9 research outputs found

    OA stefna HÍ - greinargerð starfshóps um umsagnir

    No full text
    <p>Greinargerð frá starfshópi varðandi umsagnir um stefnudrögin sem bárust Vísindasviði</p

    Identification, contribution, attribution: digital scholarship, identity on the Web and ORCID

    No full text
    <p>Presentation given by Dr Gudmundur Thorisson during the Research Trends Virtual Seminar</p> <p>Part 2 - Evaluating Network Relationships</p

    D2.1 Kick off preparation, Communication plan and Website

    No full text
    <p>Effective communication is a crucial aspect of the ODIN project. The Communication Plan describes ODIN’s approach to engaging with and disseminating project outputs to key target audiences via various channels for the two-year duration of the project. Under this Plan, two items have already been completed: holding the first of three major community events (the “kick off” meeting) and launching a project website. This document outlines our communication strategy and provides a summary overview of our activities to date.</p

    D2.2 Kickoff report

    No full text
    <p>Abstract: The ODIN kickoff meeting provided an overview of the current persistent identifier discussion, as well as valuable input from key stakeholders to the ODIN project. Eleven presenters from a variety of stakeholder groups provided important perspectives, and the extensive discussion by all meeting participants further elaborated on key points. Based on the key scientific inputs, the following actions were identified:</p> <p>i) Encourage discussion and collaboration between communities<br>ii) Address specific issues of working with large number of small heterogeneous datasets<br>iii) Identify main interoperability use cases and define their business value<br>iv) Encourage development of novel tools to track the reuse of data</p

    The Individual and Scholarly Networks: Evaluating Network Connections - Discussion

    No full text
    <p>The Individual and Scholarly Networks was a two-part seminar organized by Research Trends and Elsevier Labs on January 22, 2013. Webcast live from Oxford, Amsterdam and New York, the presentations were recorded and are available here, along with links to slides and additional questions and answers. The seminar was led by Michael Taylor, Research Specialist at Elsevier Labs with additional contributions from Dr Henk Moed and Dr Gali Halevi of Research Trends</p> <p>Researchers are increasingly using social network type platforms to form relationships and ad-hoc research reading groups.</p> <p>Part 2 - Evaluating Network Relationships explored the related areas of altmetrics, contributorship and the culture of reference. Altmetrics is one of the most explosive areas of interest in bibliometric analysis and is increasing in importance.</p

    D1.3: First periodic report

    No full text
    <p>This first periodic report, as a contractual deliverable, describes at a high level the work that the ODIN consortium has carried out in the first year of the project, and an overview of the resources used in the project so far.</p

    D4.2: Workflow for interoperability

    No full text
    <p>We analyze the different persistent identifiers (PIDs) and the potential interoperability between them. We propose different approach to the interoperability between DataCite DOIs and ORCID IDs as well as between other PIDs. We present claim tools and data connections for different types of research objects.</p

    Recommendation of: ORCID Works Metadata Working Group

    No full text
    p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica} span.s1 {font: 7.0px Helvetica} <p>These are the recommendations of a working group that was formed in February 2013 with a charge to examine works metadata with respect to fitness for purpose in the ORCID registry and utility to producers and consumers of such metadata. The group membership represented a good cross-section of the ORCID constituency, with publishers, metadata experts, academic libraries, service providers, identifier experts, etc. all contributing. Discussions were held in a series of 7 conference calls over approximately as many months, together with commentary posted to a project site between calls.</p
    corecore