801 research outputs found

    Scalability Evaluation of a Polymorphic Register File: A CG Case Study

    Full text link

    GRAPHS ANU COMPILER OPTIMIZATION*

    Get PDF

    The Impact of Cryoballoon Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation on Healthcare Utilization and Costs: An Economic Analysis From the FIRE AND ICE Trial

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: This study sought to assess payer costs following cryoballoon or radiofrequency current (RFC) catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in the randomized FIRE AND ICE trial. METHODS AND RESULTS: A trial period analysis of healthcare costs evaluated the impact of ablation modality (cryoballoon versus RFC) on differences in resource use and associated payer costs. Analyses were based on repeat interventions, rehospitalizations, and cardioversions during the trial, with unit costs based on 3 national healthcare systems (Germany [euro], the United Kingdom [ pound], and the United States []).Totalpayercostswerecalculatedbyapplyingstandardunitcoststohospitalstays,usingInternationalClassificationofDiseases,10thRevisiondiagnosesandprocedurecodesthatweremappedtocountryspecificdiagnosisrelatedgroups.Patients(N=750)randomized1:1tocryoballoon(n=374)orRFC(n=376)ablationwerefollowedforameanof1.5years.ResourceusewaslowerinthecryoballoonthantheRFCgroup(205hospitalizationsand/orinterventionsin122patientsversus268eventsin154patients).Thecostdifferencesperpatientinmeantotalpayercostsduringfollowupwereeuro640,pound364,and]). Total payer costs were calculated by applying standard unit costs to hospital stays, using International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision diagnoses and procedure codes that were mapped to country-specific diagnosis-related groups. Patients (N=750) randomized 1:1 to cryoballoon (n=374) or RFC (n=376) ablation were followed for a mean of 1.5 years. Resource use was lower in the cryoballoon than the RFC group (205 hospitalizations and/or interventions in 122 patients versus 268 events in 154 patients). The cost differences per patient in mean total payer costs during follow-up were euro640, pound364, and 925 in favor of cryoballoon ablation (P=0.012, 0.013, and 0.016, respectively). This resulted in trial period total cost savings of euro245 000, pound140 000, and $355 000. CONCLUSIONS: When compared with RFC ablation, cryoballoon ablation was associated with a reduction in resource use and payer costs. In all 3 national healthcare systems analyzed, this reduction resulted in substantial trial period cost savings, primarily attributable to fewer repeat ablations and a reduction in cardiovascular rehospitalizations with cryoballoon ablation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Identifier: NCT01490814

    Crystal structures of self-assembled nanotubes from flexible macrocycles by weak interactions

    Get PDF
    8 páginas, 7 figuras, 2 tablas, 2 esquemas.Herein we report the crystal structures of tubular self-assemblies of flexible macrooligolides. The assembly is driven by the propensity of the macrocycles to create nearly flat structures displaying a void space within them and the cooperativity of weak directional interactions such as dipole–dipole interactions and CH***Ohydrogen bonds and non-directional interactions such as van der Waals contacts. The significance of the stereochemistry and the size of the cavity in the formation of the nanotubes are also studied.This research was supported by the Spanish MICINN-FEDER (CTQ2008-03334/BQU, CTQ2008-06806-C02-01/BQU and CTQ2008-06754-C04-01/PPQ), the MSC (RTICC RD06/0020/ 1046) and the Canary Islands FUNCIS (PI 01/06).Peer reviewe

    Five-year outcome in 18 010 patients from the German Aortic Valve Registry

    Get PDF
    OBJECTIVES: To determine the 5-year outcome in patients treated by isolated transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) or surgical aortic valve replacement (sAVR)—a prospective observational cohort study. METHODS: A total of 18 010 patients were included (n = 8942 TAVI and n = 9068 sAVR) in the German Aortic Valve Registry (GARY) who were treated in 2011 and 2012 at 92 sites in central Germany. Eligible patients with TAVI and sAVR were matched using propensity scores in a nearest-neighbour approach. Patients with repeat procedures or unequivocal indication for one treatment option (e.g. frailty) were excluded (n = 4785 for TAVI and n = 2 for sAVR). This led to 13 223 patients (4157 TAVI and 9066 sAVR) as an unmatched subcohort. The main outcome measure was the 5-year all-cause mortality. RESULTS: TAVI patients were significantly older (80.9 ± 6.1 vs 68.5 ± 11.1 years, P < 0.001), had a higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score (6.3 ± 4.9 vs 2.6 ± 3.0, P < 0.001) and a higher 5-year all-cause mortality (49.8% vs 16.5%, P < 0.0001). There was no major difference in in-hospital stroke, in-hospital myocardial infarction, or temporary and chronic dialysis. In the propensity score-matched group (n = 3640), there were 763 deaths (41.9%) among 1820 TAVI patients compared with 552 (30.3%) among 1820 treated with sAVR during the 5-year follow-up (hazard ratio 1.51, 95% confidence interval 1.35–1.68; P < 0.0001). New pacemaker implantation was performed in 448 patients (24.6%) after TAVI and in 201 (11.0%) after sAVR (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The 5-year follow-up data show that TAVI patients were significantly older and had a higher STS score than sAVR patients. After propensity score matching, TAVI with early-generation prosthesis was associated with significantly higher 5-year all-cause mortality than sAVR
    corecore