Molecular heterogeneity of prostate cancer bone metastasis

Castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) develops after androgen deprivation therapy of advanced PC, often with metastatic growth in bone. Patients with metastatic CRPC have very poor prognosis. Growth of CRPC, in most but not all patients, seems to involve androgen receptor (AR) activity, despite castrate levels of serum testosterone. Multiple mechanisms behind AR activation in castrated patients have been described, such as AR amplification, AR mutations, expression of constitutively active AR variants, and intra-tumoral steroid synthesis. However, other mechanisms beside AR activation are also involved and CRPC patients with tumors circumventing the need for AR stimulation will probably not benefit from AR targeting therapies but will need alternative treatments. Available treatments for CRPC are chemotherapy, AR antagonists or inhibition of androgen-synthesis. Novel drugs are constantly under development and several new therapies has recently been approved for clinical use. These include, in addition to new AR targeting therapies also immunotherapy, osteoclast inhibitors and bone-targeting radiopharmaceuticals. Due to heterogeneous mechanisms behind CRPC and that newly developed therapies are based on different mechanisms of action, there are reasons to believe that CRPC patients show different therapy responses due to diverse molecular properties of individual tumors. Although there are promising prospects, no biomarkers are used today for patient stratification into different treatments. Another important aspect is that, when effective, any therapy will probably induce tumor responses that subsequently cause further molecular diversities and alternative paths for development of tumor relapse and castration-resistance. Such mechanisms are important to understand in order to develop new treatment strategies. In this thesis, global gene expression and methylation patterns were studied in bone metastases obtained from PC patients going through metastasis surgery for spinal cord compression. Gene expression patterns were analyzed by multivariate statistics and ontology analysis with the aim to identify subgroups of biological/pathological relevance. Interesting findings from array analysis were verified using qRT-PCR and immunohistochemical analysis. In addition, a xenograft mouse model was used to study the effects of abiraterone (steroidogenesis inhibitor) and cabazitaxel (taxane), and subsequently developed resistance mechanisms in the 22Rv1 PC cell line expressing high levels of AR-V7; a constitutively active AR splice variant associated with a poor prognosis and resistance to AR targeting therapies. In summary, results showed that the majority of CRPC bone metastases were AR-driven, defined from high levels of AR-regulated gene transcripts, while a smaller sub-group was non-AR-driven (paper I). AR-driven bone metastases had high metabolic activity in combination with downregulated immune responses while non-AR-driven cases had a more pronounced immune response (paper I) and higher bone cell activity (paper II). Paper III identified pronounced hypermethylation in primary prostate tumors probably causing a suppressed anti-tumor immune-response whereas metastases showed a different methylation pattern related to increased AR activity and patient outcome. In paper IV, 22Rv1 xenografts showed poor response to abiraterone and initially excellent response to cabazitaxel, but eventually resistance occurred probably due to an upregulation of the ABCB1 transporter protein. Anti-androgens partly reversed the resistance. In conclusion, we have identified molecular heterogeneities in clinical bone metastases associated with biological characteristics, which could perhaps be used both for stratifying patients into treatment modalities, and to aid in further development of effective therapies for CRPC

Molecular heterogeneity of prostate cancer bone metastasis

Castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) develops after androgen deprivation therapy of advanced PC, often with metastatic growth in bone. Patients with metastatic CRPC have very poor prognosis. Growth of CRPC, in most but not all patients, seems to involve androgen receptor (AR) activity, despite castrate levels of serum testosterone. Multiple mechanisms behind AR activation in castrated patients have been described, such as AR amplification, AR mutations, expression of constitutively active AR variants, and intra-tumoral steroid synthesis. However, other mechanisms beside AR activation are also involved and CRPC patients with tumors circumventing the need for AR stimulation will probably not benefit from AR targeting therapies but will need alternative treatments. Available treatments for CRPC are chemotherapy, AR antagonists or inhibition of androgen-synthesis. Novel drugs are constantly under development and several new therapies has recently been approved for clinical use. These include, in addition to new AR targeting therapies also immunotherapy, osteoclast inhibitors and bone-targeting radiopharmaceuticals. Due to heterogeneous mechanisms behind CRPC and that newly developed therapies are based on different mechanisms of action, there are reasons to believe that CRPC patients show different therapy responses due to diverse molecular properties of individual tumors. Although there are promising prospects, no biomarkers are used today for patient stratification into different treatments. Another important aspect is that, when effective, any therapy will probably induce tumor responses that subsequently cause further molecular diversities and alternative paths for development of tumor relapse and castration-resistance. Such mechanisms are important to understand in order to develop new treatment strategies. In this thesis, global gene expression and methylation patterns were studied in bone metastases obtained from PC patients going through metastasis surgery for spinal cord compression. Gene expression patterns were analyzed by multivariate statistics and ontology analysis with the aim to identify subgroups of biological/pathological relevance. Interesting findings from array analysis were verified using qRT-PCR and immunohistochemical analysis. In addition, a xenograft mouse model was used to study the effects of abiraterone (steroidogenesis inhibitor) and cabazitaxel (taxane), and subsequently developed resistance mechanisms in the 22Rv1 PC cell line expressing high levels of AR-V7; a constitutively active AR splice variant associated with a poor prognosis and resistance to AR targeting therapies. In summary, results showed that the majority of CRPC bone metastases were AR-driven, defined from high levels of AR-regulated gene transcripts, while a smaller sub-group was non-AR-driven (paper I). AR-driven bone metastases had high metabolic activity in combination with downregulated immune responses while non-AR-driven cases had a more pronounced immune response (paper I) and higher bone cell activity (paper II). Paper III identified pronounced hypermethylation in primary prostate tumors probably causing a suppressed anti-tumor immune-response whereas metastases showed a different methylation pattern related to increased AR activity and patient outcome. In paper IV, 22Rv1 xenografts showed poor response to abiraterone and initially excellent response to cabazitaxel, but eventually resistance occurred probably due to an upregulation of the ABCB1 transporter protein. Anti-androgens partly reversed the resistance. In conclusion, we have identified molecular heterogeneities in clinical bone metastases associated with biological characteristics, which could perhaps be used both for stratifying patients into treatment modalities, and to aid in further development of effective therapies for CRPC

Molecular heterogeneity of prostate cancer bone metastasis

Castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) develops after androgen deprivation therapy of advanced PC, often with metastatic growth in bone. Patients with metastatic CRPC have very poor prognosis. Growth of CRPC, in most but not all patients, seems to involve androgen receptor (AR) activity, despite castrate levels of serum testosterone. Multiple mechanisms behind AR activation in castrated patients have been described, such as AR amplification, AR mutations, expression of constitutively active AR variants, and intra-tumoral steroid synthesis. However, other mechanisms beside AR activation are also involved and CRPC patients with tumors circumventing the need for AR stimulation will probably not benefit from AR targeting therapies but will need alternative treatments. Available treatments for CRPC are chemotherapy, AR antagonists or inhibition of androgen-synthesis. Novel drugs are constantly under development and several new therapies has recently been approved for clinical use. These include, in addition to new AR targeting therapies also immunotherapy, osteoclast inhibitors and bone-targeting radiopharmaceuticals. Due to heterogeneous mechanisms behind CRPC and that newly developed therapies are based on different mechanisms of action, there are reasons to believe that CRPC patients show different therapy responses due to diverse molecular properties of individual tumors. Although there are promising prospects, no biomarkers are used today for patient stratification into different treatments. Another important aspect is that, when effective, any therapy will probably induce tumor responses that subsequently cause further molecular diversities and alternative paths for development of tumor relapse and castration-resistance. Such mechanisms are important to understand in order to develop new treatment strategies. In this thesis, global gene expression and methylation patterns were studied in bone metastases obtained from PC patients going through metastasis surgery for spinal cord compression. Gene expression patterns were analyzed by multivariate statistics and ontology analysis with the aim to identify subgroups of biological/pathological relevance. Interesting findings from array analysis were verified using qRT-PCR and immunohistochemical analysis. In addition, a xenograft mouse model was used to study the effects of abiraterone (steroidogenesis inhibitor) and cabazitaxel (taxane), and subsequently developed resistance mechanisms in the 22Rv1 PC cell line expressing high levels of AR-V7; a constitutively active AR splice variant associated with a poor prognosis and resistance to AR targeting therapies. In summary, results showed that the majority of CRPC bone metastases were AR-driven, defined from high levels of AR-regulated gene transcripts, while a smaller sub-group was non-AR-driven (paper I). AR-driven bone metastases had high metabolic activity in combination with downregulated immune responses while non-AR-driven cases had a more pronounced immune response (paper I) and higher bone cell activity (paper II). Paper III identified pronounced hypermethylation in primary prostate tumors probably causing a suppressed anti-tumor immune-response whereas metastases showed a different methylation pattern related to increased AR activity and patient outcome. In paper IV, 22Rv1 xenografts showed poor response to abiraterone and initially excellent response to cabazitaxel, but eventually resistance occurred probably due to an upregulation of the ABCB1 transporter protein. Anti-androgens partly reversed the resistance. In conclusion, we have identified molecular heterogeneities in clinical bone metastases associated with biological characteristics, which could perhaps be used both for stratifying patients into treatment modalities, and to aid in further development of effective therapies for CRPC

Klk4t2 is a hormonally regulated transcript from the klk4 locus

The human kallikrein-related peptidase 4 (KLK4) and the transcribed pseudogene KLKP1 are reported to be highly expressed in the prostate. When trying to clone transcripts of KLKP1, we partly failed. Instead, we identified an androgen-regulated transcript, KLK4T2, which appeared to be a splice variant of KLK4 that also contained exons of KLKP1. Expression analysis of KLK4, KLK4T2, and KLKP1 transcripts in prostate cancer cell lines showed high levels of KLKP1 transcripts in the nucleus and in unfractionated cell extract, whereas it was almost completely absent in the cytoplasmatic fraction. This was in contrast to KLK4 and KLK4T2, which displayed high to mod-erate levels in the cytoplasm. In patient cohorts we found significantly higher expression of both KLK4T2 and KLK4 in benign prostatic hyperplasia compared to both primary prostate cancer and bone metastasis. Analysis of tissue panels demonstrated the highest expression of KLK4T2 in the prostate, but in contrast to the classical KLK4, relatively high levels were also found in placenta. So far, the function of KLK4T2 is still to be explored, but the structure of the translation product indicated that it generates a 17.4 kDa intracellular protein with possible regulatory function

Inhibition of the insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor potentiates acute effects of castration in a rat model for prostate cancer growth in bone

Prostate cancer (PCa) patients with bone metastases are primarily treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Less pronounced ADT effects are seen in metastases than in primary tumors. To test if acute effects of ADT was enhanced by concurrent inhibition of pro-survival insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), rats were inoculated with Dunning R3327-G tumor cells into the tibial bone marrow cavity and established tumors were treated with castration in combination with IGF-1 receptor (IGF-1R) inhibitor NVP-AEW541, or by each treatment alone. Dunning R3327-G cells were stimulated by androgens and IGF-1 in vitro. In rat tibia, Dunning R3327-G cells induced bone remodeling, identified through increased immunoreactivity of osteoblast and osteoclast markers. Tumor cells occasionally grew outside the tibia, and proliferation and apoptotic rates a few days after treatment were evaluated by scoring BrdU- and caspase-3-positive tumor cells inside and outside the bone marrow cavity, separately. Apoptosis was significantly induced outside, but unaffected inside, the tibial bone by either castration or NVP-AEW541, and the maximum increase (2.7-fold) was obtained by the combined treatment. Proliferation was significantly reduced by NVP-AEW541, independently of growth site, although the maximum decrease (24%) was observed when NVP-AEW541 was combined with castration. Tumor cell IGF-1R immunoreactivity was evaluated in clinical PCa bone metastases (n = 61), and positive staining was observed in most cases (74%). In conclusion, IGF-1R inhibition may be evaluated in combination with ADT in patients with metastatic PCa, or in combination with therapies for the subsequent development of castration-resistant disease, although diverse responses could be anticipated depending on metastasis site.Special Issue.Originally published in thesis in manuscript form.</p

Subgroups of castration-resistant prostate cancer bone metastases defined through an inverse relationship between androgen receptor activity and immune response

Background: Novel therapies for men with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) are needed, particularly for cancers not driven by androgen receptor (AR) activation. Objectives: To identify molecular subgroups of PC bone metastases of relevance for therapy. Design, setting, and participants: Fresh-frozen bone metastasis samples from men with CRPC (n = 40), treatment-naïve PC (n = 8), or other malignancies (n = 12) were characterized using whole-genome expression profiling, multivariate principal component analysis (PCA), and functional enrichment analysis. Expression profiles were verified by reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in an extended set of bone metastases (n = 77) and compared to levels in malignant and adjacent benign prostate tissue from patients with localized disease (n = 12). Selected proteins were evaluated using immunohistochemistry. A cohort of PC patients (n = 284) diagnosed at transurethral resection with long follow-up was used for prognostic evaluation. Results and limitations: The majority of CRPC bone metastases (80%) was defined as AR-driven based on PCA analysis and high expression of the AR, AR co-regulators (FOXA1, HOXB13), and AR-regulated genes (KLK2, KLK3, NKX3.1, STEAP2, TMPRSS2); 20% were non–AR-driven. Functional enrichment analysis indicated high metabolic activity and low immune responses in AR-driven metastases. Accordingly, infiltration of CD3+ and CD68+ cells was lower in AR-driven than in non–AR-driven metastases, and tumor cell HLA class I ABC immunoreactivity was inversely correlated with nuclear AR immunoreactivity. RT-PCR analysis showed low MHC class I expression (HLA-A, TAP1, and PSMB9 mRNA) in PC bone metastases compared to benign and malignant prostate tissue and bone metastases of other origins. In primary PC, low HLA class I ABC immunoreactivity was associated with high Gleason score, bone metastasis, and short cancer-specific survival. Limitations include the limited number of patients studied and the single metastasis sample studied per patient. Conclusions: Most CRPC bone metastases show high AR and metabolic activities and low immune responses. A subgroup instead shows low AR and metabolic activities, but high immune responses. Targeted therapy for these groups should be explored. Patient summary: We studied heterogeneities at a molecular level in bone metastasis samples obtained from men with castration-resistant prostate cancer. We found differences of possible importance for therapy selection in individual patients

Marked response to cabazitaxel in prostate cancer xenografts expressing androgen receptor variant 7 and reversion of acquired resistance by anti-androgens

Background: Taxane treatment may be a suitable therapeutic option for patients with castration‐resistant prostate cancer and high expression of constitutively active androgen receptor variants (AR‐Vs). The aim of the study was to compare the effects of cabazitaxel and androgen deprivation treatments in a prostate tumor xenograft model expressing high levels of constitutively active AR‐V7. Furthermore, mechanisms behind acquired cabazitaxel resistance were explored. Methods: Mice were subcutaneously inoculated with 22Rv1 cells and treated with surgical castration (n = 7), abiraterone (n = 9), cabazitaxel (n = 6), castration plus abiraterone (n = 8), castration plus cabazitaxel (n = 11), or vehicle and/or sham operation (n = 23). Tumor growth was followed for about 2 months or to a volume of approximately 1000 mm3. Two cabazitaxel resistant cell lines; 22Rv1‐CabR1 and 22Rv1‐CabR2, were established from xenografts relapsing during cabazitaxel treatment. Differential gene expression between the cabazitaxel resistant and control 22Rv1 cells was examined by whole‐genome expression array analysis followed by immunoblotting, immunohistochemistry, and functional pathway analysis. Results: Abiraterone treatment alone or in combination with surgical castration had no major effect on 22Rv1 tumor growth, while cabazitaxel significantly delayed and in some cases totally abolished 22Rv1 tumor growth on its own and in combination with surgical castration. The cabazitaxel resistant cell lines; 22Rv1‐CabR1 and 22Rv1‐CabR2, both showed upregulation of the ATP‐binding cassette sub‐family B member 1 (ABCB1) efflux pump. Treatment with ABCB1 inhibitor elacridar completely restored susceptibility to cabazitaxel, while treatment with AR‐antagonists bicalutamide and enzalutamide partly restored susceptibility to cabazitaxel in both cell lines. The cholesterol biosynthesis pathway was induced in the 22Rv1‐CabR2 cell line, which was confirmed by reduced sensitivity to simvastatin treatment. Conclusions: Cabazitaxel efficiently inhibits prostate cancer growth despite the high expression of constitutively active AR‐V7. Acquired cabazitaxel resistance involving overexpression of efflux transporter ABCB1 can be reverted by bicalutamide or enzalutamide treatment, indicating the great clinical potential for combined treatment with cabazitaxel and anti‐androgens

Bone Cell Activity in Clinical Prostate Cancer Bone Metastasis and Its Inverse Relation to Tumor Cell Androgen Receptor Activity

Advanced prostate cancer frequently metastasizes to bone and induces a mixed osteoblastic/osteolytic bone response. Standard treatment for metastatic prostate cancer is androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) that also affects bone biology. Treatment options for patients relapsing after ADT are limited, particularly in cases where castration-resistance does not depend on androgen receptor (AR) activity. Patients with non-AR driven metastases may, however, benefit from therapies targeting the tumor microenvironment. Therefore, the current study specifically investigated bone cell activity in clinical bone metastases in relation to tumor cell AR activity, in order to gain novel insight into biological heterogeneities of possible importance for patient stratification into bone-targeting therapies. Metastasis tissue obtained from treatment-na&iuml;ve (n = 11) and castration-resistant (n = 28) patients was characterized using whole-genome expression analysis followed by multivariate modeling, functional enrichment analysis, and histological evaluation. Bone cell activity was analyzed by measuring expression levels of predefined marker genes representing osteoclasts (ACP5, CTSK, MMP9), osteoblasts (ALPL, BGLAP, RUNX2) and osteocytes (SOST). Principal component analysis indicated a positive correlation between osteoblast and osteoclast activity and a high variability in bone cell activity between different metastases. Immunohistochemistry verified a positive correlation between runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2) positive osteoblasts and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP, encoded by ACP5) positive osteoclasts lining the metastatic bone surface. No difference in bone cell activity was seen between treatment-na&iuml;ve and castration-resistant patients. Importantly, bone cell activity was inversely correlated to tumor cell AR activity (measured as AR, FOXA1, HOXB13, KLK2, KLK3, NKX3-1, STEAP2, and TMPRSS2 expression) and to patient serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. Functional enrichment analysis indicated high bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling in metastases with high bone cell activity and low tumor cell AR activity. This was confirmed by BMP4 immunoreactivity in tumor cells of metastases with ongoing bone formation, as determined by histological evaluation of van Gieson-stained sections. In conclusion, the inverse relation observed between bone cell activity and tumor cell AR activity in prostate cancer bone metastasis may be of importance for patient response to AR and/or bone targeting therapies, but needs to be evaluated in clinical settings in relation to serum markers for bone remodeling, radiography and patient response to therapy. The importance of BMP signaling in the development of sclerotic metastasis lesions deserves further exploration

A novel DNA methylation signature is associated with androgen receptor activity and patient prognosis in bone metastatic prostate cancer

Background: Patients with metastatic prostate cancer (PC) are treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) that initially reduces metastasis growth, but after some time lethal castration-resistant PC (CRPC) develops. A better understanding of the tumor biology in bone metastases is needed to guide further treatment developments. Subgroups of PC bone metastases based on transcriptome profiling have been previously identified by our research team, and specifically, heterogeneities related to androgen receptor (AR) activity have been described. Epigenetic alterations during PC progression remain elusive and this study aims to explore promoter gene methylation signatures in relation to gene expression and tumor AR activity. Materials and methods: Genome-wide promoter-associated CpG methylation signatures of a total of 94 tumor samples, including paired non-malignant and malignant primary tumor areas originating from radical prostatectomy samples (n = 12), and bone metastasis samples of separate patients with hormone-naive (n = 14), short-term castrated (n = 4) or CRPC (n = 52) disease were analyzed using the Infinium Methylation EPIC arrays, along with gene expression analysis by Illumina Bead Chip arrays (n = 90). AR activity was defined from expression levels of genes associated with canonical AR activity. Results: Integrated epigenome and transcriptome analysis identified pronounced hypermethylation in malignant compared to non-malignant areas of localized prostate tumors. Metastases showed an overall hypomethylation in relation to primary PC, including CpGs in the AR promoter accompanied with induction of AR mRNA levels. We identified a Methylation Classifier for Androgen receptor activity (MCA) signature, which separated metastases into two clusters (MCA positive/negative) related to tumor characteristics and patient prognosis. The MCA positive metastases showed low methylation levels of genes associated with canonical AR signaling and patients had a more favorable prognosis after ADT. In contrast, MCA negative patients had low AR activity associated with hypermethylation of AR-associated genes, and a worse prognosis after ADT. Conclusions: A promoter methylation signature classifies PC bone metastases into two groups and predicts tumor AR activity and patient prognosis after ADT. The explanation for the methylation diversities observed during PC progression and their biological and clinical relevance need further exploration