Caries Phenotype Determination.

<p>Quantitative Light fluorescence (QLF) of occlusal surfaces of C-F and C-A subjects. <u>Quantitative light fluorescence </u>(QLF) examination was conducted to complement clinical examinations and the DIFOTI procedure. C-A subjects had an average of 12 (range = 6–17) decayed tooth surfaces whereas C-F subjects presented with a decay component = 0. Subjects had an average of 11.5 decayed surfaces and 2.3 restored surfaces. These individuals presented with primary dentition only. C-A subjects had an average of 74 healthy surfaces.</p

Comparison of C-F and C-A Species Abundance.

<p>The 16 most abundant species and their relative abundance in C-F and C-A subject pools.</p

Differential Representation of Genera in the C-F and C-A Microbiomes.

<p>Bars to the left correspond to over-representation of genera in the C-F subject pool, and bars to the right correspond to over-representation in the C-A subject pool. Bar color key references percentage of the total 16S sequences.</p

Statistical Significance of Differential Species Abundance Between the C-F and C-A Microbiomes.

<p>Volcano plot depicting the relationship between –log p-values resulting from standard binomial tests of frequency differences between C-A and C-F for each phylotype identified as a function of the standardized difference in phylotype frequency between C-A and C-F.</p

Overview of Carbapenemase-producing Genotypes in the Health and Surveillance Systems of the U.S. Department of Defense.

<p>Overview of Carbapenemase-producing Genotypes in the Health and Surveillance Systems of the U.S. Department of Defense.</p

Considerations and Challenges of Implementing Next Generation Sequencing Across Large Health Systems.

<p>Considerations and Challenges of Implementing Next Generation Sequencing Across Large Health Systems.</p

Phylogeny of Carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella and Carbapenemase-producing Acinetobacter.

<p>A-C represent the same <i>Klebsiella</i> isolates from the same outbreak event, and Fig 2D–2F represent the same <i>Acinetobacter</i> isolates from a separate same outbreak event. However, depending on the clustering method and software program used, different results can be obtained. This highlights the need for standardized approaches.</p