28 research outputs found
Value from advanced wells completed with Inflow control devices (ICDs) in water flooding
Multi-solution well placement optimization using ensemble learning of surrogate models
Well location optimization aims to maximize the economic profit of oil and gas field development while respecting various constraints. The limitations of the currently available well placement optimization workflows are their 1) high computational requirements, which makes them inappropriate for full-field applications where a large number of wells have to be optimized using a computationally expensive simulation model; and 2) providing a single optimal solution, whereas on-site operational problems often add unforeseen constraints that result in adjustments to this optimal, inflexible scenario degrading its value. This study presents a multi-solution, surrogate models (SMs)-assisted optimization framework to deliver diverse, close-to-optimum well placement scenarios at a reasonable computational cost. Simultaneous Perturbation Stochastic Approximation (SPSA) algorithm is used as the optimizer while diversity in optimal solutions is achieved by multiple, parallel runs of the optimizer with different starting points. Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) is used as the SM, to partly substitute the computationally expensive reservoir model runs during the optimization process. A new, adjusted Latin Hypercube Sampling (aLHS) procedure is developed to generate initial training datasets with diverse well placement scenarios while respecting reservoir boundaries and well spacing constraints. An ensemble of CNNs is pre-trained using the generated dataset to enhance the robustness of the surrogate modeling as well as to allow estimation of the SM's prediction quality for new data points. The ensemble of CNNs is adaptively updated during the optimization process using selected new data points, to improve the SM's prediction accuracy. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first application of ensemble learning strategy to a well placement optimization problem. The added value of the framework is demonstrated by comparing three optimization approaches on the Brugge and Egg field benchmark case studies. The approaches are 1) ‘no SM’: using the actual reservoir model only, 2) ‘Offline SM’: the optimization is performed using SM-only that is pre-trained using initial training datasets generated by the actual reservoir model, and 3) ‘Online SM’: pre-trained CNNs are adaptively updated during the optimization process using new datasets generated using the actual reservoir model. The surrogate-assisted optimization approach substantially reduced the computation time, while a greater objective value was achieved by employing the adaptive learning strategy due to the enhanced prediction accuracy of the SMs. Multiple diverse solutions were obtained with different well locations but close-to-optimum objective values, which allows a more efficient exploration of the search space at a significantly reduced computational cost. The presented workflow integrates critical challenges that are correlated, yet often addressed independently, providing the much-required operational flexibility and computational efficiency to field operators when selecting from the optimal well placement scenarios
Stabilization of gas-lift oil wells by a nonlinear model predictive control scheme based on adaptive neural network models
Application of Numerical Flow Simulation Methods to Risk-Based Well Decommissioning Design
Hybrid Optimization Technique Allows Dynamic Completion Design and Control in Advanced Multilateral Wells with Multiple Types of Flow Control Devices
Hybrid Framework for Enhanced Dynamic Optimization of Intelligent Completion Design in Multilateral Wells with Multiple Types of Flow Control Devices
Development of a Multi-Solution Framework for Simultaneous Well Placement, Completion, and Control Optimization
Optimal field development and control aim to maximize the economic profit of oil and gas production. This, however, results in a complex optimization problem with a large number of correlated control variables at different levels (e.g. well locations, completions and controls) and a computationally expensive objective function (i.e. a simulated reservoir model). The typical limitations of the existing optimization frameworks are: (1) single-level optimization at a time (i.e. ignoring correlations among control variables at different levels); and (2) providing a single solution only whereas operational problems often add unexpected constraints likely to reduce the -optimal-, inflexible solution to a sub-optimal scenario. The developed framework in this paper is based on sequential iterative optimization of control variables at different levels. An ensemble of close-To-optimum solutions is selected from each level (e.g. for well location) and transferred to the next level of optimization (e.g. To control settings), and this loop continues until no significant improvement is observed in the objective value. Fit-for-purpose clustering techniques are developed to systematically select an ensemble of solutions, with maximum differences in control variables but close-To-optimum objective values, at each level of optimization. The framework also considers pre-defined constraints such as the minimum well spacing, irregular reservoir boundaries, and production/injection rate limits. The proposed framework has been tested on a benchmark case study, known as the Brugge field, to find the optimal well placement and control in two development scenarios: with conventional (surface control only) and intelligent wells (with additional zonal control using Interval Control Valves). Multiple solutions are obtained in both development scenarios, with different well locations and control settings but close-To-optimum objective values. We also show that suboptimal solutions from an early optimization level can approach and even outdo the optimal one at the higher-level optimization, highlighting the value of the here-developed multi-solution framework in exploring the search space as compared to the traditional single-solution approaches. The development scenario with intelligent completion installed at the optimal well location and optimally controlled during the production period achieved the maximum added value. Our results demonstrate the advantage of the developed multi-solution optimization framework in providing the much-needed operational flexibility to field operators
A Multisolution Optimization Framework for Well Placement and Control
Field development and control optimization aim to maximize the economic profit of oil and gas production. Mathematically, this results in a complex optimization problem with a large number of correlated decision (also known as control) variables of various types at different levels (e.g., at the level of well location variables or at the level of well production/injection control also know as well control or control settings variables) and a computationally expensive objective function (i.e., a reservoir simulation model). Current multilevel optimization frameworks provide only a single optimal scenario for a field development and control problem. However, unexpected problems that commonly arise during field development and operations can impose extra constraints, resulting in operators having to eventually select an adjusted, and most-likely, nonoptimal scenario. This work proposes a novel multisolution optimization framework, based on sequential optimization of control variables at multiple levels, providing the flexibility for operators to make optimal decisions while considering operational constraints. An ensemble of close-to-optimum solutions is selected from each level (e.g., from the well location optimization level) and transferred to the next level of optimization (e.g., to the control settings optimization), and this loop continues until no significant improvement is observed in the objective value. Fit-for-purpose clustering techniques are also developed to systematically select an ensemble of solutions, with maximum differences in well locations and control settings but small variation in the objective values, at each level of the optimization. The developed framework has been tested on two benchmark case studies. The results demonstrate high economic and operational efficiency of the developed multisolution framework as compared to the traditional approaches that rely on single-solution optimization. It is shown that suboptimal solutions from an early optimization level could approach the optimal solution at the next level(s), highlighting the value of the developed multisolution framework to deliver operational flexibility by a more efficient exploration of the search space