Activity of osimertinib in a patient with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer harboring HER2 exon 19, p.L755P mutation : case report

Publisher Copyright: © Translational Lung Cancer Research. All rights reserved.Background: Recurrent in-frame insertions within exon 20 causing duplication of amino acids Tyrosine-Valine-Methionine-Alanine (YVMA) represent 80% of all HER2 alterations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), anti-HER2 monoclonal antibodies and HER2 directed antibody-drug conjugates have been evaluated in patients with HER2 mutated NSCLC. Limited data are available regarding the activity of these agents in exon 19 alterations. Osimertinib, a 3rd generation EGFR-TKI, has been found in pre-clinical studies to decrease growth of NSCLC with HER2 exon 19 aberrations. Case Description: A 68-year-old female with a past medical history of type 2 diabetes and minimal smoking was diagnosed with stage IV NSCLC. Next generation sequencing on tumor tissue demonstrated an ERBB2 exon 19 c.2262_2264delinsTCC, p.(L755P) mutation. After five lines of treatment that included chemotherapy, chemoimmunotherapy and investigational agents the patient’s disease was progressing. At this time her functional status remained good, therefore clinical trials were explored however, none were available. Based on findings from pre-clinical studies, the patient was commenced on osimertinib 80 mg OD and achieved a partial response (PR) according to RESIST criteria both intra- and extracranially. Conclusions: This is the first report to our knowledge to demonstrate activity of osimertinib in a patient with NSCLC harboring HER2 exon 19, p.L755P mutation resulting in intra- and extracranial response. In the future, osimertinib could become a targeted treatment for patients harboring exon19 ERBB2 point mutations.Peer reviewe

Comparison of Two Standard Treatment Approaches in Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Abstract Issa Mohamad Objectives To compare outcomes and toxicity of two standard treatment approaches of advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods Between 2010 and 2016, patients with NPC, stage II–IVa, treated with induction chemotherapy (IC) (TPF), followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) (induction group), or CCRT, followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) (PF) (no-induction group), were retrospectively reviewed. CCRT included platinum-based chemotherapy with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Survival outcomes, the pattern of failures, toxicity, and predictors for survival outcomes were evaluated. Results A total of 110 patients were included, 65 in the induction group and 45 in the no-induction group. There were no significant differences in the DFS and overall survival (OS) at 3 years between the two groups. On multivariate analysis, performance status (1 vs. 0) predicted worse OS. The 3-year cumulative incidence rates for local, regional, and distant failures were 58.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.4–89%), 58.00% (95% CI: 8–88.8%), and 63.90% (95% CI: 14.1–90.2%), respectively. IC had more frequent acute grade (G) II anemia (13 vs. 1, p < 0.01), late G II brain toxicity (4 vs. 1, p < 0.01), and late G II dysphagia (32 vs. 11, p = 0.01). Conclusions Survival outcomes were comparable between the two groups. IC had more frequent acute G II anemia and late G II brain and esophageal toxicities

Relationship between HER-2 overexpression and brain metastasis in esophageal cancer patients

AIM: To study if HER-2 overexpression by locally advanced esophageal cancers increase the chance of brain metastasis following esophagectomy

Once Daily High-dose Radiation (≥60 Gy) Treatment in Limited Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: To investigate outcomes and prognostic factors in patients treated with once daily high-dose (≥60 Gy) radiation therapy (HDRT) and concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy in limited stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC). While we await current phase III trials to determine optimal radiation dose fractionation schemes in LS-SCLC, we report our experience in LS-SCLC with once daily HDRT. We hypothesized that HDRT would achieve similar efficacy and tolerability as twice daily therapy. METHODS: We conducted a single institution retrospective review of all patients with LS-SCLC who underwent curative intent treatment from 2005-2013. Patients treated with HDRT (≥60 Gy) and concurrent chemotherapy (cisplatin or carboplatin and etoposide) were included in our analysis. Clinicopathologic variables assessed include gender, performance status, time to treatment, response to treatment, toxicity, volumetric tumor response at 3 months, and use of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI). RESULTS: 42 patients with LS-SCLC who initiated concurrent chemoradiation from 2005 to 2013 were included in the analysis. 38 patients (90%) completed definitive treatment to the lung; 16 (38%) also completed PCI. Median failure free survival (FFS) and overall survival (OS) were 11.9 and 23.1 months, respectively. Two-year and 5-year OS rates were 47% (CI=30-62%) and 21% (CI=7-38%), respectively. On univariate analysis, PCI was associated with improved FFS but this was not significant (p=0.18). Gender was the only co-variate significantly associated with statistical differences in FFS (p=0.03) and OS (p=0.02). Grade 3 and 4 esophagitis were 10.5% and 2.6%, respectively. Pre-HDRT tumor volume and 3-month post-treatment tumor volume were both associated with FFS (p CONCLUSIONS: In this single institution series, daily HDRT demonstrated a 2-year OS of 47% in LS-SCLC. This compares well to the historical survival of daily fractionation (47%) from INT 0096 reported by Turris

SBRT to adrenal metastases provides high local control with minimal toxicity

Purpose: The adrenal glands are a common site of metastases because of their rich blood supply. Previously, adrenal metastases were treated with systemic chemotherapy or, more rarely, with surgical resection or palliative radiation therapy. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has recently emerged as an attractive noninvasive approach to definitively treat these lesions. We present our experience in treating adrenal metastases using SBRT and review the current literature. Methods and materials: This is a single-institution retrospective review of patients who received SBRT to adrenal metastases originating from various primary malignancies. Patients who were eligible for SBRT included those with limited metastatic disease (≤5 sites) with otherwise controlled metastatic disease and uncontrolled adrenal metastases. Results: Ten patients met the study's inclusion criteria and received SBRT doses of 30 to 48 Gy in 3 to 5 fractions. Acute sequelae of SBRT treatment included 4 patients with grades 1 or 2 nausea, 3 patients with grade 1 fatigue, and 1 with grade 1 diarrhea. The median follow-up was 6 months with a median overall survival of 9.9 months. One patient demonstrated progressive adrenal gland disease 18.8 months after SBRT treatment. Seven patients developed new distant metastases after treatment, with a median progression-free survival of 3.4 months. Three months after SBRT to the adrenal gland, 1 patient developed a gastrointestinal bleed. Conclusions: These results complement the limited existing body of literature by demonstrating that SBRT provides good control of treated adrenal gland metastasis; however, high-grade late toxicities may occur. More stringent dose constraint limits may prevent associated serious adverse events