Comparative Hepatic and Intestinal Metabolism and Pharmacodynamics of Statins

The study aimed to comprehensively investigate the in vitro metabolism of statins. The metabolism of clinically relevant concentrations of atorvastatin, fluvastatin, pitavastatin, pravastatin, rosuvastatin, simvastatin, and their metabolites were investigated using human liver microsomes (HLMs), human intestine microsomes (HIMs), liver cytosol, and recombinant cytochrome P450 enzymes. We also determined the inhibitory effects of statin acids on their pharmacological target, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase. In HLMs, statin lactones were metabolized to a much higher extent than their acid forms. Atorvastatin lactone and simvastatin (lactone) showed extensive metabolism [intrinsic clearance (CLint) values of 3700 and 7400 mu l/min per milligram], whereas the metabolism of the lactones of 2-hydroxyatorvastatin, 4-hydroxyatorvastatin, and pitavastatin was slower (CLint 20-840 mu l/min per milligram). The acids had CLint values in the range SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The present comparison of the in vitro metabolic and pharmacodynamic properties of atorvastatin, fluvastatin, pitavastatin, pravastatin, rosuvastatin, and simvastatin and their metabolites using unified methodology provides a strong basis for further application. Together with in vitro drug transporter and clinical data, the present findings are applicable for use in comparative systems pharmacology modeling to predict the pharmacokinetics and pharmacological effects of statins at different dosages.Peer reviewe

Real-world pharmacogenetics of statin intolerance : effects of SLCO1B1, ABCG2, and CYP2C9 variants

ObjectiveThe association of SLCO1B1 c.521T>C with simvastatin-induced muscle toxicity is well characterized. However, different statins are subject to metabolism and transport also by other proteins exhibiting clinically meaningful genetic variation. Our aim was to investigate associations of SLCO1B1 c.521T>C with intolerance to atorvastatin, fluvastatin, pravastatin, rosuvastatin, or simvastatin, those of ABCG2 c.421C>A with intolerance to atorvastatin, fluvastatin, or rosuvastatin, and that of CYP2C9*2 and *3 alleles with intolerance to fluvastatin. MethodsWe studied the associations of these variants with statin intolerance in 2042 patients initiating statin therapy by combining genetic data from samples from the Helsinki Biobank to clinical chemistry and statin purchase data. ResultsWe confirmed the association of SLCO1B1 c.521C/C genotype with simvastatin intolerance both by using phenotype of switching initial statin to another as a marker of statin intolerance [hazard ratio (HR) 1.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-3.25, P = 0.025] and statin switching along with creatine kinase measurement (HR 5.44, 95% CI 1.49-19.9, P = 0.011). No significant association was observed with atorvastatin and rosuvastatin. The sample sizes for fluvastatin and pravastatin were relatively small, but SLCO1B1 c.521T>C carriers had an increased risk of pravastatin intolerance defined by statin switching when compared to homozygous reference T/T genotype (HR 2.11, 95% CI 1.01-4.39, P = 0.047). ConclusionThe current results can inform pharmacogenetic statin prescribing guidelines and show feasibility for the methodology to be used in larger future studies.Peer reviewe