3 research outputs found

    Indirect ballistic injury to the liver: Case report and review of literature

    Get PDF
    AbstractIntroductionPenetrating injury due to gunshot wounds is a common problem seen in trauma centres around South Africa. Gunshot wounds can injure organs directly or may cause indirect injury. The temporary cavity is responsible for injury to organs distant to the wound tract. Organs with higher density such as bone or liver are more prone to injury due to the temporary cavity.Presentation of caseA 25 year old male patient sustained a gunshot wound to the right lower chest from a handgun. He was haemodynamically and metabolically stable with no evidence of peritonitis. CT scan of the abdomen revealed a Grade 2 injury of the liver. There was subcutaneous emphysema along the tract of the bullet. No injury to the lung or pleura was reported. The patient was explored laparoscopically to rule out diaphragmatic injury. At exploration the peritoneum was not breeched but the liver had a grade two laceration caused by an indirect ballistic injuryDiscussionPenetrating trauma to the right lower chest can potentially injure multiple organs. CT scan can reliably diagnose the bullet tract as well as solid organ injuries. In this case the diaphragm was contused and the liver was lacerated by energy created by the temporary cavity. The difference in severity of the injury of these organs is related to the pliability of the tissue.ConclusionGunshot wounds can injure organs directly as well as those located close to the bullet tract. These injuries may be found in adjacent cavities not traversed by the bullet. A high index of suspicion, as well as imaging, is important to diagnose and grade these injuries. The possibility of indirect ballistic injury should always be kept in mind when managing patients with gunshot wound even in the lower velocity handgun injuries

    Small bowel obstruction secondary to paravesical hernia

    Get PDF
    Background: Bowel obstruction in the setting of the unscarred abdomen can be due to a wide variety of causes. Internal hernias are a rare cause of bowel obstruction with paravesical hernia being exceedingly rare. Paravesical hernia should form part of the differential diagnosis in the patient presenting with bowel obstruction. Prompt management and reduction of the incarcerated bowel are essential. This will prevent further complications especially related to bowel ischemia. Case summary: The patient presented with a classical history of small bowel obstruction. Abdominal X-ray revealed distended loops of small bowel and absence of air in the rectum. An exploratory laparotomy revealed a paravesical internal hernia. A loop of terminal ileum had incarcerated and was the cause of the bowel obstruction. The defect was repaired after reducing the bowel and the patient made an uneventful recovery. Conclusion: Internal paravesical hernia although extremely rare should form part of the differential diagnosis in the patient presenting with small bowel obstruction especially in the previously unscarred abdomen. If the obstruction is complete then prompt exploration via laparotomy or laparoscopy is required. Delays in definitive management may result in marginally viable bowel becoming ischemic and requiring bowel resection

    SARS-CoV-2 vaccination modelling for safe surgery to save lives: data from an international prospective cohort study

    No full text
    Background Preoperative SARS-CoV-2 vaccination could support safer elective surgery. Vaccine numbers are limited so this study aimed to inform their prioritization by modelling. Methods The primary outcome was the number needed to vaccinate (NNV) to prevent one COVID-19-related death in 1 year. NNVs were based on postoperative SARS-CoV-2 rates and mortality in an international cohort study (surgical patients), and community SARS-CoV-2 incidence and case fatality data (general population). NNV estimates were stratified by age (18-49, 50-69, 70 or more years) and type of surgery. Best- and worst-case scenarios were used to describe uncertainty. Results NNVs were more favourable in surgical patients than the general population. The most favourable NNVs were in patients aged 70 years or more needing cancer surgery (351; best case 196, worst case 816) or non-cancer surgery (733; best case 407, worst case 1664). Both exceeded the NNV in the general population (1840; best case 1196, worst case 3066). NNVs for surgical patients remained favourable at a range of SARS-CoV-2 incidence rates in sensitivity analysis modelling. Globally, prioritizing preoperative vaccination of patients needing elective surgery ahead of the general population could prevent an additional 58 687 (best case 115 007, worst case 20 177) COVID-19-related deaths in 1 year. Conclusion As global roll out of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination proceeds, patients needing elective surgery should be prioritized ahead of the general population.The aim of this study was to inform vaccination prioritization by modelling the impact of vaccination on elective inpatient surgery. The study found that patients aged at least 70 years needing elective surgery should be prioritized alongside other high-risk groups during early vaccination programmes. Once vaccines are rolled out to younger populations, prioritizing surgical patients is advantageous
    corecore