Harmonization: A Doctrine for the Next Decade

I share much of Professor Rahi\u27s assessment of the present situation and his desire for a resolution that will recognize the interdependence of the world\u27s economies and give to everyone the benefits of competition. The last forty years or so of experience in international antitrust instruct us, however, that there is no quick fix in this regard and, indeed, that we antitrust lawyers cannot impose any system, whether it be a Havana Charter or an unbridled national doctrine of extraterritoriality, on a world that is not economically or politically ready for it. We will just have to be patient and be grateful for modest gains for a while

Análise da qualidade de vida dos acadêmicos do curso de graduação em medicina da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, segundo escala de qualidade de vida Flanagan

Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Curso de Medicina. Departamento de Saúde Pública

The Need for a Thoughtful Assessment of the Application of U.S. Antitrust Law to International Transactions

It is commonly said that the United States antitrust laws are a cor- nerstone of our free enterprise system and our economic philosophy. It is another truism--one of more recent origin-that the most significant markets and arenas of competition today are the international ones. The daily business news bears out this conclusion. Yet one must also conclude that the relationship between these two indispensable features of our economic life-antitrust laws and international trade-is a troubled one which provides ample material for confusion, dispute and law review comment. Moreover, the debate over the application of United States antitrust law to international business transactions is in- herently an international, rather than domestic, discussion. Even if we Americans could agree that there were no points of controversy, we would have our foreign friends reminding us that indeed there are