7 research outputs found

    Sociodemographic and obstetric factors associated with the type of delivery<sup>‡</sup>.

    No full text
    <p>Note: <sup>‡</sup>estimates controlling for fixed effects by geographical region (Northwest, Northeast, Central-North, East, West, Central-South, Southwest, Southeast).</p>φ<p>At time of the most recent child birth. Reported odds ratios [95%CI].</p><p>**p<0.01,</p><p>*p<0.05,</p>+<p>p<0.10.</p

    Care indicators during the last pregnancy and delivery.

    No full text
    <p>Note: estimations based on the effect of the survey design.</p><p>*Refer to differences between vaginal delivery, and emergency and planned type of cesarean section.</p

    Access to prescribed medicines (ATPM) regardless of place according to individual characteristics and specific environment and affiliation to the Seguro Popular.

    No full text
    <p>Note: Estimates considering the survey design. *Estimated figures on the total population who received a prescription from medical personnel. **Calculation per adult equivalent. $ Rural: <2500 inhabitants, Urban: 2500–100000, Metropolitan: >100000.</p

    Sociodemographic profile of the study population, by type of delivery.

    No full text
    <p>Note: estimations based on the effect of the survey design.</p><p>*Refer to differences between vaginal delivery, and emergency and planned type of cesarean section.</p><p>**Refer to national level estimations.</p

    Sociodemographic and obstetric background at the time of the last childbirth<sup>φ</sup>.

    No full text
    <p>Note: Estimations based on the effect of the survey design.</p>φ<p>At time of the most recent child birth.</p><p>*Refer to differences between vaginal delivery, and emergency and planned type of cesarean section.</p

    Differences in the study population according to Seguro Popular Affiliation.

    No full text
    <p>Note: Estimates considering the survey design.</p><p>Differences in the study population according to Seguro Popular Affiliation.</p

    Sociodemographic and obstetric factors associated with cesarean section<sup>‡</sup>.

    No full text
    <p>Source: Mexican National Nutrition Survey, 2012. Note: <sup>‡</sup>Adjusted logistic model. Estimates controlling for fixed effects by geographical region (Northwest, Northeast, Central-North, East, West, Central-South, Southwest, and Southeast). No statistically significant variables (p<0.10): 1–6 and 7–9 yrs. of schooling; Health Insurance; Indigenous (Ref.: Non-indigenous); Beneficiary of the Oportunidades program (Ref.: Non-beneficiary); Quantile of annual expenditure per resident: II–III; Urban and metropolitan area (Ref.: Rural); First prenatal consultation during the 1st trimester; Frequent prenatal care provider: Secretariat of Health and Private (Ref.: Social Security); Childbirth care provider: Secretariat of Health (Ref.: Social Security). Adjustment statistics: Akaike (AIC) = 8,159; Log likelihood = −4,042; Hosmer-Lemeshow χ2 = 12.8 (Prob> χ2 = 0.118).</p
    corecore