8 research outputs found

    Appendix A. A table showing litter disappearance exponential rate constants for sugar maple and red oak litter samples in two exotic earthworm invasion fronts at Arnot Forest (central New York).

    No full text
    A table showing litter disappearance exponential rate constants for sugar maple and red oak litter samples in two exotic earthworm invasion fronts at Arnot Forest (central New York)

    Appendix B. An ANOVA table comparing the total density and biomass of exotic earthworms samples beneath litter boxes with sugar maple or oak litter in two earthworm-invaded plots in a hardwood forest in central New York.

    No full text
    An ANOVA table comparing the total density and biomass of exotic earthworms samples beneath litter boxes with sugar maple or oak litter in two earthworm-invaded plots in a hardwood forest in central New York

    Supplement 1. All data sets analyzed in this article.

    No full text
    <h2>File List</h2><blockquote> <p><a href="Data.txt">Data.txt</a></p> </blockquote><h2>Description</h2><blockquote> <p>The data.txt file is a tab-delimited ascii file. It contains all response variables presented in this article. The first row contains the capitalized variable names used in column definitions below.</p> <p>Column definitions:</p> <p>1. PLOT – An integer to identify the 32 experimental plots</p> <p>2. N – A value of 1 (one) identifies an N addition plot. A value of 0 (zero) identifies a plot that did not receive added N.</p> <p>3. P – A value of 1 (one) identifies a P addition plot. A value of 0 (zero) identifies a plot that did not receive added P.</p> <p>4. K – A value of 1 (one) identifies a K addition plot. A value of 0 (zero) identifies a plot that did not receive added K.</p> <p>5. BLOCK – An integer to identify the two blocks within each replicate. In the balanced, incomplete blocks design, one block in each replicate includes the treatments +N, +P, +K and +NPK and the      second block in each replicate includes the treatments CONTROL, +NP, +NK and +PK. Values are 0 (zero) or 1 (one).</p> <p>6. REP - An integer to identify the four replicates of the factorial NPK experiment.</p> <p>7. RGR14_25 – The relative growth rate between 1997 and 2000 for saplings with DBH between 10 and 24 mm DBH in 1997.</p> <p>8. RGR46_25 – The relative growth rate between 2000 and 2008 for saplings with DBH between 10 and 24 mm DBH in 2000.</p> <p>9. RGR14_50  – The relative growth rate between 1997 and 2000 for saplings with DBH between 25 and 49 mm DBH in 1997.</p> <p>10. RGR46_50 – The relative growth rate between 2000 and 2008 for saplings with DBH between 25 and 49 mm DBH in 2000.</p> <p>11. RGR14_100 – The relative growth rate between 1997 and 2000 for saplings with DBH between 50 and 99 mm DBH in 1997.</p> <p>12. RGR46_100 – The relative growth rate between 2000 and 2008 for saplings with DBH between 50 and 99 mm DBH in 2000.</p> <p>13. RGR14_CAN – The relative growth rate between 1997 and 2000 for saplings with DBH greater than 99 mm DBH in 1997.</p> <p>14. RGR46_CAN – The relative growth rate between 2000 and 2008 for saplings with DBH greater than 99 mm DBH in 2000.</p> <p>15. ANPP9800 – Above-ground net primary production between 1998 and 2000. ANPP is the sum of wood and fine litter production. Units are Mg ha<sup>-1</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup>. </p> <p>16. ANPP0008 – Above-ground net primary production between 2000 and 2008. ANPP is the sum of wood and fine litter production. Units are Mg ha<sup>-1</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup>. </p> <p>17. F2000_5CM – Fine root biomass between 0 and 5 cm depth in April 2000. Fine roots are < 2 mm in diameter. Units are kg m<sup>-3</sup>.</p> <p>18. C2000_5CM – Coarse root biomass between 0 and 5 cm depth in April 2000. Coarse root diameters are between 2 and 5 mm. Units are kg m<sup>-3</sup>. These data were not analyzed due to the large numbers of zeros, but are included here to facilitate comparison with other studies.</p> <p>19. F2008_5CM – Fine root biomass between 0 and 5 cm depth in November 2008. Fine roots are < 2 mm in diameter. Units are kg m<sup>-3</sup>.</p> <p>20. C2008_5CM – Coarse root biomass between 0 and 5 cm depth in November 2008. Coarse root diameters are between 2 and 5 mm. Units are kg m<sup>-3</sup>. These data were not analyzed due to the large numbers of zeros, but are included here to facilitate comparison with other studies.</p> <p>21. F2009_5CM – Fine root biomass between 0 and 5 cm depth in April 2009. Fine roots are < 2 mm in diameter. Units are kg m<sup>-3</sup>.</p> <p>22. C2009_5CM – Coarse root biomass between 0 and 5 cm depth in April 2009. Coarse root diameters are between 2 and 5 mm. Units are kg m<sup>-3</sup>. These data were not analyzed due to the large numbers of zeros, but are included here to facilitate comparison with other studies.</p> <p>23. F2000_10CM – Fine root biomass between 5 and 10 cm depth in April 2000. Fine roots are < 2 mm in diameter. Units are kg m<sup>-3</sup>.</p> <p>24. C2000_10CM – Coarse root biomass between 5 and 10 cm depth in April 2000. Coarse root diameters are between 2 and 5 mm. Units are kg m<sup>-3</sup>. These data were not analyzed due to the large numbers of zeros, but are included here to facilitate comparison with other studies.</p> <p>25. F2008_10CM – Fine root biomass between 5 and 10 cm depth in November 2008. Fine roots are < 2 mm in diameter. Units are kg m<sup>-3</sup>.</p> <p>26. C2008_10CM – Coarse root biomass between 5 and 10 cm depth in November 2008. Coarse root diameters are between 2 and 5 mm. Units are kg m<sup>-3</sup>. These data were not analyzed due to the large numbers of zeros, but are included here to facilitate comparison with other studies.</p> <p>27. F2009_10CM – Fine root biomass between 5 and 10 cm depth in April 2009. Fine roots are < 2 mm in diameter. Units are kg m<sup>-3</sup>.</p> <p>28. C2009_10CM – Coarse root biomass between 5 and 10 cm depth in April 2000. Coarse root diameters are between 2 and 5 mm. Units are kg m<sup>-3</sup>. These data were not analyzed due to the large numbers of zeros, but are included here to facilitate comparison with other studies.</p> <p>29. L_1998 – Leaf litter production in 1998. Units are Mg ha<sup>-1</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup>. </p> <p>30. F_1998 – Production of reproductive structures in 1998. Units are Mg ha<sup>-1</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup>. </p> <p>31. B_1998 – Small branch (< 2 cm in diameter) production in 1998. Units are Mg ha<sup>-1</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup>. </p> <p>32. D_1998 – Production of frass, dust and other small particles in 1998. Units are Mg ha<sup>-1</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup>.</p> <p>33. T_1998 – Total fine litter production in 1998. Units are Mg ha<sup>-1</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup>.</p> <p>34. L_1999 – Leaf litter production in 1999. Units are Mg ha<sup>-1</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup>. </p> <p>35. F_1999 – Production of reproductive structures in 1999. Units are Mg ha<sup>-1</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup>. </p> <p>36. B_1999 – Small branch (< 2 cm in diameter) production in 1999. Units are Mg ha<sup>-1</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup>. </p> <p>37. D_1999 – Production of frass, dust and other small particles in 1999. Units are Mg ha<sup>-1</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup>.</p> <p>38. T_1999 – Total fine litter production in 1999. Units are Mg ha<sup>-1</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup>.</p> <p>39. L_2000 – Leaf litter production in 2000. Units are Mg ha<sup>-1</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup>. </p> <p>40. F_2000 – Production of reproductive structures in 2000. Units are Mg ha<sup>-1</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup>. </p> <p>41. B_2000 – Small branch (< 2 cm in diameter) production in 2000. Units are Mg ha<sup>-1</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup>. </p> <p>42. D_2000 – Production of frass, dust and other small particles in 2000. Units are Mg ha<sup>-1</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup>.</p> <p>43. T_2000 – Total fine litter production in 2000. Units are Mg ha<sup>-1</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup>.</p> <p>44. L_2001 – Leaf litter production in 2001. Units are Mg ha<sup>-1</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup>. </p> <p>45. F_2001 – Production of reproductive structures in 2001. Units are Mg ha<sup>-1</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup>. </p> <p>46. B_2001 – Small branch (< 2 cm in diameter) production in 2001. Units are Mg ha<sup>-1</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup>. </p> <p>47. D_2001 – Production of frass, dust and other small particles in 2001. Units are Mg ha<sup>-1</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup>.</p> <p>48. T_2001 – Total fine litter production in 2001. Units are Mg ha<sup>-1</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup>.</p> <p>49. L_2002 – Leaf litter production in 2002. Units are Mg ha<sup>-1</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup>. </p> <p>50. F_2002 – Production of reproductive structures in 2002. Units are Mg ha<sup>-1</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup>. </p> <p>51. B_2002 – Small branch (< 2 cm in diameter) production in 2002. Units are Mg ha<sup>-1</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup>. </p> <p>52. D_2002 – Production of frass, dust and other small particles in 2002. Units are Mg ha<sup>-1</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup>.</p> <p>53. T_2002 – Total fine litter production in 2002. Units are Mg ha<sup>-1</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup>.</p> <p>54. L_2003 – Leaf litter production in 2003. Units are Mg ha<sup>-1</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup>. </p> <p>55. F_2003 – Production of reproductive structures in 2003. Units are Mg ha<sup>-1</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup>. </p> <p>56. B_2003 – Small branch (< 2 cm in diameter) production in 2003. Units are Mg ha<sup>-1</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup>. </p> <p>57. D_2003 – Production of frass, dust and other small particles in 2003. Units are Mg ha<sup>-1</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup>.</p> <p>58. T_2003 – Total fine litter production in 2003. Units are Mg ha<sup>-1</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup>.</p> <p>59. L_2004 – Leaf litter production in 2004. Units are Mg ha<sup>-1</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup>. </p> <p>60. F_2004 – Production of reproductive structures in 2004. Units are Mg ha<sup>-1</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup>. </p> </blockquote><p>...</p
    corecore