Comparative environmental footprints of lettuce supplied by hydroponic controlled-environment agriculture and field-based supply chains

Attributional life cycle assessment was applied to determine environmental footprints of lettuce produced across  ten supply chain configurations, based on either hydroponic closed-environment agriculture (CEA) with six  different electricity sources, or field supply chains involving regional, continental or inter-continental transport.  Hydroponic CEA systems use circa 15 kWh of electricity for lighting, cooling, ventilation and pumping per kg of  lettuce supplied. Based on typical current national grid electricity generation mixes with significant fossil fuel  dependence, this results in large environmental footprints, e.g. up to 17.8 kg CO2 eq. and 33 g N eq. per kg lettuce  – compared with 10 kg CO2 eq. and 16 g N eq. per kg lettuce air-freighted across continents. However, hydro?ponic CEA can produce orders of magnitude more produce per m2 .yr and can be integrated into existing buildings  (e.g. on roof tops, in basements and disused warehouses, etc). Factoring in the carbon opportunity costs of land  use, and meeting electricity requirements exclusively through renewable generation, could result in closed hy?droponic CEA delivering produce with a smaller carbon footprint than most field-based supply chains, at 0.48 kg  CO2 eq. per kg lettuce. However, this would only be the case where renewable electricity originates from  genuinely additional capacity, and where a land use policy or other mechanisms ensure that modest areas of land  spared from horticultural production are used for “nature based solutions” such as afforestation. Hydroponic CEA  uses orders of magnitude less direct water than field-based systems, and could help to mitigate water stress and  associated soil degradation in arid and semi-arid regions used for horticulture – so long as upstream water stress  associated with electricity generation is mitigated. CEA could be one of the least sustainable forms of food  production if poorly implemented, and has numerous environmental hotspots. But with careful design and  scaling, in appropriate contexts of high demand and low agro-climatic potential for production of horticultural  produce, CEA deployment could play a role in sustainable food system transformation, potentially helping to  reconnect consumers with (urban) producers. There may be opportunities to link building air handling systems  with rooftop or basement CEA requiring inputs of cooling, CO2 and water.  </p

Metal-organic frameworks as regeneration optimized sorbents for atmospheric water harvesting

As the freshwater crisis looms, metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) with stepped isotherms lie at the forefront of desiccant development for atmospheric water harvesting (AWH). Despite numerous studies on water sorption kinetics in MOF desiccants, the kinetics of AWH sorbents  are a challenge to quantify. Here, we report that the AWH kinetics of  seven known MOFs and the industry-standard desiccant Syloid are limited  by diffusion  to the sorbent bed surface. A quantitative model that exploits isotherm  shape enables simulation of sorption cycling to evaluate sorbent  performance through productivity contour plots  (“heatmaps”). These heatmaps reveal two key findings: steady-state  oscillation around partial loading optimizes productivity, and dense  ultramicroporous MOFs with a step at low relative humidity afford superior volumetric  performance under practically relevant temperature swing conditions  (27°C, 30% relative humidity [RH] − 60°C, 5.4% RH). Cellulose-desiccant  composites of two such regeneration optimized sorbents retain the  kinetics of powders, producing up to 7.3 L/kg/day of water under these  conditions.</p