4 research outputs found

    Bivariate relationships between plant species richness and the diversity indices.

    No full text
    <p>abundance (a and b), species richness (c and d), Shannon evenness (e and f) and dominance (g and h) for herbivores (left panel) and carnivores (right panel). All response variables were standardized by removing the block effect, ie by substracting from each experimental unit (n = 80) the average value measured in the respective block. Abundance was log10-transformed and evenness logit-transformed. The lines show fitted regression lines from linear models, and solid lines indicate significant diversity effects (p <0.05). The <b>R</b><sup><b>2</b></sup> values were taken from the linear models. Diversity indices and the fitted regression lines from the models were back-transformed to the original scale.</p

    SEM’s representing plant community effects on arthropod diversity indices.

    No full text
    <p>Effects of plant sown richness, total plant biomass and the presence/absence of the four plant functional groups on abundance (a and b), species richness (c and d), Shannon evenness (e and f) and dominance (g and h) for herbivores (left panels) and carnivores (right panels). The reported path coefficients are standardized, and colored paths are significant at the 0.05 level. Blue paths have a positive path coefficient, whereas red paths have a negative one. We report the p-value for the Chi-square test of the SEM’s along with the p-value for the root mean square error (RMSEA). R<sup><b>2</b></sup> value for the diversity indices are given in the indices box.</p
    corecore