Heart Disease in Patients with HIV/AIDS-An Emerging Clinical Problem

HIV/AIDS (Human immunodeficiency virus/ Acquired immuno deficiency syndrome) is a growing global problem, in terms of its incidence and mortality. Patients with HIV/AIDS are living much longer with HAART (Highly active antiretroviral therapy) therapy so much so that HIV/AIDS has now become a part of the chronic disease burden, like hypertension and diabetes. Patients with HIV/AIDS and symptoms suggestive of cardiac disease represent a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge in clinical practice; Cardiologists are more frequently encountering this problem. An algorithmic, anatomic approach to diagnosis, localizing disease to the endocardium, myocardium and pericardium can be useful. An intimate knowledge of opportunistic infections affecting the heart, effects of HAART therapy and therapy for opportunistic infections on the heart is needed to be able to formulate a differential diagnosis. Effects of HAART therapy, especially protease inhibitors on lipid and glucose metabolism, and their influence on progression to premature vascular disease require consideration. Treatment of cardiac disease, in HIV/AIDS patients can vary from non-HIV patients, based on drug interactions, differences in responsiveness, and other factors; and this area requires further research

Omecamtiv mecarbil in chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, GALACTIC‐HF: baseline characteristics and comparison with contemporary clinical trials

Aims: The safety and efficacy of the novel selective cardiac myosin activator, omecamtiv mecarbil, in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is tested in the Global Approach to Lowering Adverse Cardiac outcomes Through Improving Contractility in Heart Failure (GALACTIC‐HF) trial. Here we describe the baseline characteristics of participants in GALACTIC‐HF and how these compare with other contemporary trials. Methods and Results: Adults with established HFrEF, New York Heart Association functional class (NYHA) ≥ II, EF ≤35%, elevated natriuretic peptides and either current hospitalization for HF or history of hospitalization/ emergency department visit for HF within a year were randomized to either placebo or omecamtiv mecarbil (pharmacokinetic‐guided dosing: 25, 37.5 or 50 mg bid). 8256 patients [male (79%), non‐white (22%), mean age 65 years] were enrolled with a mean EF 27%, ischemic etiology in 54%, NYHA II 53% and III/IV 47%, and median NT‐proBNP 1971 pg/mL. HF therapies at baseline were among the most effectively employed in contemporary HF trials. GALACTIC‐HF randomized patients representative of recent HF registries and trials with substantial numbers of patients also having characteristics understudied in previous trials including more from North America (n = 1386), enrolled as inpatients (n = 2084), systolic blood pressure < 100 mmHg (n = 1127), estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (n = 528), and treated with sacubitril‐valsartan at baseline (n = 1594). Conclusions: GALACTIC‐HF enrolled a well‐treated, high‐risk population from both inpatient and outpatient settings, which will provide a definitive evaluation of the efficacy and safety of this novel therapy, as well as informing its potential future implementation

The impact of COVID-19 infection on heart transplant function

Abstract Background Heart transplant recipients are a subset of immunocompromised patients at particularly high risk of morbidity and mortality from COVID-19. Acute effects of the viral infection have been well-described in the literature but the chronic effects persisting after recovery from infection have not. The aim of this study is to determine the impact of COVID-19 on heart transplant function both during and after recovery from acute infection. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the data of 32 heart transplant recipients at the University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB). Echocardiograms of patients with documented COVID-19 infection were analyzed at three time points including pre-infection, peri-infection, and post-infection. Echocardiograms of patients without history of infection were analyzed as control. Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) and presence or absence of valvular insufficiency were collected from echocardiograms to assess systolic and valvular function. Results 2 out of 10 COVID-19 positive heart transplant recipients had decreases in LVEF below 20% during the peri-infection period, and one of these patients passed away from complications of infection. Despite this, mean LVEF was not significantly different at peri-infection (p = .3, 95% CI − 11.5 to 27.6) or post-infection  (p = .6, 95% CI − 3.6 to 5.8) time points when compared to pre-infection. A statistically significant increase in valvular dysfunction was found among COVID-19 positive patients without documented history of valvular dysfunction on pre-infection echocardiograms (p = .01, 95% CI 19.3% to 96.4%). COVID-19 negative heart transplant recipients did not experience statistically significant changes in LVEF 1, 2, or 3 years after baseline echocardiogram. Conclusion COVID-19 may induce myocardial dysfunction resulting in decreased systolic function and valvular dysfunction among heart transplant recipients. Severity of systolic dysfunction may be a useful prognostic indicator among this patient population. More research must be conducted to fully elucidate the effects of COVID-19 infection on heart transplant recipients

Emerging concepts in heart failure management and treatment: focus on point-of-care ultrasound in cardiogenic shock

Abstract: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) plays a strategic role in the diagnostic and therapeutic evaluation of critically ill patients and, especially, in those who are haemodynamically unstable. In this context, POCUS allows a more precise identification of the cause, its differential diagnosis, the eventual coexistence with another entity and, finally, guiding of the therapeutic approach. It implies a portable use of ultrasound in acute settings covering different specified protocols, such as echocardiography, vascular, lung or abdominal ultrasound. This article reviews POCUS application in the emergency department or the intensive care unit, focused on severely compromised patients with cardiogenic shock with an emergent bedside assessment. Considering the high mortality rate of this entity, POCUS provides the intensivist/clinician with an appropriate tool for accurate diagnoses and a timely management plan. The authors propose practical algorithms for the diagnosis of patients using POCUS in these settings

Cardiovascular Disease Burden and Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Young Black Patients: A National Analysis of 2 Cohorts 10 Years Apart (2017 Versus 2007)

Background We aim to compare the burden of cardiovascular disease risk factors and major adverse cardiac events and in‐hospital outcomes among young Black patients (aged 18–44 years) hospitalized in 2007 and 2017 using data obtained from the National Inpatient Sample database. Method and Results Comparison of the sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, and inpatient outcomes, including major adverse cardiac events (all‐cause mortality, acute myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, ventricular fibrillation/flutter, pulmonary embolism, and coronary intervention), between 2017 and 2007 was performed. Multivariable analyses were performed, controlling for potential covariates. A total of 2 922 743 (mean age, 31 years; 70.3% women) admissions among young Black individuals were studied (1 341 068 in 2007 and 1 581 675 in 2017). The 2017 cohort had a younger population (mean, 30 versus 31 years; P<0.001), more male patients (30.4% versus 28.8%; P<0.001), and patients with higher nonelective admissions (76.8% versus 75%; P<0.001), and showed an increasing burden of traditional cardiometabolic comorbidities, congestive heart failure, chronic pulmonary disease, coagulopathy, depression, along with notable reductions in alcohol abuse and drug abuse, compared with the 2007 cohort. The adjusted multivariable analysis showed worsening in‐hospital outcomes, including major adverse cardiac events (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.21), acute myocardial infarction (aOR, 1.34), cardiogenic shock (aOR, 3.12), atrial fibrillation/flutter (aOR, 1.34), ventricular fibrillation/flutter (aOR, 1.32), cardiac arrest (aOR, 2.55), pulmonary embolism (aOR, 1.89), and stroke (aOR, 1.53). The 2017 cohort showed a decreased rate of percutaneous coronary intervention/coronary artery bypass grafting and all‐cause mortality versus the 2007 cohort (P<0.001). Conclusions In conclusion, young Black patients have had an increasing burden of cardiovascular disease risk factors and worsened in‐hospital outcomes, including major adverse cardiac events and stroke, in the past decade, although with improved survival odds

Healthcare and economic burden of heart failure with amyloidosis: An insight from National Readmission Database

Introduction:We analyzed trends, causes and predictors of 30-days readmission in cardiac amyloidosis and inspected the impact of these readmissions on mortality, morbidity, and utilization of healthcare resources. Methods:Heart Failure with cardiac amyloidosis patients were selected from National readmission Database (NRD) using ICD-10 CM codes. Patients younger than 18 years, elective readmissions, readmissions due to trauma, patients with missing data and December 2018 admissions were excluded. Primary outcome was all-cause 30-day readmissions rate, secondary outcomes were factors associated with 30-days readmissions and their effect on morbidity, mortality, and healthcare resource utilization. Results:Out of 4123 total heart failure with cardiac amyloidosis index admissions in 2018, 3374 patients were included in final analysis. 19.6% were readmitted within 30 days. Readmitted patients were younger, sicker, admitted to small or large hospital. Hypertensive heart and Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD Stage I-IV) with Congestive Heart Failure (CHF), hypertensive heart and CKD (Stage V) or End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) with CHF, hypertensive heart disease with CHF, acute kidney failure, and sepsis were the most common causes of readmissions. Young age, admission to small and large size hospitals were independent predictors of 30-day readmissions. Readmissions had higher mortality, costed 6.6 extra in hospital days to patients and $16380 per admission to healthcare system. Conclusions:Cardiac amyloidosis readmissions were associated with increased morbidity and mortality of patients and extra burden on the healthcare system. There is a need to identify patients at risk for readmissions to improve patient outcomes and decrease healthcare cost