Factor loadings obtained in the principal component analysis (n = 801).

<p>Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.</p><p>Rotation Method: Oblimin with Kaiser Normalization.</p><p>a Rotation converged in 5 iterations.</p

Component Plot and rotated space of the exploratory two- factor solution.

<p>Component Plot and rotated space of the exploratory two- factor solution.</p

Correlation coefficients among the variables of balance included in the model.

<p>*Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).</p><p>**Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).</p

Month 0 (baseline) characteristics of intervention and control groups.

<p>SD = standard deviation; IR = interquartile range; MET = metabolic equivalent.</p

Flowchart of participant’s recruitment and trial design.

<p><i>Note:</i> During follow-ups of both the intervention and the control groups, some participants were contacted by phone, increasing the number of attendees from previous follow-up.</p

Measures of self-reported health status.

<p><i>Note:</i> Means and standard deviations are reported for each outcome measure at month 0 and at month 3, 9 and 15 until completion of the study. Means were generated using participants with data at least three time points for the outcome of interest. P-values are based on linear mixed modelling. An increase in the scores of the SF-12 scales means an improvement in the perceived rate of wellbeing.</p>*<p>P-values are interpreted from the results of comparisons between specific time points. When the p-value interpreted is from the group-by-time interaction effect, the change between two time points for the two groups is compared.</p>**<p>Bonferroni post-hoc tests were used with significant interactions in the IG (p<.001).</p><p>IG = intervention group; CG = control group; PF = physical function; PCS = physical composite score; MCS = mental composite score; SD = standard deviation; CI = confidence interval.</p

Effects of the exercise program on the total number of visits and variation of visits (before-after) at month 15.

<p>Note: Mann Whitney U test was performed unless indicated.</p>*<p>Chi Square test was performed.</p><p>IG = Intervention group; CG = Control group; V = variation of visits (before-after); SD = standard deviation; IR = interquartile range; CI = confidence interval; PHC = Primary Healthcare Centers.</p

Change in average waist circumference for the intervention and comparison groups across program phases.

<p>Change in average waist circumference for the intervention and comparison groups across program phases.</p

Change in average occupational sitting time for the intervention and comparison groups across program phases.

<p>Change in average occupational sitting time for the intervention and comparison groups across program phases.</p

Additional file 1 of Prevalence of urinary incontinence and associated factors in nursing homes: a multicentre cross-sectional study

Supplementary Material 1: Appendix A. Table A1. Additional sociodemographic and health-related information of the sample of NH residents (n=132) from Osona, Spain (2020). Table A2. Bivariate analysis between UI and categorical variables (with p value higher than 0.20) in NH residents from Osona, Spain (2020)