3 research outputs found

    MOESM1 of Sarcopenic obesity assessed using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) can predict cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective observational study

    No full text
    Additional file 1. Clinical characteristics and medications at baseline in the four categories of body composition (normal, sarcopenia, obesity, and sarcopenic obesity) classified using android fat mass, percent of body fat and body mass index. The baseline characteristics and medications in the four categories of body composition classified according to each indicator of obesity other than A/G ratio are shown in Tables S1–S6. Tables S1, S3, S5. The baseline characteristics when using android fat mass, percent of body fat, and body mass index for the classification of obesity, respectively. Tables S2, S4, S6. The medication when using android fat mass, percent of body fat, and body mass index for the classification of obesity, respectively

    Ipragliflozin Reduces Epicardial Fat Accumulation in Non-Obese Type 2 Diabetic Patients with Visceral Obesity: A Pilot Study

    No full text
    <p><strong>Article full text</strong></p> <p><br> The full text of this article can be found <a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13300-017-0279-y"><b>here</b>.</a><br> <br> <strong>Provide enhanced content for this article</strong><br> If you are an author of this publication and would like to provide additional enhanced content for your article then please contact <u>[email protected]</u>.<br> <br> The journal offers a range of additional features designed to increase visibility and readership. All features will be thoroughly peer reviewed to ensure the content is of the highest scientific standard and all features are marked as ‘peer reviewed’ to ensure readers are aware that the content has been reviewed to the same level as the articles they are being presented alongside. Moreover, all sponsorship and disclosure information is included to provide complete transparency and adherence to good publication practices. This ensures that however the content is reached the reader has a full understanding of its origin. No fees are charged for hosting additional open access content.<br> <br> Other enhanced features include, but are not limited to:<br> • Slide decks<br> • Videos and animations<br> • Audio abstracts<br> • Audio slides<u></u></p> <p> </p> <p> </p

    Biochemical Gas Sensors (Biosniffers) Using Forward and Reverse Reactions of Secondary Alcohol Dehydrogenase for Breath Isopropanol and Acetone as Potential Volatile Biomarkers of Diabetes Mellitus

    No full text
    This study describes two biosniffers to determine breath acetone and isopropanol (IPA) levels and applies them for breath measurement in healthy subjects and diabetic patients. Secondary alcohol dehydrogenase (S-ADH) can reduce acetone and oxidize nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH to NAD<sup>+</sup>) in a weak acid environment. NADH can be excited by 340 nm excitation lights and subsequently emit 490 nm fluorescence. Therefore, acetone can be measured by the decrease in NADH fluorescence intensity. S-ADH can also oxidize IPA and reduce NAD<sup>+</sup> to NADH when it is in an alkaline environment. Thus, IPA can be detected by the increase of fluorescence. The developed biosniffers show rapid response, high sensitivity and high selectivity. The breath acetone and IPA analysis in healthy subjects shows that the mean values were 750.0 ± 434.4 ppb and 15.4 ± 11.3 ppb. Both acetone and IPA did not show a statistical difference among different genders and ages. The breath acetone analysis for diabetic patients shows a mean value of 1207.7 ± 689.5 ppb, which was higher than that of healthy subjects (<i>p</i> < 1 × 10<sup>–6</sup>). In particularly, type-1 diabetic (T1D) patients exhaled a much higher concentration of acetone than type-2 diabetic (T2D) patients (<i>p</i> < 0.01). The breath IPA also had a higher concentration in diabetic patients (23.1 ± 20.1 ppb, <i>p</i> < 0.01), but only T2D patients presented a statistical difference (23.9 ± 21.3 ppb, <i>p</i> < 0.01). These findings are worthwhile in the study of breath biomarkers for diabetes mellitus diagnosis. Additionally, the developed biosniffers provide a new technique for volatolomics research
    corecore