Comparisons in Influence Conditions using In High and Low Suggestibility Groups.

<p>All <i>p</i> values were corrected using Tukey's multiple comparison test. Cohen's <i>dz</i> values >0.2 and <i>p</i> values <0.05 are indicated in bold text.</p

Reaction time during high (left) and low (right) probability trials during hard and easy influence.

<p>Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. An asterisk designates a significant difference.</p

Percentage of hard (high-effort) trials selected during high (left) and low (right) probability trials during each influence type.

<p>Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals.</p

Associations between BIS total score and (A) percentage of impulsive choices, and (B) change in k value, both under the ‘no influence’ condition.

<p>There were no slope differences between the ‘no influence’ condition and any influence conditions. Dotted lines represent the 95% confidence interval of the associations.</p

ANOVA Results of Percentage of Hard Choices and Reaction Time During Influence Conditions.

<p>Results of repeated-measures ANOVAs of percent hard choices (left) and reaction time (right).</p><p>ANOVA Results of Percentage of Hard Choices and Reaction Time During Influence Conditions.</p

Pairwise Comparisons of Percentage of Hard Choices During Influence Conditions.

<p>*Significance was detected across influence types using a repeated-measures ANOVA (<i>F</i> (2,46) = 9.67, <i>p</i> < 0.001, ηp² = 0.30). Significant <i>p</i> values are in bold. SD, standard deviation.</p><p>Pairwise Comparisons of Percentage of Hard Choices During Influence Conditions.</p

Association between increases in impulsive choices with impulsive influence and self-reported susceptibility to influence.

<p>Significant associations are indicated in bold text.</p

Associations between percentage of SS choices and (A) MISS total suggestibility score and (B) Peer Conformity Subscale score.

<p>Dotted lines represent the 95% confidence interval of the associations.</p

Comparisons in Influence Conditions in All Participants.

<p>All <i>p</i> values were corrected using Tukey's multiple comparison test. Cohen's <i>dz</i> values >0.2 and <i>p</i> values <0.05 are indicated in bold text.</p

Associations between reaction time differences (reaction time during hard minus easy influence) and influence score during low- and high-probability trials.

<p>Dotted lines represent the 95% confidence interval of the associations.</p