Where there is no anaesthetist: the role of obstetrician - administered spinal anaesthesia for emergency caesarean section

Context: Shortage of anaesthetic manpower is a stark reality in developing countries like Nigeria where “waiting for the anaesthetist” has been repeatedly identified as a cause of phase 3 delays. This has led to widespread abuse of ketamine anaesthesia for emergency caesarean section in private hospital settings.Objectives: To determine the effect of single handed obstetrician-anesthetist administered spinal anesthesia for caesarean section on Decision-Delivery Interval (DDI), postoperative hospital stay, fetal and maternal outcome.Materials and Methods: A prospective analytical study comparing caesarean DDI between 42 consecutive emergency caesarean sections (CS) under Obstetrician-administered Spinal anesthesia (OASA) versus 42 women who had locum anesthetist administered spinal anesthesia (LAASA) and an equal number who had ketamine anesthesia.Results: The DDI was about 2.5 fold shorter in the OASA (59.67 ± 9.40 minutes) compared with the LAASA (144.54 ± 28.00 minutes) group (pConclusion: Obstetrician-administered Spinal Anesthesia for emergency caesarean section reduces Decision-Delivery Interval and postoperative hospital stay. It is therefore judicious where there is no anesthetist. Moreover, it is superior to ketamine anesthesia for caesarean section.Keywords: Obstetric anaesthesia, Spinal anaesthesia, Caesarean section, Bupivacaine, KetamineTrop J Obstet Gynaecol, 30 (1), April 201

Have you seen a rape kit? A snapshot at the quality of care of rape survivors in Nigerian tertiary hospitals

Context: The rape kit has become a fundamental tool in the evaluation of the rape survivor in many countries. Itsavailability and use in Nigeria has however not been documented.Objective: To assess the current availability and usage of the rape kit in Nigerian tertiary hospitals, and evaluate the management of rape survivors.Methodology: Resident Doctors attending the Obstetrics and Gynaecology update course, held in Abuja in March,2009 were interviewed using a self-administered questionnaire assessing experience in rape management, knowledge about the rape kit and its availability, as well as current management of rape survivors.Results: There were 138 respondents from 25 tertiary hospitals, with a male-to-female ratio of 2.8:1 and a meanduration of 3.3 (SD 1.4) years in training. 120 (87%) had personally managed one or more rape survivor(s), but none of the respondents had ever seen a rape kit, and only 29% were aware of it. Although all the respondents indicated availability of emergency contraception, antibiotics and tetanus prophylaxis in their centres, only 32.4% had access to HBV vaccine, and about 8% indicated lack of HIV prophylaxis. Only 28.7% and 45.6% indicated access to clinical psychologists and medical social workers respectively.Conclusion: The rape kit is not available in Nigerian tertiary hospitals. We recommend its provision, and regulartraining of doctors, especially Obstetrics and Gynaecology Residents on rape management, to improve the care ofrape survivors in Nigeria.Key Words: Rape, Rape kit, Rape survivor, Nigeria

Decision-to-Delivery Interval and Obstetric Outcomes of Emergency Caesarean Sections in a Nigerian Teaching Hospital

Background: Prolonged Decision-to-Delivery interval (DDI) is associated with adverse maternal-foetal outcomes following emergency Caesarean section (EmCS). Objectives: To determine the DDI, predictive factors, and the foeto-maternal outcomes of patients that had EmCS in a Nigerian Teaching Hospital. Methods: A descriptive study of all EmCS performed at the Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex (OAUTHC), Ile-Ife, Nigeria, from 1st June 2020 to 31st May 2021, was conducted. Relevant data were extracted from the documentations of doctors, nurses and anaesthetists using a designed proforma. The data obtained were analysed using the IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 25. Results: The median (IQR) DDI was 297 (175-434) minutes. Only one patient was delivered within the recommended DDI of 30 minutes. The most common cause of prolonged DDI was delay in procuring materials for CS by patients’ relatives(s)/caregiver(s) (264, 85.2%). Repeat CS (AOR = 4.923, 95% CI 1.09-22.36; p = 0.039), prolonged decision-to-operating room time (AOR = 8.22, 95% CI 1.87-8.66; p 150 minutes was significantly associated with maternal morbidity (p = 0.001), stillbirth (p = 0.008) and early neonatal death (p = 0.049). Conclusion: The recommended DDI of 30 minutes for CS is challenging in the setting studied. To improve foeto-maternal outcomes, efforts to reduce the DDI should be pursued vigorously, using the recommended 30 minutes as a benchmark

Knowledge, Attitude and Uptake of Pap Smear among Female Healthcare Professionals in a Nigerian Teaching Hospital

Background: Despite the high prevalence of cervical cancer (CC) in Nigeria, the uptake of screening services, including Pap smear, remains poor, even amongst healthcare providers. Objective: To assess Pap smear knowledge, attitude, and uptake among female healthcare professionals (FHPs). Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted at the University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital (UITH), Kwara State, Nigeria, using a self-administered questionnaire. Results: A majority (343, 98.6%) of the FHPs knew Pap smear. Five (26.3%) medical laboratory scientists did not know what a Pap smear was. All the nurses, doctors, pharmacists, physiotherapists and medical social workers knew Pap smear. Only a fifth (71; 20.4%) of the FHPs had ever done a Pap smear. The most common reason cited for not having done a Pap smear was lack of time (109; 31.3%). There was a relationship between age and uptake of Pap smear (p = 0.024). Only 188 (54%) of the FHPs had ever recommended Pap smear to other women. Conclusion: Despite the high level of knowledge of Pap smear amongst FHPs in Nigeria, attitude and uptake remain poor. There is a need for further training and education of FHPs on the benefits of CC screening to increase their uptake and improve their effectiveness in promoting positive attitudes towards CC screening and prevention in the general population