14 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
Iatrogenic pleuropulmonary charcoal instillation in a teenager
Predictive value of the Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index in the surgical management of ulcerative colitis.
PURPOSE: The primary purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index (PUCAI) and operative management. We also specifically evaluated those patients receiving tacrolimus for their disease.
METHODS: A retrospective review (1/06-1/11) identified ulcerative colitis patients (≤21 years old) undergoing restorative proctocolectomy with rectal mucosectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Main outcomes included pre-operative PUCAI, combined versus staged procedure, and postoperative complications. Patients receiving tacrolimus within 3 months of surgical intervention were identified. PUCAI at tacrolimus induction and medication side effects were also noted.
RESULTS: Sixty patients were identified. Forty-two (70%) underwent combined and 18 (30%) had staged procedures. Pre-operative PUCAI was lower for combined versus staged patients (p = \u3c 0.001). Furthermore, a higher pre-operative PUCAI strongly correlated with the likelihood of undergoing a staged procedure (p \u3c 0.001). Forty-four patients (73%) received tacrolimus. Significant improvement in their PUCAI was noted from induction to pre-operative evaluation (p \u3c 0.001). Minor and reversible side effects occurred in 46% of patients receiving tacrolimus, but complication rates were not significantly different.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a very strong correlation between the PUCAI and the likelihood of undergoing a staged procedure. A significant improvement in PUCAI occurs following preoperative tacrolimus therapy
Recommended from our members
Bronchial Atresia is Common to Extralobar Sequestration, Intralobar Sequestration, Congenital Cystic Adenomatoid Malformation, and Lobar Emphysema
The effort and outcomes of the Pediatric Surgery match process: Are we interviewing too many?
Purpose: Increasing numbers of programs participating in the pediatric surgery match has resulted in economic and logistical issues for candidates, General Surgery residencies, and Pediatric Surgery training programs (PSTP). We sought to determine the ideal number of interviews conducted by programs based on resultant rank order lists (ROL) of matched candidates.Methods: PSTPs received 4 online surveys regarding interview practices (2011-2012, 2014), and matched candidate ROL (2008-2010, 2012, 2014). Program directors (PD) also provided estimates regarding minimum candidate interview numbers necessary for an effective match (2011-2012, 2014). Kruskal-Wallis equality-of-populations rank tests compared ROL and interview numbers conducted. Quartile regression predicted ROL based on the interview numbers. Wilcoxon signed rank-sum tests compared the interview numbers to the minimal interview number using a matched pair. p Values\u3c0.05 were significant.Results: Survey response rates ranged from 85-100%. Median ROL of matched candidates (2-3.5) did not differ between programs (p=0.09) and the lowest matched ROL for any year was 10-12. Interview numbers did not affect the final candidate ROL (p=0.22). While PDs thought the minimum median interview number should be 20, the number actually conducted was significantly higher (p\u3c0.001).Conclusion: These data suggest that PSTPs interview excessive numbers of candidates. Programs and applicants should evaluate mechanisms to reduce interviews to limit costs and effort associated with the match
The Effort and Outcomes of the Pediatric Surgery Match Process: Are We Interviewing Too Many?
PURPOSE: Increasing numbers of programs participating in the pediatric surgery match has resulted in economic and logistical issues for candidates, General Surgery residencies, and Pediatric Surgery training programs (PSTP). We sought to determine the ideal number of interviews conducted by programs based on resultant rank order lists (ROL) of matched candidates.
METHODS: PSTPs received 4 online surveys regarding interview practices (2011-2012, 2014), and matched candidate ROL (2008-2010, 2012, 2014). Program directors (PD) also provided estimates regarding minimum candidate interview numbers necessary for an effective match (2011-2012, 2014). Kruskal-Wallis equality-of-populations rank tests compared ROL and interview numbers conducted. Quartile regression predicted ROL based on the interview numbers. Wilcoxon signed rank-sum tests compared the interview numbers to the minimal interview number using a matched pair. p Values
RESULTS: Survey response rates ranged from 85-100%. Median ROL of matched candidates (2-3.5) did not differ between programs (p=0.09) and the lowest matched ROL for any year was 10-12. Interview numbers did not affect the final candidate ROL (p=0.22). While PDs thought the minimum median interview number should be 20, the number actually conducted was significantly higher (p\u3c0.001).
CONCLUSION: These data suggest that PSTPs interview excessive numbers of candidates. Programs and applicants should evaluate mechanisms to reduce interviews to limit costs and effort associated with the match