6 research outputs found

    Intervertebral test spacers and postfusion MRI artifacting: A comparative in vitro study of magnesium versus titanium and carbon fiber reinforced polymers as biomaterials

    No full text
    Intervertebral spacers are made of different materials, which can effect the postfusion magnetic imaging (MRI) scans. Susceptibility artifacts specially for metallic implants can decrease the image quality. This study aimed to determine whether magnesium as a lightweight and biocompatible metal is suitable as a biomaterial for spinal implants based on its MRI artifacting behavior. To compare artifacting behaviors, we implanted into one porcine cadaveric spine different test spacers made of magnesium, titanium and CFRP. All test spacers were scanned using 2 T1-TSE MRI sequences. The artifact dimensions were traced on all scans and statistically analyzed. The total artifact volume and median artifact area of the titanium spacers were statistically significantly larger than magnesium spacers (p 0.05). Our results suggest that spinal implants made with magnesium alloys will behave more like CFRP devices in MRI scans

    Implant detectibility of intervertebral disc spacers in post fusion MRI: evaluation of the MRI scan quality by using a scoring system - an in vitro study

    No full text
    Introduction Intervertebral spacers for anterior spine fusion are made of different materials, such as titanium and cobalt chromium alloys and carbon fiber-reinforced polymers. Implant-related susceptibility artifacts can decrease the quality of MRI scans. The aim of this cadaveric study was to demonstrate the extent that implant-related MRI artifacting affects the postfusion differentiation of determined regions of interest (ROIs). Methods In six cadaveric porcine spines, we evaluated the postimplantation MRI scans of a titanium, cobalt-chromium and carbon spacer that differed in shape and surface qualities. A spacer made of human cortical bone was used as a control. A defined evaluation unit was divided into ROIs to characterize the spinal canal as well as the intervertebral disc space. Considering 15 different MRI sequences read independently by an interobserver-validated team of specialists the artifact-affected image quality of the median MRI slice was rated on a score of 0-3. A maximum score of 18 points (100%) for the determined ROIs was possible. Results Turbo spin echo sequences produced the best scores for all spacers and the control. Only the control achieved a score of 100%. For the determined ROI maximum scores for the cobalt-chromium, titanium and carbon spacers were 24%, 32% and 84%, respectively. Conclusion By using favored T1 TSE sequences the carbon spacer showed a clear advantage in postfusion spinal imaging. Independent of artifact dimensions, the scoring system used allowed us to create an implant-related ranking of MRI scan quality in reference to the bone control

    Temporal Bone Imaging: Comparison of Flat Panel Volume CT and Multisection CT

    No full text
    BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A recent development in radiology is the use of flat panel detectors in CT to obtain higher-resolution images. This technique is known as flat panel volume CT (fpVCT). We sought to compare the image quality and diagnostic value of 2 different flat panel detector-equipped scanners: one is a prototype fpVCT scanner, and the other is a so-called flat panel digital volume tomography (fpDVT) scanner, which is routinely used in clinical setup with current state-of-the-art multisection CT (MSCT) scanners. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five explanted temporal bones and 2 whole-head cadaveric specimens were scanned with fpVCT, fpDVT, and MSCT scanners. The image series were blindly evaluated by 3 trained observers who rated 38 anatomic structures with regard to their delineation/appearance. RESULTS: Although the image quality obtained with fpVCT and fpDVT was rated significantly better compared with MSCT on isolated temporal bones, the differences were not significant when whole cadaveric heads were scanned. CONCLUSIONS: Theoretic and practical advantages exist for flat panel detector-equipped scanners, including improved image quality. However, when imaging whole cadaveric heads, no significant difference could be demonstrated between them and standard-of-care MSCT

    Volumetry of human molars with flat panel-based volume CT in vitro

    No full text
    Contains fulltext : 35137.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)The flat panel-based volume computed tomography (fpVCT) is a new CT device applicable for experimental, three-dimensional evaluation of teeth at a resolution of about 150 microm in the high contrast region. The aim of this study was to investigate whether fpVCT was suitable for quantification of the volumes of dental hard tissues and the root canal system to establish a new method for morphological studies. Fifty-two extracted third molars (maxillary: 31, mandibular: 21) were examined with a prototype of an fpVCT using a volumetry algorithm at different levels according to the radiographic density of enamel and dentine. Volumetry of the root canal system was performed after "region growing segmentation": starting from a voxel in the centre of the root canal, this algorithm searches voxels of same density in the surrounding. The volumetry of the root canal system was stopped by the investigator at the apical constriction. Results showed that dentine, enamel and root canal system could be well distinguished in three-dimensional images. Volumetry yielded the following data (cm(3), mean+/-SD): dentine 0.438+/-0.111, enamel 0.227+/-0.051, root canal system 0.052+/-0.017 and total volume 0.753+/-0.159. In conclusion, the fpVCT is appropriate for non-destructive volumetry of large numbers of teeth in experimental laboratory studies
    corecore