6 research outputs found

    Two Essays on Turfgrass Sod Producer Preferences for Certification and Royalty Fee Structures and Oklahoma City Commercial Businesses� Willingness to Participate in Outdoor Irrigation Water Conservation Programs

    Get PDF
    In the first article, we surveyed turfgrass sod producers to determine theirpreferences for different sod cultivars contingent on certain traits and their price.Turfgrass breeders have developed turfgrass cultivars exhibiting traits for improved long term maintenance, appearance, utility, and resistance to abiotic and biotic stressors. Asuniversities seek to capture revenue to cover research costs, these cultivars are typicallyprotected by intellectual property rights. Holders of these rights generally requireproducers to be licensed to produce and sell proprietary cultivars, as well as pay royalties, impacting the marketability of cultivars available for sale. An online turfgrass preference survey with sod producers using a discrete choice experiment was conducted in Spring 2015. The design incorporated attributes such as cultivar, certification agency, fee structure, maintenance reduction potential, and price per square foot. Results from the analysis indicated that producers preferred genetically modified breeds and fee structures that allow producers to share the market uncertainty with the breed developers. In the second article, we dealt with understanding outdoor irrigation water conservationin the commercial sector. Periodic drought stress in Oklahoma has forced utilitiesdepartments, including Oklahoma City, to seek ways of conserving water in both theresidential and non-residential sectors. Most of these efforts largely targeted theresidential sector. In this study, we identified the willingness of commercial businesses inthe Oklahoma City metro area to participate in water conservation methods such asinstalling soil moisture sensors, smart irrigation controllers for their businesses andparticipating in voluntary irrigation assessments. We conducted a mail survey of 2784Oklahoma City Water Utilities� commercial customers in which we used data fromcontingent valuation questions to elicit the financial savings on water that wouldencourage participation in a landscape irrigation assessment or adoption of smartirrigation controllers. A sub sample experimental group received detailed informationabout future block rate water price increases. The results of the study indicated that, atcurrent water utilities price rates commercial businesses are unlikely to adopt theseprograms, but that including information about future price rate hikes may induce asubset of businesses to participate.Agricultural Economic

    Economic value of sportfishing trips to Oklahoma lakes

    Get PDF
    The Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service periodically issues revisions to its publications. The most current edition is made available. For access to an earlier edition, if available for this title, please contact the Oklahoma State University Library Archives by email at [email protected] or by phone at 405-744-6311

    Two-Stage Estimation to Control for Unobservables in a Recreation Demand Model with Unvisited Sites

    No full text
    The role of unobserved site attributes is a growing concern in recreation demand modeling. One solution in random utility models (RUM) involves separating estimation into two stages, where the RUM model is estimated with alternative-specific constants (ASCs) in the first stage, and the estimated ASCs are regressed on the observed site attributes in the second stage. Prior work estimates the second stage with OLS and 2SLS regression. We present an application with censored regression in the second stage. We show OLS produces inconsistent parameters when there are unvisited sites with no estimable ASCs and that censored regression avoids this problem

    Turfgrass producer preferences for certification and royalty fee structures

    No full text
    Plant scientists have bred turfgrass varieties to create more desirable traits for long-term maintenance, appearance, utility, and resistance to abiotic and biotic stressors. As universities seek to capture revenue to cover research costs, these varieties are increasingly protected by intellectual property rights such as US plant patents and plant variety protection certificates. Producers require license to produce and sell proprietary varieties, and are required to pay royalties, impacting the types of varieties marketed for sale. Therefore, turf breeders must identify producer demand for various grass varieties, and understand their marketability. An online turfgrass preference survey with sod producers using a discrete choice experiment was conducted in Spring 2015. The design incorporated attributes such as variety, certification agency, fee structure, maintenance reduction potential, and price per square foot. Results from the analysis indicate that producers preferred genetically modified breeds and fee structures that allow producers to share the cost with the breed developers
    corecore