10 research outputs found

    Tunneling Plasmonics in Bilayer Graphene

    No full text
    We report experimental signatures of plasmonic effects due to electron tunneling between adjacent graphene layers. At subnanometer separation, such layers can form either a strongly coupled bilayer graphene with a Bernal stacking or a weakly coupled double-layer graphene with a random stacking order. Effects due to interlayer tunneling dominate in the former case but are negligible in the latter. We found through infrared nanoimaging that bilayer graphene supports plasmons with a higher degree of confinement compared to single- and double-layer graphene, a direct consequence of interlayer tunneling. Moreover, we were able to shut off plasmons in bilayer graphene through gating within a wide voltage range. Theoretical modeling indicates that such a plasmon-off region is directly linked to a gapped insulating state of bilayer graphene, yet another implication of interlayer tunneling. Our work uncovers essential plasmonic properties in bilayer graphene and suggests a possibility to achieve novel plasmonic functionalities in graphene few-layers

    Quartile-quartile boxplot with genotype rs1044396 effects on event-related potential N100 amplitude (standardized values at electrode position Cz) in the general population.

    No full text
    <p>a) <i>Top</i>: Genotype effects in the entire sample (males and females). <i>Bottom</i>: Genotype effects separately depicted for males and females. Stepwise linear regression analysis of the event-related potential N100 at vertex electrode position Cz, with age, gender, education, smoking status and study site as covariates and testing for up to 3-factor interactions among the predictors, revealed a significant genotype effect (for details see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0152984#sec008" target="_blank">results</a> section). b) Functional neuroimaging sLORETA current density analyses of genotype groups with covariates age, gender, study site. <i>Top</i>: Current density for genotype groups (<i>P</i> < 0.01). <i>Bottom</i>: genotype group contrasts (t-values corrected for multiple testing). Independent of genotype, the strongest N100 activation maximum is seen in the left temporal lobe followed by a maximum in the frontal lobe mostly in the left hemisphere. This is consistent with intracortical recordings [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0152984#pone.0152984.ref044" target="_blank">44</a>–<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0152984#pone.0152984.ref046" target="_blank">46</a>] as well as earlier LORETA studies conducted by us [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0152984#pone.0152984.ref021" target="_blank">21</a>, <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0152984#pone.0152984.ref023" target="_blank">23</a>] using comparable task conditions. For details on genotype effects see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0152984#sec008" target="_blank">result</a> section.</p
    corecore