42 research outputs found

    Occurrence of Chloramphenicol-Resistance Genes as Environmental Pollutants from Swine Feedlots

    No full text
    Chloramphenicol-resistance genes could be propagated to the surrounding environment via agricultural application of swine waste. This study investigated the potential risks of chloramphenicol-resistance genes from swine feedlots and their surrounding environment. We applied a culture-independent method to investigate levels of chloramphenicol-resistance genes in the wastewater from swine feedlots and the correspondingly impacted agricultural fields in Beijing. The <i>cml</i>A, <i>flo</i>R, <i>fex</i>A, <i>cfr</i>, and <i>fex</i>B genes were present in all samples, with the highest absolute concentrations of 1.50 × 10<sup>6</sup> copies/g in soil and 6.69 × 10<sup>6</sup> copies/mL in wastewater. The concentration of chloramphenicol residue was determined by ultra performance liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS), with the highest concentrations of 0.83 ng/g in soil and 11.5 ng/mL in wastewater. Significant correlations were found between chloramphenicol-resistance genes and chloramphenicol residues (<i>r</i> = 0.79, <i>p</i> = 0.0008) as well as between chloramphenicol-resistance genes in swine feedlots and corresponding agricultural soils (<i>r</i> = 0.84, <i>p</i> = 0.02). Consequently, swine feedlot wastewater could become a source of chloramphenicol-resistance genes, which could then lead to the spread of antibiotic resistance and eventually pose a risk to public health. To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the occurrence of <i>flo</i>R, <i>fex</i>A, <i>cfr</i>, and <i>fex</i>B genes in the environment using a culture-independent method

    Simultaneous Detection of Forbidden Chemical Residues in Milk Using Dual-Label Time-Resolved Reverse Competitive Chemiluminescent Immunoassay Based on Amine Group Functionalized Surface

    No full text
    <div><p>In this study, a sensitive dual-label time-resolved reverse competitive chemiluminescent immunoassay was developed for simultaneous detection of chloramphenicol (CAP) and clenbuterol (CLE) in milk. The strategy was performed based on the distinction of the kinetic characteristics of horseradish peroxidase (HRP) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) in chemiluminesecence (CL) systems and different orders of magnitude in HRP CL value for CAP and ALP CL value for CLE in the chemiluminescent immunoassay. Capture antibodies were covalently bound to the amine group functionalized chemiluminescent microtiter plate (MTP) for efficient binding of detection antibodies for the enzymes labeled CAP (HRP-CAP) and CLE (ALP-CLE). The CL signals were recorded at different time points by the automatic luminometers with significant distinction in the dynamic curves. When we considered the ALP CL value (about 10<sup>5</sup>) of CLE as background for HRP CL signal value (about 10<sup>7</sup>) of CAP, there was no interaction from ALP CL background of CLE and the differentiation of CAP and CLE can be easily achieved. The 50% inhibition concentration (IC<sub>50</sub>) values of CAP and CLE in milk samples were 0.00501 µg L<sup>−1</sup> and 0.0128 µg L<sup>−1</sup>, with the ranges from 0.0003 µg L<sup>−1</sup> to 0.0912 µg L<sup>−1</sup> and from 0.00385 µg L<sup>−1</sup> to 0.125 µg L<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. The developed method is more sensitive and of less duration than the commercial ELISA kits, suitable for simultaneous screening of CAP and CLE.</p></div

    Determination of milk samples collected from retail outlets in Beijing by the DLTRRC-CIA and traditional ELISA kit.

    No full text
    a<p>Each was determined with 3 repeats.</p>b<p>ND not detectable.</p><p>Determination of milk samples collected from retail outlets in Beijing by the DLTRRC-CIA and traditional ELISA kit.</p

    A comparative analysis of the developed DLTRRC-CIA with various immunoassay formats and commercial kits for CAP and CLE detection in standard solution.

    No full text
    <p>A comparative analysis of the developed DLTRRC-CIA with various immunoassay formats and commercial kits for CAP and CLE detection in standard solution.</p

    Kinetic measurement of chemiluminescence (CL) output intensity (RLU) for Super Signal and Visiglo Plus substrates catalyzed by HRP and ALP in the developed DLTRRC-CIA.

    No full text
    <p>Kinetic measurement of chemiluminescence (CL) output intensity (RLU) for Super Signal and Visiglo Plus substrates catalyzed by HRP and ALP in the developed DLTRRC-CIA.</p

    Recovery of spiked CAP and CLE in milk.

    No full text
    a<p>Each value was repeated five times.</p>b<p>Not detectable, </p><p>Recovery of spiked CAP and CLE in milk.</p

    Schematic representation of DLTRRC-CIA for quantitative determination of CAP and CLE.

    No full text
    <p>Schematic representation of DLTRRC-CIA for quantitative determination of CAP and CLE.</p

    Normalized standard curve by developed DLTRRC-CIA for CAP (a) and CLE (b) under optimized conditions compared to the standard curve obtained by reverse competitive CL-ELISA and traditional ELISA method.

    No full text
    <p>Normalized standard curve by developed DLTRRC-CIA for CAP (a) and CLE (b) under optimized conditions compared to the standard curve obtained by reverse competitive CL-ELISA and traditional ELISA method.</p

    CR of CAP and CLE in DLTRRC-CIA with some structurally related and unrelated compounds.

    No full text
    <p>CR of CAP and CLE in DLTRRC-CIA with some structurally related and unrelated compounds.</p
    corecore