4 research outputs found
Promoting Excellence and Demonstrated Competence for Nuclear Security Training
The international community has spent considerable time, money, and effort attempting to establish a series of national and regional Centres of Excellence (COEs), also known as Nuclear Security Training and Support Centres (NSSCs). These Centres tend to have a wide variety of objectives, structures, and methods of delivery. Unsurprisingly, no internationally accepted standard exists on how they should operate. The IAEA has produced some excellent guidance (TECDOC 1734), but by virtue of its role cannot provide standards for benchmarking success. Against this backdrop, the World Institute for Nuclear Security (WINS) launched the WINS Academy, an initiative to provide practitioners with opportunities to earn certification in Nuclear Security Management. Underpinning the programme is certification against the ISO 9001 and ISO 29990 quality management standards, which provide an internationally recognised external benchmark of quality; demonstrate credibility, competence and professionalism; and give potential employers and others in the industry an objective measurement of participants’ knowledge. WINS recommends that NSSCs follow a similar model, in which their participants receive an evaluation leading to qualification or certification, and utilizing professional standards developed by a recognised, respected certifying body rather than developing their own ad hoc arrangements, which are ultimately unsustainable. With the end of the Nuclear Security Summit (NSS) process, sustainability is the key consideration for many nuclear security training centres; WINS has sought political and industry commitments to sustain security training programmes, and these efforts were recognised in a Joint Statement on Certified Training for Nuclear Security Management at the 2016 NSS
Education on Nuclear Safeguards for European Nuclear Engineering Students
The knowledge retention problem in the nuclear field was acknowledged by the OECD in 2000. ESARDA reacted to that with a strategy to tackle the problem and created a Working Group on Training and Knowledge Management (ESARDA WG TKM). The final objective of the ESARDA WG TKM is the setup of course modules to an internationally recognised reference standard.
This project is in line with the movement of establishing a European curriculum for Nuclear Engineering. Teaching in the Nuclear Safeguards field is indeed strongly influenced by national history so the objective of the course is to provide homogeneous material in safeguards and non proliferation matters at the European level.
This paper reports on the feedback of the course that was held by some of the leading experts in the field of nuclear safeguards in Europe. Its content deals with the general background of safeguards legislation and Treaties, the nuclear fuel cycle, various safeguards techniques, verification technologies and the evolution of safeguards. The audience - 40 university students and 5 young professionals (STUK and JRC) – from 12 different European countries was highly interested and gave positive feedback.
The course has been introduced in the course database of the European Nuclear Education Network on the website http://www.neptuno-cs.de. A recognition as academic course of 3 credits under the European Credit Transfer System has been requested to the Belgian Nuclear higher Education Network. In the future this course will be repeated on a regular basis and evaluated, aiming to achieve recognition by the European Nuclear Education Network (ENEN). With an ENEN-label it is included in the list of optional courses for a European Masters Degree in Nuclear Engineering.JRC.G.8-Nuclear safeguard