Added value of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for the detection of bone metastases in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer and a previous 99mTc bone scintigraphy

PURPOSE To investigate the added value and diagnostic accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT versus bone scintigraphy (BS) for bone metastasis detection at the primary staging of prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS Inclusion criteria involved consecutive patients with newly diagnosed intermediate- to high-risk PCa, who had undergone BS, mostly with supplementary SPECT/low-dose CT, and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT within less than 3 months without therapy initiation between the two investigations. BS was evaluated according to clinical routine and reported as no bone metastases (M0), bone metastases (M1), or equivocal (Me). The 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT was blindly evaluated by three specialists as M0, M1, or Me at the patient level. Sensitivity analyses were conducted using a "best valuable comparator" using all available imaging and clinical follow-up as a reference. RESULTS In total, 112 patients were included; 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT showed a sensitivity of 1.00, specificity of 0.93-0.96, positive predictive value of 0.74-0.81, and negative predictive value of 1.00. 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT revealed bone metastases in 8 of 81 patients with M0 disease according to BS. 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT confirmed the presence of bone metastases in all patients (n = 9) with M1 disease according to BS. In patients with Me by BS, 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT provided a definite result in 20 of 22 patients. 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT resulted in a false-positive answer in four patients with solitary rib lesions. CONCLUSION 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT revealed bone metastases in 10% of patients without bone metastases on BS and in 36% patients with indeterminate BS. However, solitary PSMA-avid lesions in the ribs should be interpreted cautiously as they may represent false-positive findings

Three-minute SPECT/CT is sufficient for the assessment of bone metastasis as add-on to planar bone scintigraphy: prospective head-to-head comparison to 11-min SPECT/CT

Background: The aim of this study is to assess whether ultra-fast acquisition SPECT/CT (UF-SPECT/CT) can replace standard SPECT/CT (std-SPECT/CT) as “add-on” to whole-body bone scintigraphy (WB-BS) for the investigation of bone metastases. Consecutive cancer patients referred for WB-BS who underwent SPECT/CT in addition to WB-BS were included. Std-SPECT, UF-SPECT, and low-dose CT were performed (std-SPECT: matrix 128 × 128, zoom factor 1, 20 s/view, 32 views; UF-SPECT: identical parameters except for 10 s/view and 16 views, reducing the acquisition time from 11 to 3 min). A consensus diagnosis was reached by two observers for each set of images (WB-BS + standard SPECT/CT or WB-BS + UF-SPECT/CT) using a three-category evaluation scale: M0: no bone metastases; M1: bone metastases; and Me: equivocal findings. Results: Among the 104 included patients, most presented with prostate cancer (n = 71) or breast cancer (n = 28). Using WB-BS + std-SPECT/CT, 71 (68%) patients were classified as M0, 19 (18%) as M1, and 14 (14%) as Me. Excellent agreement was observed between WB-BS + std-SPECT/CT and WB-BS + UF-SPECT/CT using the three-category scale: kappa = 0.91 (95% CI 0.84–0.97). No difference in observer agreement between cancer types was detected. SPECT/CT provided a definitive classification in 90 of 104 cases in which WB-BS was not entirely diagnostic. Conclusions: To investigate potential bone metastases, UF-SPECT/CT can be conducted as add-on to WB-BS to notably reduce the SPECT acquisition time without compromising diagnostic confidence.Fil: Zacho, Helle D.. Aalborg University Hospital; DinamarcaFil: Biurrun Manresa, José Alberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Entre Ríos. Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Entre Ríos; Argentina. Aalborg University Hospital; DinamarcaFil: Aleksyniene, Ramune. Aalborg University Hospital; DinamarcaFil: Ejlersen, June A.. Regional Hospital West Jutland; DinamarcaFil: Fledelius, Joan. Regional Hospital West Jutland; DinamarcaFil: Bertelsen, Henrik. Aalborg University Hospital; DinamarcaFil: Petersen, Lars J.. Aalborg University Hospital; Dinamarc

Observer agreement of treatment responses on planar bone scintigraphy in prostate cancer patients: Importance of the lesion assessment method

Purpose The aim of this study was to assess observer agreement on the evaluation of treatment responses of bone metastases by bone scintigraphy (BS) using different scoring methods in prostate cancer patients. Patients and methods Sixty-three paired BS from 55 patients were included. BS was performed before and after more than 12 weeks of anticancer treatment. A panel of experienced nuclear medicine physicians from several institutions evaluated treatment response using three different methods: (a) standard clinical assessment, (b) MD Anderson criteria, and (c) Prostate Cancer Working Group 2 (PCWG-2) criteria. All methods were based on the evaluation of paired before-after bone scans. Results Readers were able to classify the presence of bone metastases at baseline with a high level of agreement [Cohen's κ=0.94, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82-1.00]. Observer agreement on bone response by PCWG-2 criteria showed considerable agreement (Cohen's κ=0.84, 95% CI: 0.69-0.99). Evaluation using standard clinical assessment and MD Anderson criteria showed moderate agreement (0.52, 95% CI: 0.36-0.69 and 0.64, 95% CI: 0.48-0.79, respectively). There was considerable variation among readers for regional lesion count on individual scans, with limits of agreement of -10 to 10 lesions or more for the majority of anatomical regions, including the thorax, spine, and pelvis. Conclusion Observer agreement on treatment response by BS varied notably across methods. Optimal agreement was achieved by the PCWG-2 criteria. Variation in the classification of treatment response of bone metastases may have a significant impact on clinical decision-making, emphasizing the need for a uniform approach, including during clinical practice. Response assessment by lesion counting on repeated BS without access to previous scans cannot be recommended.Fil: Fonager, Randi F.. Aalborg University; DinamarcaFil: Zacho, Helle D.. Aalborg University; DinamarcaFil: Albertsen, Signe. Aalborg University; DinamarcaFil: Fledelius, Joan. Herning Hospital; DinamarcaFil: Ejlersen, June A.. Herning Hospital; DinamarcaFil: Christensen, Mette H.. Viborg Regional Hospital; DinamarcaFil: Aleksyniene, Ramune. Aalborg University; DinamarcaFil: Biurrun Manresa, José Alberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Aalborg University; DinamarcaFil: Petersen, Lars J.. Viborg Regional Hospital; Dinamarc

Additional file 1 of Added value of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for the detection of bone metastases in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer and a previous 99mTc bone scintigraphy

Additional file 1: Table S1. Best valuable comparator for bone metastases in 41 patients with at least one positive lesion demonstrated by any of the imaging modalities (BS or PSMA PET/CT)