3 research outputs found

    Dynamic cerebral autoregulation measurement using rapid changes in head positioning: experiences in acute ischemic stroke and healthy control populations

    Full text link
    The ideal technique for dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA) assessment in critically ill patients should provide considerable variability in blood pressure (BP) but without the need for patient cooperation. We proposed using rapid head positioning (RHP) over spontaneous BP fluctuations for dCA assessment in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Cerebral blood velocity (transcranial Doppler), beat-to-beat BP (Finometer), and end-tidal CO2 (capnography) were recorded during 5-min baseline and RHP in 16 controls (8 women and 8 men, mean age: 57 ± 16 yr) and 15 patients with AIS (7 women and 8 men, mean age: 69 ± 8 yr) at two (12 ± 8 days) and three visits (13.3 ± 6.9 h, 4.8 ± 3.2 days, and 93.9 ± 11.5 days from the symptom onset), respectively. All participants were able to complete the RHP protocol without difficulty. Compared with controls, patients with AIS were hypocapnic (all visits, P < 0.0024) and hypertensive ( visit 1, P = 0.011), although BP gradually reduced after the acute phase. RHP demonstrated greater beat-to-beat BP variability (BPV) in controls ( visits 1 and 2, P < 0.001) but not in patients with AIS at any visit. Compared with controls, a reduced autoregulation index (ARI) was demonstrated in patients with AIS, at visit 2 for the baseline recording but not at other visits or during RHP. The area under the receiver-operating curve was 0.53 and 0.54 for baseline and RHP, respectively. The RHP paradigm required minimal patient cooperation and could be considered a feasible alternative for assessing dCA, mainly in conditions leading to increased BPV. The lack of BPV increase in AIS with RHP deserves further investigation. NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study used rapid head positioning (RHP) to enhance blood pressure (BP) variability (BPV) to improve BP signal-to-noise ratio and reliability of dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA). RHP was well accepted by controls and acute ischemic stroke (AIS); the increased BPV induced in controls was not observed in AIS, suggesting BPV at rest was already elevated. RHP did not improve detection of impaired CA in AIS; further work is needed to understand the different responses observed

    Cerebral autoregulation and response to intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke

    No full text
    We hypothesized that knowledge of cerebral autoregulation (CA) status during recanalization therapies could guide further studies aimed at neuroprotection targeting penumbral tissue, especially in patients that do not respond to therapy. Thus, we assessed CA status of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) during intravenous r-tPA therapy and associated CA with response to therapy. AIS patients eligible for intravenous r-tPA therapy were recruited. Cerebral blood flow velocities (transcranial Doppler) from middle cerebral artery and blood pressure (Finometer) were recorded to calculate the autoregulation index (ARI, as surrogate for CA). National Institute of Health Stroke Score was assessed and used to define responders to therapy (improvement of ≥ 4 points on NIHSS measured 24–48 h after therapy). CA was considered impaired if ARI < 4. In 38 patients studied, compared to responders, non-responders had significantly lower ARI values (affected hemisphere: 5.0 vs. 3.6; unaffected hemisphere: 5.4 vs. 4.4, p = 0.03) and more likely to have impaired CA (32% vs. 62%, p = 0.02) during thrombolysis. In conclusion, CA during thrombolysis was impaired in patients who did not respond to therapy. This variable should be investigated as a predictor of the response to therapy and to subsequent neurological outcome

    Can we use short recordings for assessment of dynamic cerebral autoregulation? A sensitivity analysis study in acute ischaemic stroke and healthy subjects.

    Full text link
    Objective: It is unclear whether the duration of recordings influences estimates of dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA). Therefore, we performed a retrospective study of the effects of reducing recording durations on dCA estimates; with the potential to inform recording duration for reliable estimates in challenging clinical populations. Approach: Seventy-eight healthy control subjects and 79 acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) patients were included. Cerebral blood flow velocity was recorded with transcranial Doppler and continuous blood pressure with the Finapres device. The autoregulation index (ARI), derived with transfer function analysis, was calculated for recording durations at one-minute intervals between 1 and 5 minutes using the same starting point of each recording. Main results: Though recording duration did not affect the overall ARI value, when compared to control subjects, AIS patients had significantly lower ARI values for durations between 3 and 5 (p<0.0001), but not 1 and 2 minutes. The intraclass correlation coefficient of all participants, for reproducibility of the five recording durations, was 0.69. AIS patients classified as having impaired cerebral autoregulation (CA; ARI≤4) at 5 min, had a 7.1% rate of false negatives for both 4 and 3 min recordings, reaching 42.9% for 1 min recording. The percentage of false-positives also increased with reduced recording durations (from 0% at 5 to 16.2% at 1 minute). Significance: Reducing recording durations from 5 to 3 min can still provide reliable estimates of ARI, and may facilitate CA studies in potentially medically unstable AIS patients, as well as in other patient groups
    corecore