Termination efficiency of the UAA, UGA and UAG ‘abundant’ and ‘rare’ termination signals in

<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Comparison of characteristics and function of translation termination signals between and within prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms"</p><p>Nucleic Acids Research 2006;34(7):1959-1973.</p><p>Published online 13 Apr 2006</p><p>PMCID:PMC1435984.</p><p>© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved</p> Termination efficiency was derived from the 3A′ protein synthesis termination assay (). Readthrough (%) was calculated by comparison of readthrough protein (3A′) to total protein (3A′ + 2A′). Constructs were assayed in specific strains of XAc wild-type strain (dark grey), XA105 UAA suppressor strain (light grey), CDJ64 UGA suppressor strain (light grey) and XA101 UAG suppressor strain (light grey). The mean values from six experiments are presented. Error bars are ±SEM

Termination efficiency of the eukaryotic UAA, UGA and UAG ‘abundant’ and ‘rare’ termination signals and

<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Comparison of characteristics and function of translation termination signals between and within prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms"</p><p>Nucleic Acids Research 2006;34(7):1959-1973.</p><p>Published online 13 Apr 2006</p><p>PMCID:PMC1435984.</p><p>© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved</p> Termination efficiency was derived from a dual luciferase protein synthesis termination assay (–) and using COS-7 cells (–). Readthrough (%) was calculated by comparison to a control construct (UGG). The mean values from three experiments are presented. Error bars are ±SEM