibretoxicology.com/content/4/1/6</p><p>Particle and Fibre Toxicology 2007;4():6-6.</p><p>Published online 27 Jul 2007</p><p>PMCID:PMC1950524.</p><p></p>SWNT from CNI, ) MWNT from SES Research, and ) MWNT from NanoLab. All particle suspensions were at 5 mg/ml. Magnification – 400×

A comparison of dispersing media for various engineered carbon nanoparticles-0

<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "A comparison of dispersing media for various engineered carbon nanoparticles"</p><p>http://www.particleandfibretoxicology.com/content/4/1/6</p><p>Particle and Fibre Toxicology 2007;4():6-6.</p><p>Published online 27 Jul 2007</p><p>PMCID:PMC1950524.</p><p></p> SWNT from CNI, ) MWNT from SES Research, and ) MWNT from NanoLab. All particle suspensions were at 5 mg/ml. Magnification – 400×

A comparison of dispersing media for various engineered carbon nanoparticles-3

<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "A comparison of dispersing media for various engineered carbon nanoparticles"</p><p>http://www.particleandfibretoxicology.com/content/4/1/6</p><p>Particle and Fibre Toxicology 2007;4():6-6.</p><p>Published online 27 Jul 2007</p><p>PMCID:PMC1950524.</p><p></p> SWNT from CNI, ) MWNT from SES Research, and ) MWNT from NanoLab. All particle suspensions were at 5 mg/ml. Magnification – 400×