5 research outputs found

    Retrospective Observational Study of Outcomes in HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer (mBC) Patients Treated with Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine (T-DM1) and Subsequent Treatments After T-DM1 in the United States

    No full text
    Abstract Background Limited evidence exists on real-world outcomes with ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) treatment and the effectiveness of subsequent therapies. Objective This study evaluated treatment patterns and outcomes of patients treated with T-DM1 and post-T-DM1 therapy in the United States. Patients and methods Adult patients with HER2-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) initiating treatment with T-DM1 between 1/1/2013 and 9/30/2018 were included and followed through 12/31/2018. Data were obtained from the iKnowMed electronic health record. Demographic, clinical, and pre- and post-T-DM1 treatment characteristics were described. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) and overall survival (OS). Results Of 318 patients treated with T-DM1, 184 (57.9%) had prior treatment with pertuzumab. The median age was 58 years. Most patients had visceral disease (93.4%), and 62.3% had two or more prior treatments for mBC before T-DM1 (range 0–9). The most common subsequent regimens were trastuzumab + vinorelbine (22.5%), HER2-targeted monotherapy (22.5%), and trastuzumab + other chemotherapy (19.6%). Median TTD with T-DM1 was 5.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.6–6.9); median OS from the start of T-DM1 therapy was 19.2 months (95% CI 16.8–24.5). Conclusions Patients treated with T-DM1 in this study appeared to have more advanced disease than patients in clinical trials and were treated in later lines of therapy. Variability was observed across subsequent therapy selections. Treatment patterns and outcomes appeared comparable for patients who received prior pertuzumab. The short treatment durations and survival with T-DM1 therapy in the real-world setting underscore the need for effective post-trastuzumab therapies

    Real-World Treatment Patterns and Economic Burden Following First-Line Trastuzumab in Patients with Metastatic Gastric Cancer in the USA

    No full text
    Abstract Background Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy is the standard first-line (1L) treatment for HER2+ metastatic gastric cancer (mGC) in the USA. Objective This study characterizes the real-world treatment patterns, healthcare resource use (HRU), and costs in patients with HER2+ mGC post-1L trastuzumab before approval of fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki. Patients and methods This retrospective study used the IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus Database (October 2014–September 2019) to identify adults with HER2+ mGC who discontinued trastuzumab-based regimens in 1L. Patient characteristics, second-line (2L) treatment patterns, and treatment duration were summarized. HRU and costs before and after discontinuation of 1L trastuzumab-based regimens as well as during 2L treatment were described. Results Of the 190 HER2+mGC patients who discontinued 1L trastuzumab-based regimens, 136 (71.58%) initiated 2L treatments. Trastuzumab-based regimens were the most common in 2L (50.74%), followed by ramucirumab + paclitaxel (19.85%). The median time to 2L discontinuation was 2.37 months. During a mean follow-up of 9.8 months, mean per-patient-per-month (PPPM) healthcare costs post-1L trastuzumab-based regimens were higher in patients receiving 2L treatment than those without subsequent treatment (US25,178vs.US25,178 vs. US14,812). The mean PPPM cost during 2L treatment was US30,838,primarilydrivenbyoutpatientinfusioncosts(US30,838, primarily driven by outpatient infusion costs (US22,262). Conclusions The short duration of 2L treatment observed in this study is consistent with a lack of effective treatments post-1L trastuzumab prior to 2020. Re-use of trastuzumab treatment was common despite its limited efficacy and high treatment cost. The findings highlight the unmet medical needs and substantial burden faced by patients with HER2 +mGC previously treated with trastuzumab

    Characteristics affecting oral anticoagulant therapy choice among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a retrospective claims analysis

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Dabigatran is one of the three newer oral anticoagulants (OACs) recently approved in the United States for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients. The objective of this study was to identify patient, healthcare provider, and health plan factors associated with dabigatran versus warfarin use among NVAF patients. METHODS: Administrative claims data from patients with ≥2 NVAF medical claims in the HealthCore Integrated Research Database between 10/1/2009 and 10/31/2011 were analyzed. During the study intake period (10/1/2010 - 10/31/2011), dabigatran patients had ≥2 dabigatran prescriptions, warfarin patients had ≥2 warfarin and no dabigatran prescriptions, and the first oral anticoagulant (OAC) prescription date was the index date. Continuous enrollment for 12 months preceding (“pre-index”) and ≥ 6 months following the index date was required. Patients without pre-index warfarin use were assigned to the ‘OAC-naïve’ subgroup. Separate analyses were performed for ‘all-patient’ and ‘OAC-naïve’ cohorts. Multivariable logistic regression (LR) identified factors associated with dabigatran versus warfarin use. RESULTS: Of 20,320 patients (3,019 dabigatran and 17,301 warfarin) who met study criteria, 27% of dabigatran and 13% of warfarin patients were OAC-naïve. Among all-patients, dabigatran patients were younger (mean 67 versus 73 years, p < 0.001), predominantly male (71% versus 61%, p < 0.001), and more frequently had a cardiologist prescriber (51% versus 30%, p < 0.001) than warfarin patients. Warfarin patients had higher pre-index Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (mean: 4.3 versus 4.0, p < 0.001) and higher ATRIA bleeding risk score (mean: 3.0 versus 2.3, p < 0.001). LR results were generally consistent between all- and OAC-naïve patients. Among OAC-naïve patients, strongest factors associated with dabigatran use were prescriber specialty (OR = 3.59, 95% CI 2.68-4.81 for cardiologist; OR = 2.22, 95% CI 1.65-2.97 for other specialist), health plan type (OR = 1.47 95% CI 1.10-1.96 for preferred provider organization), and prior ischemic stroke (OR = 1.42, 95% CI 1.06-1.90). Older age decreased the probability of dabigatran use. CONCLUSIONS: Beside patient characteristics, cardiology specialty of the prescribing physician and health plan type were the strongest factors associated with dabigatran use
    corecore