8 research outputs found

    High-dose melphalan with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia: results of a retrospective analysis of the Italian Pediatric Group for Bone Marrow Transplantation

    No full text
    This retrospective study from the Italian Association of Pediatric Hematology Oncology-Bone Marrow Transplant Group (AIEOP-TMO) reports the results of consolidation with high-dose melphalan and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1). From October 1994 to July 1999, 20 patients (median age 9.9 years, range 0.11-16.2) were treated in six centers. Eighteen had de novo AML and two had secondary AML. According to BFM criteria, 10 were classified as standard- and 10 as high-risk patients, respectively. The median time from diagnosis to CR1 and from diagnosis to Auto-HSCT were 1.1 months (range 0.8-1.6) and 4.3 months (range 3.1-6.2), respectively. Purging with either mafosfamide (three) or in vivo interleukin-2 (four) was performed in seven of 20 patients. Melphalan was administered at a dosage of 150-220 mg/m(2) (median 180). Median total number of nucleated cells infused was 2.5 x 10(8)/kg (range 1.1-8.9). The myeloablative regimen was well tolerated with no toxic death, veno-occlusive disease or life-threatening complications. All patients had hematopoietic recovery in a median time of 27 days for neutrophils and 44 days for platelets. Eight of 20 patients relapsed after a median time of 7.2 months from transplant (range 5.7-15.9). Six of them died (five of progression of disease and one of sepsis) while the remaining two patients are alive in CR2. The 3-year cumulative probability of survival and event-free-survival (EFS) is 62% and 56%, respectively. This study showed that in pediatric patients with AML consolidation of CR1 with high-dose melphalan allows survival and EFS to be obtained comparable to other auto-HSCT or chemotherapy published series with a potential sparing effect both on duration of treatment (with respect to chemotherapy) and on long-term side-effects (with respect to auto-HSCT with TBI or busulfan containing regimens)

    Autologous bone marrow transplantation for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia in remission: first choice for isolated extramedullary relapse?

    No full text
    Between May 1984 and May 1992, 75 children 3-19 (median 9) years of age underwent autologous marrow transplant. Clinical data were obtained from the BMT Registry of the AIEOP (Italian Association of Pediatric Hemato/Oncology). Fifty-six children were transplanted after marrow +/- other site(s) relapse and 19 after an isolated extramedullary relapse. The transplant preparative regimens varied according to the center performing the transplant. Seven patients (9%) died of transplant-related complications. Forty-four (58.6%) of 75 patients relapsed again following autologous BMT. The 5-year DFS was 27.8%. An isolated extramedullary relapse was the only variable that statistically influenced DFS. In this retrospective study, autologous BMT for patients with ALL in second CR following marrow relapse did not offer an encouraging result (13% probability of DFS at 5 years), whereas autologous BMT following an (early) isolated extramedullary relapse resulted in nearly 70% DFS. Autologous BMT may be appropriate for this latter group of patients

    Treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia in second remission with allogeneic bone marrow transplantation and chemotherapy: 10-year GITMO/AIEOP experience

    No full text
    To compare the results of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (AlloBMT) with those obtained with chemotherapy (CHEMO) in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in second complete remission (CR) after a marrow relapse. The experience of the Italian Bone Marrow Transplantation Group and the Italian Pediatric Hematology Oncology Association is summarized. All children who had a relapse in the period 1980 to 1989 in 27 centers in Italy were eligible for the study. Of 287 eligible patients, 230 were treated with CHEMO, most of them (93%) according to a standard multiple-drug relapse protocol. The remaining 57 children underwent AlloBMT. Preparative regimens included total-body irradiation and chemotherapy (n = 51) or chemotherapy alone (n = 6). Statistical analysis was performed with a Cox regression model adjusting for waiting time to transplant and prognostic factors. In the whole series, minimum and median follow-up after second CR were 3 and 6.2 years, respectively; at 8 years from second CR, disease-free survival (DFS) was 20.0% (SE 2.5) and survival was 26.4% (SE 2.9). In the group of patients with an early first relapse, DFS was significantly longer after AlloBMT than after CHEMO (relative risk [RR] = 0.45, P = .002). No significant advantage of AlloBMT over CHEMO was found for patients with a late relapse (> 30 months since diagnosis). Duration of first CR significantly influenced prognosis in the CHEMO group (RR = 0.32, P = .0001 for patients with late first relapse versus patients with early first relapse). Results suggest an advantage in DFS of AlloBMT over CHEMO in ALL patients who experienced an early first medullary relapse. Prospective trials are needed to address efficacy of AlloBMT versus CHEMO in patients with late bone marrow relapse

    Autologous bone marrow transplantation for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia in Italy. AIEOP/FONOP TMO Group

    No full text
    From January 1984 to December 1994, ABMT was performed on 154 children (101 males, 53 females; median age 10, range 3-21 years) with ALL and registered for BMT by the AIEOP (Italian Association of Paediatric Haemato-Oncology). All patients were in CR: 98 were in 2nd CR and 56 were in >2nd CR. Fifteen children (9.7%) died of transplant-related mortality. Ninety-five patients (61.6%) relapsed at a median of 5 (range 1-42) months after ABMT. The 8-year EFS according to pre-BMT status was 34.6% (s.e. 4.9) for 2nd CR patients and 10.6% (s.e. 5.6) for patients in >2nd CR. By univariate analysis, site of relapse (isolated extramedullary (IE) vs BM: EFS = 68.5% vs 18.2%; P 2nd CR. By multivariate analysis, site of relapse was the only significant factor in 2nd CR patients (P < 0.0001). In conclusion, ABMT is an effective treatment after one early IE relapse. Few patients can be rescued after BM relapse
    corecore