11 research outputs found

    A schematic diagram to illustrate the weighting and prioritization process used for prioritization of zoonotic diseases based on health professional and student opinion in Switzerland.

    No full text
    <p>The final disease score for each zoonosis was obtained by matching the levels for the different criteria with the respective mean utility values obtained from a choice-based Conjoint-Analysis questionnaire.</p

    The eight criteria, and the three levels used to describe each one of them, included in a Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis questionnaire on zoonotic disease prioritization in Switzerland, and their Rank (based on the Importance Score), the Importance Score (and Standard Deviation), and the Mean Utility Values of each criterion level, assigned by the health professional and student groups, respectively.

    No full text
    <p>The eight criteria, and the three levels used to describe each one of them, included in a Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis questionnaire on zoonotic disease prioritization in Switzerland, and their Rank (based on the Importance Score), the Importance Score (and Standard Deviation), and the Mean Utility Values of each criterion level, assigned by the health professional and student groups, respectively.</p

    The 16 notifiable or emerging zoonoses which were ranked using the sum of the Mean Utility Values obtained from a Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis questionnaire administered to both health professionals and students, and their relative rank difference, in a study on prioritization of zoonoses in Switzerland.

    No full text
    <p>The 16 notifiable or emerging zoonoses which were ranked using the sum of the Mean Utility Values obtained from a Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis questionnaire administered to both health professionals and students, and their relative rank difference, in a study on prioritization of zoonoses in Switzerland.</p

    Results of univariable logistic regression and receiver operating characteristics analysis of a cow being lame (numerical rating system according to Flower and Weary [38], NRS ≥ 2.5) using different RumiWatch noseband sensor and accelerometer (RumiWatch, ITIN+HOCH GmbH, Fütterungstechnik, Liestal, Switzerland) variables as predictors on the cutoff value with highest sensitivity + specificity.

    No full text
    <p>Results of univariable logistic regression and receiver operating characteristics analysis of a cow being lame (numerical rating system according to Flower and Weary [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0155796#pone.0155796.ref038" target="_blank">38</a>], NRS ≥ 2.5) using different RumiWatch noseband sensor and accelerometer (RumiWatch, ITIN+HOCH GmbH, Fütterungstechnik, Liestal, Switzerland) variables as predictors on the cutoff value with highest sensitivity + specificity.</p

    Schematic representation of the experimental procedure per study group.

    No full text
    <p>Accelerometers and noseband sensors (RumiWatch-units = RWU) are either attached (light grey) or attached and data recorded (dark grey). Video recording (VR) procedures used for habituation of study cows to the procedure are marked in light grey, VR used for lameness assessment are marked in dark grey. AS = Animal Selection, CE = clinical examination, AO = animal observation (heat, illness, gait scoring), FE = foot examination in the trimming chute.</p

    Use of Extended Characteristics of Locomotion and Feeding Behavior for Automated Identification of Lame Dairy Cows - Fig 2

    No full text
    <p><b>Box Plot representations of number of standing bouts (A) and walking speed<sub>calc</sub> (B) of group C (NRS ≤ 2), group LI (NRS = 2.5–3), group LII (NRS = 3.5) and group LIII (NRS ≥ 4).</b> Different characters (a, b, c) indicate a significant difference (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Numerical rating system (NRS) is according to Flower and Weary [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0155796#pone.0155796.ref038" target="_blank">38</a>].</p

    Using different RumiWatch noseband sensor and accelerometer (RumiWatch, ITIN+HOCH GmbH, Fütterungstechnik, Liestal, Switzerland) variable combinations as predictors of a cow being lame (numerical rating system according to Flower and Weary[38], NRS ≥ 2.5) in multivariable logistic regression and receiver operating characteristics analysis on different cutoff-values with corresponding sensitivity and specificity.

    No full text
    <p>Using different RumiWatch noseband sensor and accelerometer (RumiWatch, ITIN+HOCH GmbH, Fütterungstechnik, Liestal, Switzerland) variable combinations as predictors of a cow being lame (numerical rating system according to Flower and Weary[<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0155796#pone.0155796.ref038" target="_blank">38</a>], NRS ≥ 2.5) in multivariable logistic regression and receiver operating characteristics analysis on different cutoff-values with corresponding sensitivity and specificity.</p

    Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves of different logistic regression models to discriminate between lame (NRS ≥ 2.5) and non-lame cows (NRS ≤ 2).

    No full text
    <p>First model (-∙-) includes standing bouts (AUC = 0.81), second model (─) includes walking speed<sub>calc</sub> (AUC = 0.88); third model (- -) includes walking speed<sub>calc</sub> and the number of standing bouts (AUC = 0.96); fourth model (∙∙∙) includes walking speed<sub>calc</sub>, the number of standing bouts and the eating time (AUC = 0.96). NRS = numerical rating system according to Flower and Weary [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0155796#pone.0155796.ref038" target="_blank">38</a>]. AUC = area under the receiver operating characteristics curve.</p
    corecore