30 research outputs found

    PCA3 Silencing Sensitizes Prostate Cancer Cells to Enzalutamide-mediated Androgen Receptor Blockade

    No full text
    Background/Aim: Prostate cancer (PCa) is an androgen-dependent disease. Novel anti-androgens (i.e. enzalutamide) have recently been developed for the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Evidence is accumulating that prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) is involved in androgen receptor (AR) signaling. Here, in combination with enzalutamide-mediated AR blockade, we investigated the effect of PCA3 targeting on the viability of PCa cells. Materials and Methods: In hormone-sensitive LNCaP cells, AR-overexpressing LNCaP-AR(+) cells and VCaP cells (representing CRPC), PCA3 was silenced using siRNA oligonucleotides. Gene expression and cell viability was assessed in PCA3-silenced and/or AR-blocked cells. Results: PCA3 targeting reduced the expression of AR-related genes (i.e. prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and prostate-specific transcript 1 (non-protein coding) (PCGEM1)) and potentiated the effect of enzalutamide. Proliferation of PCa cells was suppressed upon PCA3 silencing with a greater effect in LNCaP-AR(+) cells. Furthermore, PCA3 silencing sensitized PCa cells to enzalutamide-induced loss of cell growth. Conclusion: PCA3, as a therapeutic target in PCa, might be used to potentiate AR antagonists

    Ovarian ablation by radiation therapy: Is it still an option for the ablation of ovarian function in endocrine responsive premenopausal breast cancer patients?

    No full text
    Surgical or medical ovarian ablation is likely to be the treatment of choice at the current timed radiation ablation (RA) can be still a reasonable alternative. The efficacy and toxicity of radiation therapy (RT) for ovarian function suppression in 118 premenopausal breast cancer patients were retrospectively evaluated. The median age was 39 years (range 21-52 years). RT was given with either Co-60 or 15 MV photons of the linear accelerator. The median total dose was 15 Gy in 4 consecutive fractions (range 5 Gy single fraction-36 Gy in 18 fractions over 3.5 weeks). The endpoint for treatment efficacy was I menstrual status. Amenorrhea was noted in 113 of 118 patients (96%) in 6 months following RA. Five patients (4%) who had still normal menstrual functioning after 6 months of RA underwent estradiol and follicle stimulating hormone measurements and were found to have premenopausal levels. No acute Grade 3 or 4 (according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group radiation morbidity scoring criteria) toxicities were noted. With a median follow-up of 24.5 months (range: 6-167), no late severe complications that could be attributable to RT were reported. RA should be considered as an option for endocrine responsive premenopausal breast cancer patients and can be easily delivered when postoperative or palliative irradiation is given. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved
    corecore