Treatment of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP), characterized by thrombocytopenia and microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia, was almost universally fatal until the introduction of plasma exchange (PE) therapy in the 1970s. Based on clinical studies, daily PE has become the first-choice therapy since 1991. Recent findings may explain its effectiveness, which may include, in particular, the removal of anti-ADAMTS13 autoantibodies and unusually large von Willebrand factor multimers and/or supply of ADAMTS13 in acquired idiopathic or congenital TTP. Based on currently available data, the favoured PE regimen is daily PE [involving replacement of 1-1.5 times the patient's plasma volume with fresh-frozen plasma (FFP)] until remission. Adverse events of treatment are mainly related to central venous catheters. The potential reduction of plasma related side-effects, such as transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI) or febrile transfusion reactions by use of solvent-detergent treated (S/D) plasma instead of FFP is not established by controlled clinical studies. Uncontrolled clinical observations and the hypothesis of an autoimmune process in a significant part of the patients with acquired idiopathic TTP suggest a beneficial effect of adjunctive therapy with corticosteroids. Other immunosuppressive treatments are not tested in controlled trials and should be reserved for refractory or relapsing disease. There is no convincing evidence for the use of antiplatelet agents. Supportive treatment with transfusion of red blood cells or platelets has to be evaluated on a clinical basis, but the transfusion trigger for platelets should be very restrictive. Further controlled, prospective studies should consider the different pathophysiological features of thrombotic microangiopathies, address the prognostic significance of ADAMTS13 and explore alternative exchange fluids to FFP, the role of immunosuppressive therapies and of new plasma saving approaches as recombinant ADAMTS13 and protein A immunoadsorption

Severe nose bleeding after intake of acetylsalicylic acid: von Willebrand disease type 2A. Case 9

This case report of a school boy with a history of severe and repeated episodes of epistaxis presents a short overview of the clinical and laboratory findings which lead to confirm the suspected diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (vWD). Suspicion of defective primary haemostasis should arise when unusual (because of their number or duration) mucosal bleeds appear in an otherwise normal and healthy patient. Because of its definitive inhibitory effect on platelet aggregation, acetylsalicylic acid (more than other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs exerting unselective inhibition of cyclooxygenase) is a strong factor in triggering or sustaining the bleeding disorders in these patients. Among the congenital disorder of primary haemostasis, vWD is by far the most frequent one. The difficulties of laboratory diagnosis of vWD are stressed; the promises and pitfalls of new in vitro methods for measuring primary haemostasis (PFA-100 analyzer) are discussed. An accurate diagnosis of the specific type of vWD is of critical importance for correct patient management as well as for genetic counseling

[Measures for allogeneic blood conservation in surgery]

The aim of all efforts to reduce the need of allogeneic blood transfusions is to avoid associated risks. There should particularly be a favourable effect according to the rate of transfusion-transmitted virus infections and immunological side-effects. The acceptance of an individually adjusted lowest haematocrit level and the minimisation of intra-operative blood loss by the application of optimal surgical techniques are among the most essential strategies to reduce or even avoid allogeneic blood transfusions. In addition the following interventions are generally accepted: Preoperative autologous blood donation, where appropriate supported by erythropoietin Preoperative haemodilution, where appropriate supported by erythropoietin Intra- and postoperative blood salvage Topical or systemic pharmacologic interventions to accelerate haemostasis Controlled hypotension Efficacy and indication of the different measures always depend on the individual circumstances of the specific patient. Therefore one should develop an individual approach for every case. In this context the most important subjects are an optimal coordination and if required an appropriate combination of the discussed methods. Algorithms which preoperatively allow approximate calculation of expected transfusion need may be a meaningful tool to facilitate blood conservation planning. However, at the same time one must consider that all strategies to reduce allogeneic transfusion needs are also associated with particular risks. Therefore one has to weigh carefully the pros and cons prior to their application, including the possible alternative of allogeneic transfusion in one's decision making process

High incidence of reversible renal toxicity of dose-intensified bendamustine-based high-dose chemotherapy in lymphoma and myeloma patients

INTRODUCTION High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT)/autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard for patients with relapsed/refractory lymphomas and multiple myeloma (MM), thereby improving DFS and OS. Relapse after HDCT/ASCT remains the major cause of death in patients with lymphomas or MM after melphalan-based HDCT. Dose-intensified bendamustine by replacing carmustine in the BEAM regimen (BeEAM) or by combining it with melphalan (BenMel) is a promising strategy to lower the relapse rates.Renal toxicity after BeEAM emerges as a major concern. METHODS We investigated renal toxicity in consecutive lymphoma patients treated with BeEAM and in consecutive MM patients treated with the same dose of 400 mg/m2 bendamustine (split into 200 mg/m2 on two consecutive days) together with full-dosed (200 mg/m2) melphalan. Patients with a history of renal impairment before HDCT were included. We assessed renal damage summarized as acute kidney injury (AKI) by measuring renal parameters on a daily basis starting from the first day of HDCT until the last day of hospitalization for HDCT/ASCT. AKI: rise of s-creatinine 6526.5 \u3bcmol/L in 48 hours or increase to more than or equal to twofold compared to baseline s-creatinine within 7 days (Kidney Disease International Global Organization, KDIGO, criteria). Grading of AKI: KDIGO. Treatment-related AKI (rAKI): occurred within 10 days from the last administration of bendamustine; no relation to sepsis. Consequently, we defined as treatment-unrelated AKI (uAKI) all renal damage occurring because of sepsis or later than 10 days since the last administration of bendamustine. Statistical Analysis Subgroup differences: Chi-squared test, Fisher Exact test. IBM SPSS software version 21. RESULTS Patient characteristics and therapy regimen: 122 consecutive patients with lymphomas or MM who underwent high- dose bendamustine regimen before ASCT in 01/2013-06/2016. Factors related to rAKIOccurrence of rAKI: correlated (p<0.05) with age >60 years, previous AKI, cardiovascular comorbidities and concomitant nephrotoxic drugs. In addition, rAKI correlated (p=0.004) with cardiovascular complications during hospitalization; details of subgroups analysis: Table 2.No differences in the incidence of rAKI MM (n=7/15; 46.7%) and lymphoma patients (n=44/107; 41.1%), p=0.683. Acute kidney Injury related to High Dose Bendamustine is reversible and manageable \u2022 Acute kidney injury related to bendamustine (rAKI): in 51 patients (41.8%); completely reversible in n=50/51 (98.0%). \u2022 rAKI: mild to moderate in 90% of affected patients; did not increase TRM after ASCT. \u2022 3/51 patients (5.9%) with rAKI required transient renal dialysis to enable recovery from renal damage, whereas approaches such as additional hydration were sufficient in the vast majority (n=48 with rAKI; 94.1% of this subgroup). \u2022 The median duration of rAKI was 7 days (range, 1-22). \uad According to Cox ZL et al., Adverse Drug Events during AKI and its recovery, Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2013; 8:1070-1078. CONCLUSION \u2022 Our data suggest that treatment-related acute renal toxicity is common in lymphoma and MM patients receiving dose-intensified bendamustine HDCT before ASCT. \u2022 However, renal impairment is reversible and manageable. \u2022 Our data identify a subgroup of patients at increased risk for the development of renal damage following bendamustine-based HDCT. \u2022 Such patients should be strictly monitored during hospitalization, and a generous hydration strategy before, during and after administration of bendamustine is recommended. \u2022 Assessing the pre-transplant renal risk profile may help to identify those patients, which may not be candidates for bendamustine-based HDCT thereby avoiding prolonged hospitalization due to rAKI and eventual transient dialysis treatment. \u2022 Our results may contribute to design appropriate selection criteria for dose-intensified bendamustine as part of the conditioning regimens preceding HDCT/ASCT in lymphoma and MM patients

NSAID treatment with meloxicam enhances peripheral stem cell mobilization in myeloma.

Chemotherapy with G-CSF is used to mobilize peripheral stem cells in multiple myeloma (MM) patients, with plerixafor as a rescue strategy for poorly mobilizing patients. Preclinical studies suggested that the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug meloxicam enhances the mobilization of CD34+ cells. In this single-center study, we evaluated whether adding meloxicam to chemotherapy/G-CSF mobilization increases peripheral hematopoietic CD34+ cell levels and reduces the need of using plerixafor. We prospectively compared two consecutive cohorts of MM patients in first remission mobilized with G-CSF and non-myelosuppressive chemotherapy with vinorelbine or gemcitabine. The second cohort additionally received oral meloxicam. The cohorts comprised 84 patients without meloxicam (-M) and 66 patients with meloxicam (+M). Meloxicam was well tolerated and associated with similar hematologic engraftment after transplantation and equal survival rates. However, the meloxicam group had higher CD34+ cell levels on day 8 of the mobilization procedure (53 200 versus 35 600 CD34+ cells/mL; P=0.007), and fewer patients needed >1 collection day (+M: 6 (9%) patients versus -M: 16 (19%) patients; P=0.04). This resulted in reduced plerixafor administrations (+M: 7 (11%) patients versus -M: 18 (21%) patients; P=0.03) and less costs. Our data suggest that meloxicam enhances the mobilization of hematopoietic CD34+ blood cells in MM patients.Bone Marrow Transplantation advance online publication, 23 October 2017; doi:10.1038/bmt.2017.234