Dietary protein safety and resistance exercise: what do we really know?

Resistance trainers continue to receive mixed messages about the safety of purposely seeking ample dietary protein in their quest for stimulating protein synthesis, improving performance, or maintaining health. Despite protein's lay popularity and the routinely high intakes exhibited by strength athletes, liberal and purposeful protein consumption is often maligned by "experts". University textbooks, instructors, and various forms of literature from personal training groups and athletic organizations continue to use dissuasive language surrounding dietary protein. Due to the widely known health benefits of dietary protein and a growing body of evidence on its safety profile, this is unfortunate. In response, researchers have critiqued unfounded educational messages. As a recent summarizing example, the International Society of Sports Nutrition (ISSN) Position Stand: Protein and Exercise reviewed general literature on renal and bone health. The concluding remark that "Concerns that protein intake within this range [1.4 – 2.0 g/kg body weight per day] is unhealthy are unfounded in healthy, exercising individuals." was based largely upon data from non-athletes due to "a lack of scientific evidence". Future studies were deemed necessary. This assessment is not unique in the scientific literature. Investigators continue to cite controversy, debate, and the lack of direct evidence that allows it. This review discusses the few existing safety studies done specific to athletes and calls for protein research specific to resistance trainers. Population-specific, long term data will be necessary for effective education in dietetics textbooks and from sports governing bodies

Dysregulated Nephrin in Diabetic Nephropathy of Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross Sectional Study

Podocyte specific proteins are dysregulated in diabetic nephropathy, though the extent of their expression loss is not identical and may be subject to different regulatory factors. Quantifying the degree of loss may help identify the most useful protein to use as an early biomarker of diabetic nephropathy.Protein expression of synaptopodin, podocin and nephrin were quantified in 15 Type 2 diabetic renal biopsies and 12 control patients. We found statistically significant downregulation of synaptopodin (P<0.0001), podocin (P = 0.0002), and nephrin (P<0.0001) in kidney biopsies of diabetic nephropathy as compared with controls. Urinary nephrin levels (nephrinuria) were then measured in 66 patients with Type 2 diabetes and 10 healthy controls by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Exocell, Philadelphia, PA). When divided into groups according to normo-, micro-, and macroalbuminuria, nephrinuria was found to be present in 100% of diabetic patients with micro- and macroalbuminuria, as well as 54% of patients with normoalbuminuria. Nephrinuria also correlated significantly with albuminuria (rho = 0.89, p<0.001), systolic blood pressure (rho = 0.32, p = 0.007), and correlated negatively with serum albumin (rho = -0.48, p<0.0001) and eGFR (rho = -0.33, p = 0.005).These data suggest that key podocyte-specific protein expressions are significantly and differentially downregulated in diabetic nephropathy. The finding that nephrinuria is observed in a majority of these normoalbuminuric patients demonstrates that it may precede microalbuminuria. If further research confirms nephrinuria to be a biomarker of pre-clinical diabetic nephropathy, it would shed light on podocyte metabolism in disease, and raise the possibility of new and earlier therapeutic targets

The nerve stimulation technique versus the loss of resistance technique for the posterior approach to lumbar plexus block: a randomized, prospective, observer-blinded, pilot study

BACKGROUND: This prospective, randomized, observer-blinded, pilot study compares the effects of the nerve stimulation guidance technique (NS) with the loss of resistance technique (LOR) on readiness for surgery during the posterior approach to lumbar plexus block. METHODS: Thirty ASA status I-III patients who were 18-85 years old and who were undergoing hip fracture repair were enrolled. After parasacral sciatic nerve block, patients were randomly allocated to receive a continuous posterior lumbar plexus block using nerve stimulation (n=15) or a continuous psoas compartment block using the loss of resistance technique (n=15) with 20 ml of 1.5% mepivacaine. A blinded observer monitored for sensory and motor block onsets every 5 minutes. We defined readiness for surgery as complete numbness to the pinprick test and complete motor block on the surgical side. If incomplete, the lumbar plexus block was supplemented with 10 mL of 1.5% mepivacaine through the catheter before surgery. Intraoperative fentanyl or general anesthesia requirements, pain scores, local anesthetic consumption, morphine requirements for breakthrough pain and side effects were monitored. RESULTS: The mean time to readiness for surgery was 12\ub16 min Group NS and 22\ub16 min in Group LOR (P=0.03). Three patients in Group NS and 9 patients in Group LOR required additional boluses of local anesthetic through the lumbar plexus catheter before surgery (P=0.113). CONCLUSION: Nerve stimulation allowed faster readiness for surgery than loss of resistance. Nevertheless, the two techniques seem to be comparable in terms of local anesthetic consumption, morphine requirements and pain scores