Roadside memorials : a multidisciplinary approach

Constitutes a collection of papers from the first International Symposium on Roadside Memorials, held at the University of New England in 2004. The symposium brought together scholars from Canada, the United States, United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand

Subject portals : a new information delivery model to enhance teaching and learning

This paper describes a UK project which is developing subject portals to support digital communities of scholars in four disciplines: humanities, life sciences, social sciences, and engineering. These portals address the need for simpler and more uniform access to two key sources of networked information resources: quality assured information freely available on the Web, and subscription-based services such as abstracting and indexing tools, e-journals, and digitised collections

Activation of the eNOS-NO signalling pathway enhances transcription factor-mediated direct cardiac reprogramming of human fibroblasts

Abstract of a poster presentation to: ESGCT XXV Anniversary Congress in Collaboration with the German Society for Gene Therapy, October 17-20, 2017 Berlin, German

Challenges and facilitators in delivering optimal care at the End of Life for older patients: A scoping review on the clinicians’ perspective

The concepts and elements determining quality of care at the End of Life may vary across professional groups but there is consensus that high-quality care at the End of Life is beneficial for the patient, families, health systems and society at large. This scoping review aimed to elucidate gaps in the delivery of this specific type of care in older people from the clinicians’ perspective, and to identify potential solutions to both improve this care and promote work satisfaction by the involved clinicians. Twelve studies published since 2010 with data from 18 countries identified four major gaps: (1) Core clinical competencies; (2) Shared decision-making; (3) Health care system, environmental context, and resources; and (4) Organisational leadership, culture and legislation. Multiple suggestions for staff communications training, multidisciplinary mentoring, and advance care planning alignment with patient wishes were identified. However, a clear picture arose of consistently unmet needs that have been previously highlighted in research for more than a decade. This indicates poor uptake of previous recommendations and highlights the difficulties in changing the service culture to ensure provision of optimal services at the End of Life. Future investigations on the reasons for poor uptake and identification of effective approaches to execute the agreed recommendations are warranted

Association of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Antibody Vaccine Response with Infection Severity in Patients with Cancer: A National COVID Cancer Cross-sectional Evaluation

Importance: Accurate identification of patient groups with the lowest level of protection following COVID-19 vaccination is important to better target resources and interventions for the most vulnerable populations. It is not known whether SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing has clinical utility for high-risk groups, such as people with cancer. Objective: To evaluate whether spike protein antibody vaccine response (COV-S) following COVID-19 vaccination is associated with the risk of SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infection or hospitalization among patients with cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a population-based cross-sectional study of patients with cancer from the UK as part of the National COVID Cancer Antibody Survey. Adults with a known or reported cancer diagnosis who had completed their primary SARS-CoV-2 vaccination schedule were included. This analysis ran from September 1, 2021, to March 4, 2022, a period covering the expansion of the UK's third-dose vaccination booster program. Interventions: Anti-SARS-CoV-2 COV-S antibody test (Elecsys; Roche). Main Outcomes and Measures: Odds of SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infection and COVID-19 hospitalization. Results: The evaluation comprised 4249 antibody test results from 3555 patients with cancer and 294230 test results from 225272 individuals in the noncancer population. The overall cohort of 228827 individuals (patients with cancer and the noncancer population) comprised 298479 antibody tests. The median age of the cohort was in the age band of 40 and 49 years and included 182741 test results (61.22%) from women and 115737 (38.78%) from men. There were 279721 tests (93.72%) taken by individuals identifying as White or White British. Patients with cancer were more likely to have undetectable anti-S antibody responses than the general population (199 of 4249 test results [4.68%] vs 376 of 294230 [0.13%]; P <.001). Patients with leukemia or lymphoma had the lowest antibody titers. In the cancer cohort, following multivariable correction, patients who had an undetectable antibody response were at much greater risk for SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infection (odds ratio [OR], 3.05; 95% CI, 1.96-4.72; P <.001) and SARS-CoV-2-related hospitalization (OR, 6.48; 95% CI, 3.31-12.67; P <.001) than individuals who had a positive antibody response. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cross-sectional study suggest that COV-S antibody testing allows the identification of patients with cancer who have the lowest level of antibody-derived protection from COVID-19. This study supports larger evaluations of SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing. Prevention of SARS-CoV-2 transmission to patients with cancer should be prioritized to minimize impact on cancer treatments and maximize quality of life for individuals with cancer during the ongoing pandemic.

A Core Outcome Measurement Set for Pediatric Critical Care

Objectives:  To identify a PICU Core Outcome Measurement Set (PICU COMS), a set of measures that can be used to evaluate the PICU Core Outcome Set (PICU COS) domains in PICU patients and their families. Design:  A modified Delphi consensus process. Setting:  Four webinars attended by PICU physicians and nurses, pediatric surgeons, rehabilitation physicians, and scientists with expertise in PICU clinical care or research (n = 35). Attendees were from eight countries and convened from the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators Pediatric Outcomes STudies after PICU Investigators and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network PICU COS Investigators. Subjects:  Measures to assess outcome domains of the PICU COS are as follows: cognitive, emotional, overall (including health-related quality of life), physical, and family health. Measures evaluating social health were also considered. Interventions:  None. Measurements and Main Results:  Measures were classified as general or additional based on generalizability across PICU populations, feasibility, and relevance to specific COS domains. Measures with high consensus, defined as 80% agreement for inclusion, were selected for the PICU COMS. Among 140 candidate measures, 24 were delineated as general (broadly applicable) and, of these, 10 achieved consensus for inclusion in the COMS (7 patient-oriented and 3 family-oriented). Six of the seven patient measures were applicable to the broadest range of patients, diagnoses, and developmental abilities. All were validated in pediatric populations and have normative pediatric data. Twenty additional measures focusing on specific populations or in-depth evaluation of a COS subdomain also met consensus for inclusion as COMS additional measures. Conclusions:  The PICU COMS delineates measures to evaluate domains in the PICU COS and facilitates comparability across future research studies to characterize PICU survivorship and enable interventional studies to target long-term outcomes after critical illness.</p