Mechanisms of glucocorticoid signalling

It has become increasingly clear that glucocorticoid signalling not only comprises the binding of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) to its response element (GRE), but also involves indirect regulation glucocorticoid-responsive genes by regulating or interacting with other transcription factors. In addition, they can directly regulate gene expression by binding to negative glucocorticoid response elements (nGREs), to simple GREs, to GREs, or to GREs and GRE half sites (GRE1/2s) that are part of a regulatory unit. A response unit allows a higher level of glucocorticoid induction than simple GREs and, in addition, allows the integration of tissue-specific information with the glucocorticoid response. Presumably, the complexity of such a glucocorticoid response unit (GRU) depends on the number of pathways that integrate at this unit. Because GRUs are often located at distant sites relative to the transcription-start site, the GRU has to find a way to communicate with the basal-transcription machinery. We propose that the activating signal of a distal enhancer can be relayed onto the transcription-initiation complex by coupling elements located proximal to the promoter

In vivo footprinting of the carbamoylphosphate synthetase I cAMP-response unit indicates important roles for FoxA and PKA in formation of the enhanceosome

The expression of carbamoylphosphate synthetase-I (CPS), the first and rate-determining enzyme of the urea cycle, is regulated at the transcriptional level by glucocorticoids and glucagon, the latter acting via cyclic AMP (cAMP). The hormonal response is mediated by a distal enhancer located 6.3 kb upstream of the transcription-start site. Within this enhancer, a cAMP-response unit (CRU) is responsible for mediating cAMP-dependent transcriptional activity. The CPS CRU contains binding sites for cAMP-response element (CRE)-binding protein (CRE-BP), forkhead box A (FoxA), CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP), and an unidentified protein P1. To gain insight in the protein-DNA interactions that activate the CPS CRU in living cells, we have employed in vivo footprinting assays. Comparison of the fibroblast cell line Rat-1 and the hepatoma cell lines FTO-2B and WT-8 showed that FoxA binds the CPS CRU constitutively in CPS-expressing cells only. Comparison of FTO-2B and WT-8 hepatoma cells, which only differ in cAMP responsiveness, demonstrated that the binding of the other transcription factors is dependent on cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) activity. Finally, we observed a footprint between the CRE and the P1-binding site in the in vivo footprint assay that was not detectable by in vitro footprint assays, implying a major change in CRU-associated chromatin conformation upon CRU activation. These findings indicate that activation of the CRU is initiated in a tissue-specific manner by the binding of FoxA. When cellular cAMP and glucocorticoid levels increase, CRE-BP becomes activated, allowing the binding of the remaining transcription factors and the transactivation of the CPS promote

Possible roles of DLK1 in the Notch pathway during development and disease

AbstractThe Delta-Notch pathway is an evolutionarily conserved signaling pathway which controls a broad range of developmental processes including cell fate determination, terminal differentiation and proliferation. In mammals, four Notch receptors (NOTCH1–4) and five activating canonical ligands (JAGGED1, JAGGED2, DLL1, DLL3 and DLL4) have been described. The precise function of noncanonical Notch ligands remains unclear. Delta-like 1 homolog (DLK1), the best studied noncanonical Notch ligand, has been shown to act as an inhibitor of Notch signaling in vitro, but its function in vivo is poorly understood. In this review we summarize Notch signaling during development and highlight recent studies in DLK1expression that reveal new insights into its function

The role of proximal-enhancer elements in the glucocorticoid regulation of carbamoylphosphate synthetase gene transcription from the upstream response unit

As part of the urea cycle, carbamoylphosphate synthetase (CPS) converts toxic ammonia resulting from amino-acid catabolism into urea. Liver-specific and glucocorticoid-dependent expression of the gene involves a distal enhancer, a promoter-proximal enhancer, and the minimal promoter itself. When challenged with glucocorticoids, the glucocorticoid-responsive unit (GRU) in the distal enhancer of the carbamoylphosphate-synthetase gene can only activate gene expression if, in addition to the minimal promoter, the proximal enhancer is present. Here, we identify and characterise two elements in the proximal CPS enhancer that are involved in glucocorticoid-dependent gene activation mediated by the GRU. A purine-rich stretch forming a so-called GAGA-box and a glucocorticoid-response element (GRE) are both crucial for the efficacy of the GRU and appear to constitute a promoter-proximal response unit that activates the promoter. The glucocorticoid response of the CPS gene is, therefore, dependent on the combined action of a distal and a promoter-proximal response unit

CyclicAMP and glucocorticoid responsiveness of the rat carbamoylphosphate synthetase gene requires the interplay of upstream regulatory units

Many genes involved in metabolic processes are regulated by glucocorticoids and/or cyclicAMP. The hepatic expression of the urea cycle enzyme carbamoylphosphate-synthetase-I gene (CPS) is regulated at the transcriptional level by both factors. Here, we report that the 5' half of the distal enhancer is necessary and sufficient for full cyclicAMP responsiveness. The cyclicAMP-responsive element (CRE), and FoxA- and C/EBP-binding sites are indispensible for cyclicAMP responsiveness, indicating that these elements make up a cyclicAMP-responsive unit (CRU). In addition to this CRU, the CPS regulatory regions contain two glucocorticoid-response elements (GRE): one in the 3' region of the distal enhancer and one in the proximal enhancer. In presence of the cyclicAMP-responsive region in the distal enhancer, only one of the GREs is required for glucocorticoid-inducible CPS expression, with both GREs acting in an additive fashion to fully confer the inducing effect of glucocorticoids. In contrast, the simultaneous presence of both GREs is required in the absence of the cyclicAMP-responsive region. In this configuration, the distal GRE fully depends on its neighbouring FoxA and C/EBP REs for activity and is, therefore, a glucocorticoid-responsive unit. In conclusion, we show here that the CPS CRU is a bifunctional unit that elicits the cyclicAMP response and, in addition, functions as a glucocorticoid accessory unit to establish a glucocorticoid response from otherwise silent proximal or distal GRUs. Therefore, cyclicAMP and glucocorticoid pathways can induce CPS transcription via overlapping sets of response element

Fibroblast growth factor 21 is induced by endoplasmic reticulum stress.

Increased hepatic expression is held responsible for elevated serum levels of fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) but the underlying molecular mechanism is unclear. In the present study we tested the postulate that the metabolic hormone FGF21 is regulated by endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, a condition that is observed in a number of diseases including NAFLD and results in activation of an adaptive response known as the unfolded protein response (UPR). ER stress stimuli were found to induce expression of Fgf21 mRNA in H4IIE hepatoma cells and in isolated rat hepatocytes. Moreover, intraperitoneal injection of the ER stressor tunicamycin induced hepatic Fgf21 expression in mice and resulted in marked elevation of serum FGF21 levels. The effect of ER stress on FGF21 expression could be mimicked by overexpression of ATF4, a transcriptional effector of the PERK-branch of the UPR. In silico analysis revealed the presence of two binding sites for ATF4 in the FGF21 promoter region. Combined disruption of these elements, abrogated FGF21 promoter activity induced by ER stress or ATF4 overexpression. These findings implicate the PERK/eIF2alpha/ATF4 cascade in ER stress regulation of FGF21. A consequence of this notion is that other intracellular stress signaling pathways that converge at eIF2alpha, can regulate FGF21 expression. Indeed, both nutrient (amino acid deprivation) and oxidative stress (arsenite) were found to induce Fgf21 expression in hepatoma cells and isolated rat hepatocytes. In conclusion, FGF21 expression is regulated by ER stress and additional intracellular stress signaling pathways. Our findings suggest that increased cellular stress in fatty livers may underlie the elevated FGF21 levels observed in patients with NAFL

Lipotoxicity and steatohepatitis in an overfed mouse model for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

The major risk factors for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) are obesity, insulin resistance and dyslipidemia. The cause for progression from the steatosis stage to the inflammatory condition (non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)) remains elusive at present. Aim of this study was to test whether the different stages of NAFLD as well as the associated metabolic abnormalities can be recreated in time in an overfed mouse model and study the mechanisms underlying the transition from steatosis to NASH. Male C57Bl/6J mice were subjected to continuous intragastric overfeeding with a high-fat liquid diet (HFLD) for different time periods. Mice fed a solid high-fat diet (HFD) ad libitum served as controls. Liver histology and metabolic characteristics of liver, white adipose tisue (WAT) and plasma were studied. Both HFD-fed and HFLD-overfed mice initially developed liver steatosis, but only the latter progressed in time to NASH. NASH coincided with obesity, hyperinsulinemia, loss of liver glycogen and hepatic endoplasmatic reticulum stress. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (Ppargamma), fibroblast growth factor 21 (Fgf21), fatty acid binding protein (Fabp) and fatty acid translocase (CD36) were induced exclusively in the livers of the HFLD-overfed mice. Inflammation, reduced adiponectin expression and altered expression of genes that influence adipogenic capacity were only observed in WAT of HFLD-overfed mice. In conclusion: this dietary mouse model displays the different stages and the metabolic settings often found in human NAFLD. Lipotoxicity due to compromised adipose tissue function is likely associated with the progression to NASH, but whether this is the cause or the consequence remains to be established