8 research outputs found
Recanalisation artérielle périphérique. Etude des perméabilités cumulées et des facteurs influençant les résultats à partir d'une série de 118 recanalisations iliaques ou fémoropolitées
REIMS-BU Santé (514542104) / SudocPARIS-BIUM (751062103) / SudocSudocFranceF
Vascular e-Learning in the MENA Region during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Introduction: With the steady rise in interest in e-learning and the sudden boost provoked by the COVID-19 pandemic, it becomes necessary to explore the e-learning experience within the medical community in the MENA region. Methods: An online survey was conducted during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic (June 15 – October 15, 2020). Results: Seventy-eight vascular surgeons and trainees from 16 countries participated. 88% of the participants were male. 55% attended more than 4 activities. More than half of the activities did not lead to any official certification. Topic was the primary determinant for attending an activity. National societies and social media played a major role in disseminating activity-related information. Lack of time, increased workload, differences in time zone, and technical issues were the main obstacles cited. 84.7% of the participants had a positive impression. Conclusion: As the COVID-19 pandemic boosted e-learning activities in vascular surgery, a shift was observed in the learning mode and new leadership skills were called upon. Novel ways of quality control are required
Dataset of the vascular e-Learning during the COVID-19 pandemic (EL-COVID) survey
This dataset supports the findings of the vascular e-Learning during the COVID-19 pandemic survey (the EL-COVID survey). The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) of the European Union was taken into consideration in all steps of data handling. The survey was approved by the institutional ethics committee of the Primary Investigator and an online English survey consisting of 18 questions was developed ad-hoc. A bilingual English-Mandarin version of the questionnaire was developed according to the instructions of the Chinese Medical Association in order to be used in mainland People's Republic of China. Differences between the two questionnaires were minor and did affect the process of data collection. Both questionnaires were hosted online. The EL-COVID survey was advertised through major social media. All national and regional contributors contacted their respective colleagues through direct messaging on social media or by email. Eight national societies or groups supported the dissemination of the EL-COVID survey. The data provided demographics information of the EL-COVID participants and an insight on the level of difficulty in accessing or citing previously attended online activities and whether participants were keen on citing these activities in their Curricula Vitae. A categorization of additional comments made by the participants are also based on the data. The survey responses were filtered, anonymized and submitted to descriptive analysis of percentage
The "Woundosome" Concept and Its Impact on Procedural Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia
This editorial assembles endovascular specialists from diverse clinical backgrounds and nationalities with a global call to address key challenges to enhance revascularization in chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) patients.- Dedicated below-the-ankle (BTA) angiography and revascularization is underutilized in ischemic foot treatment. Existing guidelines do not address comprehensive BTA vessel analysis. CLTI trials also often lack data on in-line arterial flow to the ischemic lesion and BTA vessel evaluation, hindering outcome assessment.- Dedicated multi-planar angiographic evaluation of the distal microcirculation is key: Direct arterial flow or good-quality collaterals are crucial in influencing wound healing and need to be assessed diligently to the level of the distal ischemic wound territory, termed “woundosome.”- An important primary emphasis of future trials should be on validating technologies and strategies for assessing tissue perfusion before, during, and after revascularization undertaken to heal tissue loss in CLTI patients. This will allow determination of a potentially significant delta in tissue perfusion prior to and following intervention at the “woundosome” level. Once changes in arterial perfusion have been identified as positively correlated to wound healing, these could serve as a much-needed novel primary technical outcome measure for patients with tissue loss undergoing surgical, hybrid, or endovascular revascularization
Vascular e-Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The EL-COVID Survey
Background: The corona virus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has radically changed the possibilities for vascular surgeons and trainees to exchange knowledge and experience. The aim of the present survey is to inventorize the e-learning needs of vascular surgeons and trainees as well as the strengths and weaknesses of vascular e-Learning. Methods: An online survey consisting of 18 questions was created in English, with a separate bilingual English-Mandarin version. The survey was dispersed to vascular surgeons and trainees worldwide through social media and via direct messaging from June 15, 2020 to October 15, 2020. Results: Eight hundred and fifty-six records from 84 different countries could be included. Most participants attended several online activities (>4: n = 461, 54%; 2–4: n = 300, 35%; 1: n = 95, 11%) and evaluated online activities as positive or very positive (84.7%). In deciding upon participation, the topic of the activity was most important (n = 440, 51.4%), followed by the reputation of the presenter or the panel (n = 178, 20.8%), but not necessarily receiving accreditation or certification (n = 52, 6.1%). The survey identified several shortcomings in vascular e-Learning during the pandemic: limited possibility to attend due to lack of time and increased workload (n = 432, 50.5%), no protected/allocated time (n = 488, 57%) and no accreditation or certification, while technical shortcomings were only a minor problem (n = 25, 2.9%). Conclusions: During the COVID-19 pandemic vascular e-Learning has been used frequently and was appreciated by vascular professionals from around the globe. The survey identified strengths and weaknesses in current e-Learning that can be used to further improve online learning in vascular surgery
Dataset of the vascular e-Learning during the COVID-19 pandemic (EL-COVID) survey
This dataset supports the findings of the vascular e-Learning during the
COVID-19 pandemic survey (the EL-COVID survey). The General Data
Protection Regulation (GDPR) of the European Union was taken into
consideration in all steps of data handling. The survey was approved by
the institutional ethics committee of the Primary Investigator and an
online English survey consisting of 18 questions was developed ad-hoc. A
bilingual English-Mandarin version of the questionnaire was developed
according to the instructions of the Chinese Medical Association in
order to be used in mainland People's Republic of China. Differences
between the two questionnaires were minor and did affect the process of
data collection. Both questionnaires were hosted online.
The EL-COVID survey was advertised through major social media. All
national and regional contributors contacted their respective colleagues
through direct messaging on social media or by email. Eight national
societies or groups supported the dissemination of the EL-COVID survey.
The data provided demographics information of the EL-COVID participants
and an insight on the level of difficulty in accessing or citing
previously attended online activities and whether participants were keen
on citing these activities in their Curricula Vitae. A categorization of
additional comments made by the participants are also based on the data.
The survey responses were filtered, anonymized and submitted to
descriptive analysis of percentage. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc
Vascular e-Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The EL-COVID Survey
Background: The corona virus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has radically
changed the possibilities for vascular surgeons and trainees to exchange
knowledge and experience. The aim of the present survey is to
inventorize the e-learning needs of vascular surgeons and trainees as
well as the strengths and weaknesses of vascular e-Learning.
Methods: An online survey consisting of 18 questions was created in
English, with a separate bilingual English-Mandarin version. The survey
was dispersed to vascular surgeons and trainees worldwide through social
media and via direct messaging from June 15, 2020 to October 15, 2020.
Results: Eight hundred and fifty-six records from 84 different countries
could be included. Most participants attended several online activities
( >4: n = 461, 54%; 2-4: n = 300, 35%; 1: n = 95, 11%) and evaluated
online activities as positive or very positive (84.7%). In deciding
upon participation, the topic of the activity was most important (n =
440, 51.4%), followed by the reputation of the presenter or the panel
(n = 178, 20.8%), but not necessarily receiving accreditation or
certification (n = 52, 6.1%). The survey identified several
shortcomings in vascular e-Learning during the pandemic: limited
possibility to attend due to lack of time and increased workload (n =
432, 50.5%), no protected/allocated time (n = 488, 57%) and no
accreditation or certification, while technical shortcomings were only a
minor problem (n = 25, 2.9%).
Conclusions: During the COVID-19 pandemic vascular e-Learning has been
used frequently and was appreciated by vascular professionals from
around the globe. The survey identified strengths and weaknesses in
current e-Learning that can be used to further improve online learning
in vascular surgery