Measurement of Harm Outcomes in Older Adults after Hospital Discharge: Reliability and Validity

Objectives. Defining and validating a measure of safety contributes to further validation of clinical measures. The objective was to define and examine the psychometric properties of the outcome “incidents of harm.” Methods. The Incident of Harm Caregiver Questionnaire was administered to caregivers of older adults discharged from hospital by telephone. Caregivers completed daily logs for one month and medical charts were examined. Results. Test-retest reliability (n = 38) was high for the occurrence of an incident of harm (yes/no; kappa = 1.0) and the type of incident (agreement = 100%). Validation against daily logs found no disagreement regarding occurrence or types of incidents. Validation with medical charts found no disagreement regarding incident occurrence and disagreement in half regarding incident type. Discussion. The data support the Incident of Harm Caregiver Questionnaire as a reliable and valid estimation of incidents for this sample and are important to researchers as a method to measure safety when validating clinical measures

Use of the Cognitive Performance Test for Identifying Deficits in Hospitalized Older Adults

Objectives. The Cognitive Performance Test (CPT) is a functional assessment for persons with dementia. The study purpose was to evaluate the reliability, discriminant, and concurrent validity of the CPT. Method. The CPT was tested against other measures of cognition (Standardized Mini Mental Status Exam (SMMSE) and Assessment of Motor and Process Skills-Process scale (AMPS-Process)). Participants were persons 65 years and older admitted to a geriatric rehabilitation unit (n = 47). Results. The CPT correlated moderately with measures of cognition (SMMSE r = 0.47, AMPS-Process r = 0.53, P < 0.01), and ADL burden of care (FIM r = 0.32, P < 0.05). Scores were not affected by age, sex, years of education, motor skills, or comorbidities. The CPT differentiated between impaired and unimpaired individuals differently from other measures. Conclusion. While CPT appears related to other measures of cognition, test interpretation requires noting the variability between CPT scores and those measures

The Development of Theory- and Evidence-based Educational Workshops for Occupational Therapists

The Do-Live-Well (DLW) framework is a health promotion approach developed by Canadian occupational therapists (OTs). As the DLW framework is relatively new, it has not been widely adopted by OTs. In order to facilitate OTs to incorporate the DLW concepts in their practice, there should be more learning opportunities, and online and in-person workshops have been chosen to be a specific interest of this study. The purpose of this project was to develop theory- and evidence-based in-person and online educational workshops for OTs as a pre-implementation study to increase the knowledge of the DLW framework among OTs. In order to develop workshops, we incorporated three different phases. First, we interviewed four OTs who have been applying the DLW concepts in practice to understand their use of the framework and training needs. It was identified that OTs experienced difficulty applying the DLW concepts in practice and wanted opportunities to learn more about the DLW framework. Next, problem-based learning (PBL) guided the workshop development, and the same eight key PBL principles were incorporated in both the in-person and online workshops. Finally, four different experts completed usability testing of the online workshop website to improve its learning environment. The online workshop website was improved based on the feedback from the usability testers. The next step of this research will be to compare effectiveness of in-person and online platforms for workshop delivery. The detailed development process described in this project may assist occupational therapy educators in developing theory- and evidence-based educational delivery methods

Does Policy Impact Equitable Access to Services? A Critical Discourse Analysis of Discharge Policies in Paediatric Rehabilitation

Having the choice to access rehabilitation services is a right of disabled children. In Ontario, Canada, paediatric rehabilitation services are provided by Children’s Treatment Centres (CTCs), and many manage missed appointments using discharge policies. The impact of discharge policies on access to rehabilitation services is unknown. This study critically examined the language of policies around missed appointments and impacts on service access. Using qualitative critical discourse analysis, text from discharge policies was analysed, considering how marginalised groups (e.g., low-income families, culturally diverse families) may be affected by CTC discharge policies. Discourses of family-centred service, health equity and the perpetuation of established power relations within paediatric rehabilitation were represented in the language of policies. Current policies place the organisation in a position of power, de-value family choice and risk infringing on the right of disabled children to access paediatric rehabilitation services when desired

Monitoring physical functioning as the sixth vital sign: evaluating patient and practice engagement in chronic illness care in a primary care setting--a quasi-experimental design

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In Canada, one in three adults or almost 9 million people report having a chronic condition. Over two thirds of total deaths result from cardiovascular disease, diabetes, cancer and respiratory illness and 77% of persons ≥65 years have at least one chronic condition. Persons with chronic disease are at risk for functional decline; as a result, there is an increased awareness of the significance of functional status as an important health outcome. The purpose of this study was to determine whether patients who receive a multi-component rehabilitation intervention, including online monitoring of function with feedback and self-management workshops, showed less functional decline than case matched controls who did not receive this intervention. In addition, we wanted to determine whether capacity building initiatives within the Family Health Team promote a collaborative approach to Chronic Disease Management.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A population-based multi-component rehabilitation intervention delivered to persons with chronic illnesses (≥ 44 yrs) (n = 60) was compared to a group of age and sex matched controls (n = 60) with chronic illnesses receiving usual care within a primary healthcare setting. The population-based intervention consisted of four main components: (1) function-based individual assessment and action planning, (2) rehabilitation self-management workshops, (3) on-line self-assessment of function and (4) organizational capacity building. T-tests and chi-square tests were used for continuous and categorical variables respectively in baseline comparison between groups.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Two MANOVA showed significant between group differences in patient reported physical functioning (Λ = 0.88, F = (2.86) = 5.97. p = 0.004) and for the physical performance measures collectively as the dependent variable (Λ = 0.80, F = (6.93) = 3.68. p = 0.0025). There were no within group differences for the capacity measures.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>It is feasible to monitor physical functioning as a health outcome for persons with chronic illness in primary care. The timeline for this study was not sufficient to show an increase in the capacity within the team; however there were some differences in patient outcomes. The short timeline was likely not sufficient to build the capacity required to support this approach.</p> <p>Trial registration</p> <p><a href="http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00859638">NCT00859638</a></p

Co-designing solutions to enhance access and engagement in pediatric telerehabilitation

IntroductionPrior to the COVID-19 pandemic, children's therapy appointments provided by Ontario's publicly-funded Children's Treatment Centre (CTCs) primarily occurred in-person. With COVID-19 restrictions, CTCs offered services via telerehabilitation (e.g., video, phone), which remains a part of service delivery. CTC data shows that families experience barriers in attending telerehabilitation appointments and may need supports in place to ensure service accessibility. Our study aimed to co-design innovative solutions to enhance access and engagement in ambulatory pediatric telerehabilitation services. This manuscript reports the co-design process and findings related to solution development.MethodsThis research project used an experience based co-design (EBCD) approach, where caregivers, clinicians and CTC management worked together to improve experience with telerehabilitation services. Interview data were collected from 27 caregivers and 27 clinicians to gain an in-depth understanding of their barriers and successes with telerehabilitation. Next, 4 interactive co-design meetings were held with caregivers, clinicians and CTC management to address priorities identified during the interviews. Using qualitative content analysis, data from the interviews and co-design meetings were analyzed and findings related to the solutions developed are presented.FindingsFour topics were identified from the interview data that were selected as focii for the co-design meetings. Findings from the co-design meetings emphasized the importance of communication, consistency and connection (the 3C's) in experiences with telerehabilitation. The 3C's are represented in the co-designed solutions aimed at changing organizational processes and generating tools and resources for telerehabilitation services.DiscussionThe 3C's influence experiences with telerehabilitation services. By enhancing the experience with telerehabilitation, families will encounter fewer barriers to accessing and engaging in this service delivery model

Undertaking Rehabilitation Research During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Emergent Strategies From a Trainee-Faculty Workshop

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted everyday rehabilitation research. Many academic institutions have halted in-person human research including rehabilitation sciences. Researchers are faced with several barriers to continuing their research programs. The purpose of this perspective article is to report the results of an interdisciplinary workshop aimed at understanding the challenges and corresponding strategies for conducting rehabilitation research during the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsTwenty-five rehabilitation researchers (17 trainees and eight faculty) attended a 2-h facilitated online workshop in to discuss challenges and strategies they had experienced and employed to conduct rehabilitation research during the COVID-19 pandemic.ResultsRehabilitation researchers reported challenges with (1) pandemic protocol adjustments, (2) participant accessibility, and (3) knowledge dissemination, along with corresponding strategies to these challenges. Researchers experienced disruptions in study outcomes and intervention protocols to adhere to public health guidelines and have suggested implementing novel virtual approaches and study toolkits to facilitate offsite assessment. Participant accessibility could be improved by engaging community stakeholders in protocol revisions to ensure equity, safety, and feasibility. Researchers also experienced barriers to virtual conferences and publication, suggested opportunities for smaller networking events, and revisiting timeframes for knowledge dissemination.ConclusionThis perspective article served as a catalyst for discussion among rehabilitation researchers to identify novel and creative approaches that address the complexities of conducting rehabilitation research during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond

Participants&rsquo; Evaluation and Outcomes following Integration of Self-Management Support into Outpatient Schizophrenia Case Management

(1) Background: Self-management is advocated as a feasible, effective intervention to support individuals to actively manage the impact of illness and live healthier lives. We sought to evaluate a piloted self-management model, SET for Health, tailored for individuals living with schizophrenia embedded within ambulatory case management. (2) Methods: A mixed-methods design engaged 40 adults living with schizophrenia in the SET for Health protocol. Functional and symptomatic outcomes were measured by self-report and clinician ratings at baseline and completion of self-management plans, on average one year later. Semi-structured qualitative client interviews invited evaluations of personal experiences with the intervention. (3) Results: Significant improvements were found concerning client illness severity, social and occupational functioning, illness management and functional recovery with reductions in emergency visits and days in hospital. Clients endorsed the value of the intervention. Baseline clinical characteristics did not predict who benefited. Participation contributed to motivational gains and quality of life. (4) Conclusions: Results confirmed self-management support embedded within traditional case management improved clients&rsquo; clinical and functional status, and contributed to quality of life. Clients engaged in their recovery and actively used self-management strategies. Self-management can be successfully adopted by clients with schizophrenia regardless of age, gender, education, illness severity or duration